Re: circular polarizer question

2001-05-29 Thread Alan Chan

Since the camera meter will compensate the difference automatically, you do 
not need to compensate manually. So the answer is "no". However, if you use 
a handheld meter, the answer will be "yes".

regards,
Alan Chan

>Hi,
>I have a ZX-5N and was using a circular polarizer on a wide angle lens 
>(28A)
>this weekend at a antique car show in Springfield, Missouri.  I took a lot
>of pictures and hope they turn out well.  I am just starting photography 
>and
>am really loving how much I am getting into it now.  I am always on a look
>out for pictures in my area now, Chicago area.  Anyway, I digress, I have a
>question.  In a book I own,  I believe a Kodak book on photograhy, it says
>to increase up to a couple stops when using a circular polarizer.  My
>question is that I did a little test with and without the circular 
>polarizer
>on the lens. The meter on the camera did take into consideration when using
>the circular polarizer on the lens and the meter provided about two more
>stops vs. when the polarizer was off.  I used the same scene to judge this.
>Later, I also did this with various sites at the show and did the same
>thing.  Now I hope that I did not over exposure when I took a lot of
>pictures manually over exposing from +.5 to 2 stops.
>My question, long message to read to get to the question is this, do I have
>to manually increase exposure when the circular polarizer is on the ZX-5N
>camera or does the camera do this for you?
>
>Thanks for the advise in advance,
>Scott

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: circular polarizer question

2001-05-29 Thread Alexandre A. P. Suaide

Hello,

the answer is NO. The camera will compensate by itself because there
is less light going inside the camera...

Alex

Scott Dillard wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I have a ZX-5N and was using a circular polarizer on a wide angle lens (28A)
> this weekend at a antique car show in Springfield, Missouri.  I took a lot
> of pictures and hope they turn out well.  I am just starting photography and
> am really loving how much I am getting into it now.  I am always on a look
> out for pictures in my area now, Chicago area.  Anyway, I digress, I have a
> question.  In a book I own,  I believe a Kodak book on photograhy, it says
> to increase up to a couple stops when using a circular polarizer.  My
> question is that I did a little test with and without the circular polarizer
> on the lens. The meter on the camera did take into consideration when using
> the circular polarizer on the lens and the meter provided about two more
> stops vs. when the polarizer was off.  I used the same scene to judge this.
> Later, I also did this with various sites at the show and did the same
> thing.  Now I hope that I did not over exposure when I took a lot of
> pictures manually over exposing from +.5 to 2 stops.
> My question, long message to read to get to the question is this, do I have
> to manually increase exposure when the circular polarizer is on the ZX-5N
> camera or does the camera do this for you?
> 
> Thanks for the advise in advance,
> Scott
> 
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-- 
---
Alexandre A. P. Suaide, Ph.D.   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Physics Department
University of Sao Paulo - BrazilPhone: 1-313-577-5419
Wayne State University - MI -USAICQ number: 78139605
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: circular polarizer question

2001-05-29 Thread aimcompute

Metering is through the lens, hence through the filter.  No manual
compensation should be necessary.

Tom C.

- Original Message -
From: "Scott Dillard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: circular polarizer question


> Hi,
> I have a ZX-5N and was using a circular polarizer on a wide angle lens
(28A)
> this weekend at a antique car show in Springfield, Missouri.  I took a lot
> of pictures and hope they turn out well.  I am just starting photography
and
> am really loving how much I am getting into it now.  I am always on a look
> out for pictures in my area now, Chicago area.  Anyway, I digress, I have
a
> question.  In a book I own,  I believe a Kodak book on photograhy, it says
> to increase up to a couple stops when using a circular polarizer.  My
> question is that I did a little test with and without the circular
polarizer
> on the lens. The meter on the camera did take into consideration when
using
> the circular polarizer on the lens and the meter provided about two more
> stops vs. when the polarizer was off.  I used the same scene to judge
this.
> Later, I also did this with various sites at the show and did the same
> thing.  Now I hope that I did not over exposure when I took a lot of
> pictures manually over exposing from +.5 to 2 stops.
> My question, long message to read to get to the question is this, do I
have
> to manually increase exposure when the circular polarizer is on the ZX-5N
> camera or does the camera do this for you?
>
> Thanks for the advise in advance,
> Scott
>
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: circular polarizer question

2001-05-29 Thread Dan Scott

Hi Scott,

The camera does it for you. The ZX-5n's light meter doesn't know you've put
a filter on, it just measures the light making it to the meter and adjusts
Av and Tv accordingly. You may not have hurt much, depending on the film
(print film is more forgiving than slide film).

Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>Hi,
>I have a ZX-5N and was using a circular polarizer on a wide angle lens (28A)
>this weekend at a antique car show in Springfield, Missouri.  I took a lot
>of pictures and hope they turn out well.  I am just starting photography and
>am really loving how much I am getting into it now.  I am always on a look
>out for pictures in my area now, Chicago area.  Anyway, I digress, I have a
>question.  In a book I own,  I believe a Kodak book on photograhy, it says
>to increase up to a couple stops when using a circular polarizer.  My
>question is that I did a little test with and without the circular polarizer
>on the lens. The meter on the camera did take into consideration when using
>the circular polarizer on the lens and the meter provided about two more
>stops vs. when the polarizer was off.  I used the same scene to judge this.
>Later, I also did this with various sites at the show and did the same
>thing.  Now I hope that I did not over exposure when I took a lot of
>pictures manually over exposing from +.5 to 2 stops.
>My question, long message to read to get to the question is this, do I have
>to manually increase exposure when the circular polarizer is on the ZX-5N
>camera or does the camera do this for you?
>
>Thanks for the advise in advance,
>Scott



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




circular polarizer question

2001-05-29 Thread Scott Dillard

Hi,
I have a ZX-5N and was using a circular polarizer on a wide angle lens (28A)
this weekend at a antique car show in Springfield, Missouri.  I took a lot
of pictures and hope they turn out well.  I am just starting photography and
am really loving how much I am getting into it now.  I am always on a look
out for pictures in my area now, Chicago area.  Anyway, I digress, I have a
question.  In a book I own,  I believe a Kodak book on photograhy, it says
to increase up to a couple stops when using a circular polarizer.  My
question is that I did a little test with and without the circular polarizer
on the lens. The meter on the camera did take into consideration when using
the circular polarizer on the lens and the meter provided about two more
stops vs. when the polarizer was off.  I used the same scene to judge this.
Later, I also did this with various sites at the show and did the same
thing.  Now I hope that I did not over exposure when I took a lot of
pictures manually over exposing from +.5 to 2 stops.
My question, long message to read to get to the question is this, do I have
to manually increase exposure when the circular polarizer is on the ZX-5N
camera or does the camera do this for you?

Thanks for the advise in advance,
Scott



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .