Re: [Pdns-users] pdns & nproxy

2012-07-06 Thread Gary Shaver


Hi Peter,

You are 100% correct.  This is why some type of notify proxying would be 
such a good thing :)
Proxying notfiys back to a dedicated slave would eliminate this issue 
completely.


Gary
Hurricane Electric


Peter van Dijk <mailto:peter.van.d...@netherlabs.nl>
July 6, 2012 7:38 AM
Hello Gary,

you should never try to initiate TCP between two IPs, one of which is 
anycasted. It's a recipe for failure, no matter how hard you try to 
find the right node.



Kind regards,
Gary Shaver <mailto:gsha...@he.net>
July 6, 2012 7:04 AM

Hi Bert, Fred, List,

An anycasted nameserver cluster could benefit from this.  Initiating 
an axfr from  from a nameserver that is not topologically closest to 
the master just results in a
failed axfr attempt since the answer does not come back to the slave 
making the initial request.



Gary Shaver
Hurricane Electric

bert hubert <mailto:bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl>
July 5, 2012 3:00 PM

Interesting. The original use case was where the outside world would 
never be talking to that master, or at least not taking the initiative 
to do so. So the outside world would think the nproxy IP address was 
the slave, and nproxy would then relay that to the real slave, which 
would reach out over TCP to make it happen. I think some NAT trick is 
used to make sure that the outgoing traffic appears as the address 
that was notified.


If you want to have this integrated, what exactly is your use case? 
Better protection for the hidden master?


Please don't get me wrong, I get the impression what you want is 
reasonable, but I can't quite wrap my head around your exact requirements.


Please let us know!

Bert
PowerDNS

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Fred Wittekind <mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org>
July 5, 2012 11:18 AM
I'm working on deploying pdns, and we had intended to use native 
replication (mysql-replication).


Our idea was to have one master dns server that sits behind a 
firewall, and our public facing servers replicate from it.  This works 
well for 90%+ of the domains we host.  We do have a few we have to 
slave from our clients though.


My original plan was to have nproxy sit on the public facing name 
servers to forward the notify to the master dns server behind the 
firewall, the master then does the axfr from our client's server, 
populates mysql with the new zone info, that then replicates out to 
the public facing servers.


Then I got this error when trying to start nproxy (IP address censored):
nproxy: Fatal: Binding socket for incoming packets to 'a.b.c.d:53': 
Address already in use


Which of course makes sense after seeing it, pdns is already binding 
to the same IP/port.


So, my question is this...  Can the functionality of nproxy be rolled 
into pdns so that pdns itself can forward the notify to another 
instance of pdns (on the master server), or can nproxy and pdns be 
made to work on the same IP.   I looked into trying to see if I could 
get iptables to split out the notify messages to a different 
destination IP so I could put nproxy on a different IP than pdns, but, 
I didn't figure out a good (reliable) way to do this.


Any help would be appreciated.

Fred Wittekind
!DSPAM:4ff5da85151923326710967!
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


<>___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] pdns & nproxy

2012-07-06 Thread Gary Shaver


Hi Bert, Fred, List,

An anycasted nameserver cluster could benefit from this.  Initiating an 
axfr from  from a nameserver that is not topologically closest to the 
master just results in a
failed axfr attempt since the answer does not come back to the slave 
making the initial request.



Gary Shaver
Hurricane Electric

bert hubert <mailto:bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl>
July 5, 2012 3:00 PM

Interesting. The original use case was where the outside world would 
never be talking to that master, or at least not taking the initiative 
to do so. So the outside world would think the nproxy IP address was 
the slave, and nproxy would then relay that to the real slave, which 
would reach out over TCP to make it happen. I think some NAT trick is 
used to make sure that the outgoing traffic appears as the address 
that was notified.


If you want to have this integrated, what exactly is your use case? 
Better protection for the hidden master?


Please don't get me wrong, I get the impression what you want is 
reasonable, but I can't quite wrap my head around your exact requirements.


Please let us know!

Bert
PowerDNS

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


!DSPAM:4ff60e6d270271029916480!

Fred Wittekind <mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org>
July 5, 2012 11:18 AM
I'm working on deploying pdns, and we had intended to use native 
replication (mysql-replication).


