AW: istD and old primes

2003-12-03 Thread keller.schaefer
SMC Takumars work like ordinary Takumars on the *ist D - stop down in M or
AE.

Sven


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bob Rapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2003 05:13
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: istD and old primes



- Original Message -
From: Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 As far as K and M lenses are concerned,

Has anyone reported about using SMC Takumars with the K-M42 adaptor?

Bob Rapp





Re: AW: istD and old primes

2003-12-02 Thread graywolf
I would also think you could:
1. take a reading with your handheld meter, or by guessimate.
2. set the aperture on the lens.
3. set the shutter speed on the camera.
4. take the photo.
--

keller.schaefer wrote:

... has to be magic, as on my *ist D there is no exposure compensation in M.

The only way I can get this to work somehow, is to hit the green button and
then to correct shutter speed. So when in M,
1) stop down the lens as much as you like and remember the number of stops
2) frame
3) hit green button
4) correct shutter speed by the number of steps that you have stopped down
the lens
5) shoot
Or did I miss something?

Sven

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Heiko Hamann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 22:45
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: istD and old primes
Hi Jim,

on 01 Dec 03 you wrote in pentax.list:


And a last trick: stop down the lens 3 times, set the exposure
compensation to +3 and use the green button in M - now you have a nice
working AE with an old K-/M-lens.


Isn't there supposed to be some incantation you say first before you do the
last trick?


Just Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious...

Cheers, Heiko


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway.



Re: AW: istD and old primes

2003-12-02 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Or, since in most situations the light will remain the same for a while, take a
reading of the area and set the camera.  Then, when it's time to catch that
decisive moment, point, focus, and shoot.  Sometimes focus isn't even necessary
...

shel

graywolf wrote:

 I would also think you could:
 1. take a reading with your handheld meter, or by guessimate.
 2. set the aperture on the lens.
 3. set the shutter speed on the camera.
 4. take the photo.




Re: AW: istD and old primes

2003-12-02 Thread graywolf
No, no, Shel. That is too advanced for many. You have to check the lighting 
every shot, sometimes 3 or 4 times for each shot. You have to rack the focus 
back and forth, back and forth, back and forth so you will get the subject sharp 
after all a 50mm lens at f16 has hardly any DOF. It is so hard and fiddlely 
doing all that you need a really seriously computerised camera just to get a 
snapshot of your kids.

I was taking some shots the other day when I turned around and the subject was 
backlighted. Take a new reading? Set exposure compensation? Naw, the camera is 
still set for the existing light, just keep shooting. To me, automatic cameras 
are often more work not less.

BTW, did I tell you I finally got an MX? Funny how it seems to work almost 
automatically in my hands when I have not used one in 15 years. Damned if I 
don't still think it is the best 35mm SLR ever.

--

Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Or, since in most situations the light will remain the same for a while, take a
reading of the area and set the camera.  Then, when it's time to catch that
decisive moment, point, focus, and shoot.  Sometimes focus isn't even necessary
...
shel

graywolf wrote:


I would also think you could:
1. take a reading with your handheld meter, or by guessimate.
2. set the aperture on the lens.
3. set the shutter speed on the camera.
4. take the photo.



--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway.



RE: istD and old primes

2003-12-02 Thread Cesar Matamoros II
Reported in what sense?

I have used my M42 lenses a bit.  I just tend to use my K-mounts more often
and with the Limited lenses don't drag out the M42 much - that and the
limited selection...

What would you want to see?  I can try to accomodate.  I plan on doing the
screwmount scene next trip up north...

Enjoying photography,

César
Panama City, Florida

-- -Original Message-
-- From: Bob Rapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:13 PM
--
--
-- - Original Message -
-- From: Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
--  As far as K and M lenses are concerned,
--
-- Has anyone reported about using SMC Takumars with the K-M42 adaptor?
--
-- Bob Rapp
--
--
--



istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Kevin Waterson
I have a couple of 135mm lenses.
One a Takumar Bayonet 2.8-32 and the other a 2.5-22
Is it possible make these work with the istD?

Kind regards
Kevin

-- 
 __  
(_ \ 
 _) )            
|  /  / _  ) / _  | / ___) / _  )
| |  ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ / 
|_|   \) \_||_| \) \)
Kevin Waterson
Port Macquarie, Australia



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Leonard Paris
Absolutely!  One Custom Function setting and then you can shoot in aperture 
priority AE or in Manual mode.  Utter simplicity.  That's how I use my 
Zenitar 16mm fisheye with my *ist D.

Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1

From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: istD and old primes
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 06:04:47 +1100
I have a couple of 135mm lenses.
One a Takumar Bayonet 2.8-32 and the other a 2.5-22
Is it possible make these work with the istD?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
 __
(_ \
 _) )           
|  /  / _  ) / _  | / ___) / _  )
| |  ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ /
|_|   \) \_||_| \) \)
Kevin Waterson
Port Macquarie, Australia
_
Share holiday photos without swamping your Inbox.  Get MSN Extra Storage 
now!  http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Heiko Hamann
Hi Kevin,

on 04 Dec 03 you wrote in pentax.list:

I have a couple of 135mm lenses.
One a Takumar Bayonet 2.8-32 and the other a 2.5-22
Is it possible make these work with the istD?

