Re: Who Dat?
Thanks for the input. Perhaps that kind of crop would work. But I wanted to create the idea of the metal dog peeking around a corner, so I stuck him right at the edge of a big frame. I feel a more conventional crop would result in a boring picture of an ordinary object. However, I suspect that there isn't much here, no matter how it's sliced. Paul On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote: Cute subject Paul. Way too much of the white stone on the LH side. Something less than half of what you've captured would be enough. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PESO: Who Dat? Here's a pic from yesterday's walkaround with the DA 12-24. I would have opened up a bit on this if I had been watching my exposure more carefully. But it's plenty sharp as shot. f22 @ 1/90th, 18mm, ISO 200 http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4169328size=lg
Re: Re: Who Dat?
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/02/28 Tue AM 11:30:02 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Who Dat? Thanks for the input. Perhaps that kind of crop would work. But I wanted to create the idea of the metal dog peeking around a corner, so I stuck him right at the edge of a big frame. I feel a more conventional crop would result in a boring picture of an ordinary object. However, I suspect that there isn't much here, no matter how it's sliced. Paul Maybe reverse the principle and get the dog from behind, looking at someone? On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote: Cute subject Paul. Way too much of the white stone on the LH side. Something less than half of what you've captured would be enough. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PESO: Who Dat? Here's a pic from yesterday's walkaround with the DA 12-24. I would have opened up a bit on this if I had been watching my exposure more carefully. But it's plenty sharp as shot. f22 @ 1/90th, 18mm, ISO 200 http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4169328size=lg - Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
Re: PESO: Who Dat?
Hi! Here's a pic from yesterday's walkaround with the DA 12-24. I would have opened up a bit on this if I had been watching my exposure more carefully. But it's plenty sharp as shot. f22 @ 1/90th, 18mm, ISO 200 http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4169328size=lg LOL... Boris
PESO: Who Dat?
Here's a pic from yesterday's walkaround with the DA 12-24. I would have opened up a bit on this if I had been watching my exposure more carefully. But it's plenty sharp as shot. f22 @ 1/90th, 18mm, ISO 200 http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4169328size=lg
Re: Who Dat?
Cute subject Paul. Way too much of the white stone on the LH side. Something less than half of what you've captured would be enough. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PESO: Who Dat? Here's a pic from yesterday's walkaround with the DA 12-24. I would have opened up a bit on this if I had been watching my exposure more carefully. But it's plenty sharp as shot. f22 @ 1/90th, 18mm, ISO 200 http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4169328size=lg