Our idea was to have one master dns server that sits behind a 
firewall, and our public facing servers replicate from it.  This works 
well for 90%+ of the domains we host.  We do have a few we have to 
slave from our clients though.


My original plan was to have nproxy sit on the public facing name 
servers to forward the notify to the master dns server behind the 
firewall, the master then does the axfr from our client's server, 
populates mysql with the new zone info, that then replicates out to 
the public facing servers.


Then I got this error when trying to start nproxy (IP address censored):
nproxy: Fatal: Binding socket for incoming packets to 'a.b.c.d:53': 
Address already in use


Which of course makes sense after seeing it, pdns is already binding 
to the same IP/port.


So, my question is this...  Can the functionality of nproxy be rolled 
into pdns so that pdns itself can forward the notify to another 
instance of pdns (on the master server), or can nproxy and pdns be 
made to work on the same IP.   I looked into trying to see if I could 
get iptables to split out the notify messages to a different 
destination IP so I could put nproxy on a different IP than pdns, but, 
I didn't figure out a good (reliable) way to do this.


Any help would be appreciated.

Fred Wittekind
!DSPAM:4ff5da85151923326710967!
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


<>___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] Slave zone just won't refresh....

2010-06-09 Thread Gary Shaver


Hi Bert,
I have a few that we've put on a bind server locally here.  We were 
providing secondary service for one domain that had WKS records (which 
is how I ended up starting down this road).


Here are the WKS records that customer's nameserver was spitting out 
towards us.


atlantica.us.   604800  IN  WKS 173.16.9.10 6 22 25 42 53 80 
113 443 6667 8008

atlantica.us.   604800  IN  WKS 173.16.9.10 17 22 25 42 53 80 
443 8008

*.atlantica.us.		604800	IN	WKS	173.16.9.10 6 22 25 42 53 80 113 443 6667 
8008


*.atlantica.us. 604800  IN  WKS 173.16.9.10 17 22 25 42 53 80 
443 8008

Ariel.atlantica.us.	604800	IN	WKS	173.16.9.10 6 22 25 42 80 113 443 6667 
8008


Ariel.atlantica.us. 604800  IN  WKS 173.16.9.10 17 22 25 42 80 443 
8008

It seems shorter versions of the WKS record will go in, but they cause 
other issues. (see below)


For example: This record will actually work, and be entered into the 
database without crashing the backend.


r...@ns1:~# dig test-wks-good.com @ns1.csbd.org AXFR

; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 <<>> test-wks-good.com @ns1.csbd.org AXFR
;; global options:  printcmd
test-wks-good.com.	86400	IN	SOA	ns1.csbd.org. hostmaster.csbd.org. 
2010060902 10800 1800 604800 86400

test-wks-good.com.  86400   IN  NS  ns1.csbd.org.
test-wks-good.com.  86400   IN  NS  ns2.csbd.org.
test-wks-good.com.  86400   IN  A   10.1.1.2
test-wks-good.com.  86400   IN  WKS 173.16.9.10 6 22
test-wks-good.com.	86400	IN	SOA	ns1.csbd.org. hostmaster.csbd.org. 
2010060902 10800 1800 604800 86400

;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 2001:470:1:111::21#53(2001:470:1:111::21)
;; WHEN: Wed Jun  9 14:51:39 2010
;; XFR size: 6 records (messages 1, bytes 198)

But getting anything back out is futile.

# dig test-wks-good.com @ns1.he.net AXFR

; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 <<>> test-wks-good.com @ns1.he.net AXFR
;; global options:  printcmd
test-wks-good.com.	86400	IN	SOA	ns1.csbd.org. hostmaster.csbd.org. 
2010060902 10800 1800 604800 86400

;; Got bad packet: FORMERR
115 bytes
56 57 84 00 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 00 0d 74 65 73
74 2d 77 6b 73 2d 67 6f 6f 64 03 63 6f 6d 00 00
fc 00 01 c0 0c 00 02 00 01 00 01 51 80 00 0e 03
6e 73 31 04 63 73 62 64 03 6f 72 67 00 c0 0c 00
02 00 01 00 01 51 80 00 06 03 6e 73 32 c0 33 c0
0c 00 01 00 01 00 01 51 80 00 04 0a 01 01 02 c0
0c 00 00 00 01 00 01 51 80 00 08 ad 10 09 0a 06
00 00 02

