Re: [Pdns-users] DNSsec DS trouble in single server TLD setup

2011-04-27 Thread bert hubert
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Niek wrote:
 Couldn't get it to work with the TLD and the child zone on the same server.
 I was wondering whether this could be a bug in PowerDNS Server or whether I'm
 maybe trying to do something the wrong way. (And I was wondering if it also
 affects subdomains on the same server as the parent domain, I didn't
 investigate)

Thank you for your investigation!

Build 2181 is up which fixes your initial DS bug. Can you check if things
are ok now?

Bert

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] mysql-tests

2011-04-27 Thread bert hubert
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:04:51AM +0200, erkan yanar wrote:
 As Im missing any good data I created 6*10^6 entries for domains and
 for every domain some entries in the records-table (about 66*10^6)

That is a pretty good test! 6 million domains is around 2 million domains
smaller than the largest deployment we know of.

   Queries per second:   10923.212970 qps

Interesting. Post 3.0 we will be focussing on performance for a few
releases. It may well be that we'll add guidance on which indexes to use.

 As I miss live/real data I would like to get into contact with some 
 live/real-data.

You can use tcpdump  dnsreplay perhaps?

Bert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] mysql-tests

2011-04-27 Thread erkan yanar
Moin Bert,

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:15:27PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:04:51AM +0200, erkan yanar wrote:
  As Im missing any good data I created 6*10^6 entries for domains and
  for every domain some entries in the records-table (about 66*10^6)
 
 That is a pretty good test! 6 million domains is around 2 million domains
 smaller than the largest deployment we know of.
 
Queries per second:   10923.212970 qps
 
 Interesting. Post 3.0 we will be focussing on performance for a few
 releases. It may well be that we'll add guidance on which indexes to use.

In fact I did a new test (on sunday azlev forced me to use -q :):

 # ./dnsperf -d /var/tmp/pdns.list -q 4000 -s localhost

DNS Performance Testing Tool

Nominum Version 1.0.1.0

[Status] Processing input data
[Status] Sending queries (to 127.0.0.1)
[Status] Testing complete

Statistics:

  Parse input file: once
  Ended due to: reaching end of file

  Queries sent: 494969 queries
  Queries completed:494969 queries
  Queries lost: 0 queries

  Avg request size: 55 bytes
  Avg response size:81 bytes

  Percentage completed: 100.00%
  Percentage lost:0.00%

  Started at:   Sun Apr 24 02:50:44 2011
  Finished at:  Sun Apr 24 02:51:05 2011
  Ran for:  21.518132 seconds

  Queries per second:   23002.414894 qps

With pdns-cache it was easy doubled (with up to 1% Packet lost).



 
  As I miss live/real data I would like to get into contact with some 
  live/real-data.
 
 You can use tcpdump  dnsreplay perhaps?

Naa Im just a little dba. In fact I own 5 domains:)

Erkan

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] DNSsec DS trouble in single server TLD setup

2011-04-27 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
Bert,

 Build 2181 is up which fixes your initial DS bug. Can you check if things
 are ok now?

r2181 fixes this for me, but I note that DS records are served only when
querying with +dnssec. Omitting the switch gives NOERROR and NODATA.
(This behaviour differs from that of BIND and NSD.) 

For example:

dig +nodnssec powerdnssec.org ds

Regards,

-JP
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] DNSsec DS trouble in single server TLD setup

2011-04-27 Thread Niek
Great job Bert!

I can confirm that build 2181 fixes this problem completely.

And it also fixes [Pdns-users] Delegating a subdomain with DNSsec fails if
child and parent zone are on same server

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:59:00AM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Niek wrote:
  Couldn't get it to work with the TLD and the child zone on the same server.
  I was wondering whether this could be a bug in PowerDNS Server or whether 
  I'm
  maybe trying to do something the wrong way. (And I was wondering if it also
  affects subdomains on the same server as the parent domain, I didn't
  investigate)
 
 Thank you for your investigation!
 
 Build 2181 is up which fixes your initial DS bug. Can you check if things
 are ok now?
 
   Bert
 

Grtz,
-- Niek

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] DNSsec DS trouble in single server TLD setup

2011-04-27 Thread Niek
Hi JP,

Overhere it looks okay:

;  DiG 9.6.1-P2  +nodnssec powerdnssec.org ds
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 16718
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;powerdnssec.org.   IN  DS

;; ANSWER SECTION:
powerdnssec.org. 86332 IN  DS  2224 5 1 CD79B0D2639AAA5AE5ABDC80003836E5E5E0C506



On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:58:43PM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
 Bert,
 
  Build 2181 is up which fixes your initial DS bug. Can you check if things
  are ok now?
 
 r2181 fixes this for me, but I note that DS records are served only when
 querying with +dnssec. Omitting the switch gives NOERROR and NODATA.
 (This behaviour differs from that of BIND and NSD.) 
 
 For example:
 
 dig +nodnssec powerdnssec.org ds
 
 Regards,
 
 -JP
 ___
 Pdns-users mailing list
 Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
 http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
 

Grtz,
-- Niek

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] lookup failing only with pdns recursor

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Felder
Wait, found that this is the same problem as in thread DNS resolution  
problem with pdns-recursor-3.3




I am sorry, but I think this has been a wild goose chase regarding a
bug in the recursor. The existing 3.3 version works just fine with
resolving cdn4.digitalconcerthall.com from a system outside our
network. I am going to start looking into a firewall or networking
problem. Thank you for your assistance and I will let you know what
I find and hopefully it will help someone else.



I also found this works on the same recursor on a machine outside the  
network. Now I'm rapidly hunting down the problem.




Regards,



Mark
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users