It isn't.
At 10:31 AM 1/26/2003 +0100, you wrote:
How is 11 Mb (Canon) better than 32 Mb (35 mm film)?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 26. tammikuuta 2003 3:46
Aihe: Re: What is better? Digital Full Frame against 67
>
>One thing we must readily admit--the EOS 1Ds surpasses 35mm film.
>
>So I think we must at least admit that "digital has surpassed film."
>
>After all, it might be argued that yet another way to make the comparison
>more fair would be to compare film vs. the _same-sized_ digital sensor. So
>we would compare the EOS 1Ds to 35mm, and against the Pentax 6x7 we
would have to pit a digital medium-format camera back.
>
>--Mike
>
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