-- database entry --

id  domain_id   nametypecontent ttl prio
26038029 112454 test-wks-good.com #11   \# 8 ad10090a0602   86400

If I can be of further help, please let me know,
Gary


On 6/9/10 2:37 PM, bert hubert wrote:

Garry,

"2.6.1 WKS WKS records are deprecated in [RFC 1123]. They serve no known
useful function, except internally among LISP machines"

Normally we'd whip up an implementation just to have the issue go away, but
it is a pretty weird record type too, containing a bitmap of protocols.

Unknown record type support might save us, but it is not quite there yet it
appears.

I struggle to find some WKS zone file examples btw, do you have any?

Bert

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:31:22PM -0700, Gary Shaver wrote:

Hi Ken,

I just found your ticket from abut 4 years ago... Seems strange that
it's still a bug.  We just ran a few tests and yep.. you were
completely correct, WKS records just piss off pdns something fierce.

I'll consolidate the test case down to something reasonable and
submit a bug report.

Gary

On 6/9/10 12:54 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:

Ah, I hit the same problem. WKS records are not supported by
PDNS. On top of that, they are not really useful and have not
been for quite a while. Try nuking them and your zone should
transfer fine.

Regards,
Ken

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:43:27AM -0700, Gary Shaver wrote:



On 6/9/10 5:49 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:


another issue that I've run into was another slave zone.  This had pdns
cycling every 2-3 seconds

Jun  7 00:48:44 ns1 pdns[10216]: Initiating transfer of 'axxxa.us'
from
remote '216.117.186.93'
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: AXFR started for 'axxxa.us',
transaction started
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: Communicator thread died because of
error:
Failed to execute mysql_query, perhaps connection died? Err=1: You have
an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL
server version for the right syntax to use near ''\\# 1007
ad10090a060240002080
004000' at line 1
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Our pdns instance exited with code 0
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Respawning
Jun  7 00:48:47 ns1 pdns[10258]: Guardian is launching an instance

Simply removing the zone puts everything back in a happy state, so It's
not
a timeout issue. Are there any debugging options that can be turn

Re: [Pdns-users] Slave zone just won't refresh....

2010-06-09 Thread Gary Shaver

Hi Ken,

I just found your ticket from abut 4 years ago... Seems strange that 
it's still a bug.  We just ran a few tests and yep.. you were completely 
correct, WKS records just piss off pdns something fierce.


I'll consolidate the test case down to something reasonable and submit a 
bug report.


Gary

On 6/9/10 12:54 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:

Ah, I hit the same problem. WKS records are not supported by
PDNS. On top of that, they are not really useful and have not
been for quite a while. Try nuking them and your zone should
transfer fine.

Regards,
Ken

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:43:27AM -0700, Gary Shaver wrote:



On 6/9/10 5:49 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:


another issue that I've run into was another slave zone.  This had pdns
cycling every 2-3 seconds

Jun  7 00:48:44 ns1 pdns[10216]: Initiating transfer of 'axxxa.us'
from
remote '216.117.186.93'
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: AXFR started for 'axxxa.us',
transaction started
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: Communicator thread died because of
error:
Failed to execute mysql_query, perhaps connection died? Err=1: You have
an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL
server version for the right syntax to use near ''\\# 1007
ad10090a060240002080
004000' at line 1
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Our pdns instance exited with code 0
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Respawning
Jun  7 00:48:47 ns1 pdns[10258]: Guardian is launching an instance

Simply removing the zone puts everything back in a happy state, so It's
not
a timeout issue. Are there any debugging options that can be turned on
for
the mysql backend?  I didn't find any referenced in the documentation and
increasing the loglevel doesn't give me any additional information.

I've pulled down the zone and besides the laundry list of different
record
types, it looks fine.  I can sanitize it an post it if that would help.