They will work, _but_

- In AE the diaphragm won't close (or more precise: it closes, but the  
picture is taken with wide open diaphragm). But the light meter works  
and the shutter time will be set correctly.

- In M the diaphragm will be closed an the picture will be taken with  
the aperture that you've set. The light meter will work, if you press  
the green button, but again - it will meter only wide open! So you've  
calculate a little bit (stopping down 3 times at the aperture ring -  
increase the shutter time 3 times).

Another workaround is to release the lens and turn it a little bit until  
the diaphragm is closed. Now the *istD works in AE with the aperture set  
at the lens.

And a last trick: stop down the lens 3 times, set the exposure  
compensation to +3 and use the green button in M - now you have a nice  
working AE with an old K-/M-lens.

Cheers, Heiko



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Rfsindg
Len, 

So excuse me, but this is correct?

I tuned out for the 500 emails (or was it 5,000) whining about the *ist D not 
being able to use K and M lenses.  Nobody had the camera in hand, just the 
instructions, and everybody was speculating.  So now that we have the camera to 
see and touch, we can use old K and M lenses?  Please advise...

Regards,  Bob S.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Absolutely!  One Custom Function setting and then you can shoot in 
aperture 
  priority AE or in Manual mode.  Utter simplicity.  That's how I use my 
  Zenitar 16mm fisheye with my *ist D.
  
  Len
  
  From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  I have a couple of 135mm lenses.
  One a Takumar Bayonet 2.8-32 and the other a 2.5-22
  Is it possible make these work with the istD?



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Bill Owens
Or simply use the D in manual mode and use a hand held meter.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Heiko Hamann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: istD and old primes


 Hi Kevin,

 on 04 Dec 03 you wrote in pentax.list:

 I have a couple of 135mm lenses.
 One a Takumar Bayonet 2.8-32 and the other a 2.5-22
 Is it possible make these work with the istD?

 They will work, _but_

 - In AE the diaphragm won't close (or more precise: it closes, but the
 picture is taken with wide open diaphragm). But the light meter works
 and the shutter time will be set correctly.

 - In M the diaphragm will be closed an the picture will be taken with
 the aperture that you've set. The light meter will work, if you press
 the green button, but again - it will meter only wide open! So you've
 calculate a little bit (stopping down 3 times at the aperture ring -
 increase the shutter time 3 times).

 Another workaround is to release the lens and turn it a little bit until
 the diaphragm is closed. Now the *istD works in AE with the aperture set
 at the lens.

 And a last trick: stop down the lens 3 times, set the exposure
 compensation to +3 and use the green button in M - now you have a nice
 working AE with an old K-/M-lens.

 Cheers, Heiko






Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: istD and old primes


 Len,

 So excuse me, but this is correct?

 I tuned out for the 500 emails (or was it 5,000) whining about the *ist D
not
 being able to use K and M lenses.  Nobody had the camera in hand, just the
 instructions, and everybody was speculating.  So now that we have the
camera to
 see and touch, we can use old K and M lenses?  Please advise...

Nothing has changed. The camera doesn't have the aperture simulator lever
(or whatever the heck the thing is called).
It will mount K lenses, and it will take pictures with them after you have
told the camera to allow it, but you don't get a lot of metering options,
and there are some wonks in the operation.
It works pretty much as I expected it to when I was calling it a crippled
whore.

William Robb



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Jim Apilado


 From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:18:33 -0500
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: istD and old primes
 Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:18:44 -0500
 
 Or simply use the D in manual mode and use a hand held meter.
 
 Bill
 

 And a last trick: stop down the lens 3 times, set the exposure
 compensation to +3 and use the green button in M - now you have a nice
 working AE with an old K-/M-lens.
 
 Cheers, Heiko

Isn't there supposed to be some incantation you say first before you do the
last trick?
 
 
 
 



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Heiko Hamann
Hi Jim,

on 01 Dec 03 you wrote in pentax.list:

 And a last trick: stop down the lens 3 times, set the exposure
 compensation to +3 and use the green button in M - now you have a nice
 working AE with an old K-/M-lens.

Isn't there supposed to be some incantation you say first before you do the
last trick?

Just Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious...

Cheers, Heiko



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Or simply use the D in manual mode and use a hand held meter.

I put on the prime 135mm 2.5-22 lense and all I get is a flashing

Av - -

in the LCD panel. I set it to Manual focus and M on the dial,
but nothin works, cannot even make it take a photo.

What might this be?

Kind regards
Kevin

-- 
 __  
(_ \ 
 _) )            
|  /  / _  ) / _  | / ___) / _  )
| |  ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ / 
|_|   \) \_||_| \) \)
Kevin Waterson
Port Macquarie, Australia



Re: istD and old primes

2003-12-01 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Waterson
Subject: Re: istD and old primes


 This one time, at band camp, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Or simply use the D in manual mode and use a hand held meter.

 I put on the prime 135mm 2.5-22 lense and all I get is a flashing

 Av - -

 in the LCD panel. I set it to Manual focus and M on the dial,
 but nothin works, cannot even make it take a photo.

 What might this be?

Might be you haven't got the inscrutable custom function that allows the
camera to release the shutter with the aperture ring off A set to allow the
shutter to operate with the aperture off A.

William Robb