The pdns version is the static .deb package from the main download page.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Gary



Hi Gary,

Try enabling the MySQL query logging to see what command is being
received by the backend. You can also bump the logging level on the
PDNS system to see if it gives you more information. Have you changed
any of the default queries? What is your PDNS configuration, including
the backend chosen? At 27 entries, you could post the entire zone but
if the problem is a weird character, sanitizing it will make the
information useless. I would try bumping the debugging levels first.
I cannot help much on the MySQL side since we use PostgreSQL as the
backend database.


I already tried both of those.  Increasing the loglevel didn't yield any
additional information and query log didn't include the query, I suspect
due to it's failure.

I've attached the zone. I've changed the hostnames and ip's. The remainder
of the zone is untouched.

Gary


Regards,
Ken

--
Gary Shaver | Voice 510.580.4100, Fax 510.580.4151
Hurricane Electric  | AS6939
Network Operations  | http://www.he.net

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users








--
Gary Shaver | Voice 510.580.4100, Fax 510.580.4151
Hurricane Electric  | AS6939
Network Operations  | http://www.he.net




;<<>>  DiG 9.4.2-P2.1<<>>  a.us @10.117.186.93 AXFR
;; global options:  printcmd
a.us.   7200IN  SOA DD1.a.us. 
AtlDNS.Fxl.Com. 2010060736 1200 600 2419200 10800
a.us.   7200IN  NS  DD1.a.us.
a.us.   7200IN  NS  NS1.SxP.US.
a.us.   604800  IN  2fff:470:e056::
a.us.   604800  IN  2fff:ad10:90a::
a.us.   604800  IN  A   192.168.9.10
a.us.   604800  IN  WKS 192.168.9.10 6 22 25 42 80 113 
443 6667 8008
a.us.   604800  IN  WKS 192.168.9.10 17 22 25 42 80 443 
8008
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  10 Mail.a.us.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  30 Mail.Rxxxt.US.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  30 Mail2.Rxxxt.US.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  40 ASPMX.L.Google.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  50 Alt1.ASPMX.L.Google.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  50 Alt2.ASPMX.L.Google.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX2.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX3.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX4.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 AS

Re: [Pdns-users] Slave zone just won't refresh....

2010-06-09 Thread Gary Shaver



On 6/9/10 5:49 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:


another issue that I've run into was another slave zone.  This had pdns
cycling every 2-3 seconds

Jun  7 00:48:44 ns1 pdns[10216]: Initiating transfer of 'axxxa.us' from
remote '216.117.186.93'
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: AXFR started for 'axxxa.us',
transaction started
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: Communicator thread died because of error:
Failed to execute mysql_query, perhaps connection died? Err=1: You have an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL
server version for the right syntax to use near ''\\# 1007
ad10090a060240002080
004000' at line 1
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Our pdns instance exited with code 0
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Respawning
Jun  7 00:48:47 ns1 pdns[10258]: Guardian is launching an instance

Simply removing the zone puts everything back in a happy state, so It's not
a timeout issue. Are there any debugging options that can be turned on for
the mysql backend?  I didn't find any referenced in the documentation and
increasing the loglevel doesn't give me any additional information.

I've pulled down the zone and besides the laundry list of different record
types, it looks fine.  I can sanitize it an post it if that would help.

The pdns version is the static .deb package from the main download page.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Gary



Hi Gary,

Try enabling the MySQL query logging to see what command is being
received by the backend. You can also bump the logging level on the
PDNS system to see if it gives you more information. Have you changed
any of the default queries? What is your PDNS configuration, including
the backend chosen? At 27 entries, you could post the entire zone but
if the problem is a weird character, sanitizing it will make the
information useless. I would try bumping the debugging levels first.
I cannot help much on the MySQL side since we use PostgreSQL as the
backend database.


I already tried both of those.  Increasing the loglevel didn't yield any 
additional information and query log didn't include the query, I suspect 
due to it's failure.


I've attached the zone. I've changed the hostnames and ip's. The 
remainder of the zone is untouched.


Gary


Regards,
Ken

--
Gary Shaver | Voice 510.580.4100, Fax 510.580.4151
Hurricane Electric  | AS6939
Network Operations  | http://www.he.net

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users




!DSPAM:4c0f8df3317271137924711!



--
Gary Shaver | Voice 510.580.4100, Fax 510.580.4151
Hurricane Electric  | AS6939
Network Operations  | http://www.he.net

; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 <<>> a.us @10.117.186.93 AXFR
;; global options:  printcmd
a.us.   7200IN  SOA DD1.a.us. 
AtlDNS.Fxl.Com. 2010060736 1200 600 2419200 10800
a.us.   7200IN  NS  DD1.a.us.
a.us.   7200IN  NS  NS1.SxP.US.
a.us.   604800  IN  2fff:470:e056::
a.us.   604800  IN  2fff:ad10:90a::
a.us.   604800  IN  A   192.168.9.10
a.us.   604800  IN  WKS 192.168.9.10 6 22 25 42 80 113 
443 6667 8008
a.us.   604800  IN  WKS 192.168.9.10 17 22 25 42 80 443 
8008
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  10 Mail.a.us.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  30 Mail.Rxxxt.US.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  30 Mail2.Rxxxt.US.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  40 ASPMX.L.Google.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  50 Alt1.ASPMX.L.Google.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  50 Alt2.ASPMX.L.Google.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX2.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX3.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX4.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  60 ASPMX5.GoogleMail.Com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  80 
mxbackup1.junkemailfilter.com.
a.us.   604800  IN  MX  90 
mxbackup2.junkemailfilter.com.
a.us.   604800  IN  TXT "v=spf1 mx 
ip6:2fff:470:e056::/48 ptr exists:%{i}.%{l}.%{o}._spf.%{d} -all 
exp=explain._spf.%{d}"
a.us.   604800  IN  RP  Philip.a.us. 
Contact.a.us.
*.a.us. 604800  IN  CNAME   Aa.US.
explain._spf.a.us. 604800 INTXT "%{s} - %{i} is not one of 
%{d}'s designated m

[Pdns-users] Slave zone just won't refresh....

2010-06-08 Thread Gary Shaver


Before I pull much more hair out, I thought I'd toss this up to the list 
to see if anyone has experienced this in the past (or has better 
google-foo than I)


I'm slaving a zone from 208.78.69.112, I'm able to pull the zone 
manually using dig, but it does go a little slower than I would expect. 
 Pdns just times out.. over and over... Is there a way to increase the 
timeout? or is there something that I'm missing.
The zone itself does not appear to be malformed.. the nameserver I'm 
pulling from is just slow..


;; Query time: 5479 msec
;; SERVER: 208.78.69.112#53(208.78.69.112)
;; WHEN: Tue Jun  8 17:13:44 2010
;; XFR size: 27 records (messages 27, bytes 1748)

 logs 

Jun  8 16:53:10 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112
Jun  8 16:54:11 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112
Jun  8 16:55:12 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112
Jun  8 16:56:13 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112
Jun  8 16:57:14 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112
Jun  8 16:58:15 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112
Jun  8 16:59:16 ns1 pdns[1725]: Error trying to retrieve/refresh 
'oxxxm.com': Timeout waiting for answer from 208.78.69.112



another issue that I've run into was another slave zone.  This had pdns 
cycling every 2-3 seconds


Jun  7 00:48:44 ns1 pdns[10216]: Initiating transfer of 'axxxa.us' 
from remote '216.117.186.93'
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: AXFR started for 'axxxa.us', 
transaction started
Jun  7 00:48:45 ns1 pdns[10216]: Communicator thread died because of 
error: Failed to execute mysql_query, perhaps connection died? Err=1: 
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds 
to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ''\\# 1007 
ad10090a060240002080

004000' at line 1
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Our pdns instance exited with code 0
Jun  7 00:48:46 ns1 pdns[16017]: Respawning
Jun  7 00:48:47 ns1 pdns[10258]: Guardian is launching an instance

Simply removing the zone puts everything back in a happy state, so It's 
not a timeout issue. Are there any debugging options that can be turned 
on for the mysql backend?  I didn't find any referenced in the 
documentation and increasing the loglevel doesn't give me any additional 
information.


I've pulled down the zone and besides the laundry list of different 
record types, it looks fine.  I can sanitize it an post it if that would 
help.


The pdns version is the static .deb package from the main download page.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Gary

--
Gary Shaver | Voice 510.580.4100, Fax 510.580.4151
Hurricane Electric  | AS6939
Network Operations  | http://www.he.net

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users