[Pdns-users] Patch 1466 not working with PDNS version 2.9.22.x
Hi Because of an issue, we are oblige to work with a modified version of powerdns: 2.9.22.X We face a new issue that is listed with a ticket 224 and a patch 1466. however, this patch don't work with a 2.9.22.x Version (I confirme it work with a simple 2.9.22) Have you some explaination, or correction for this ? Thank you for your help. http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1466 ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
[Pdns-users] Using root-referral
I'am using the option send-root-referral=lean (or yes) in my powerdns authoritative server. This server isn't recursive. When my server need to reply with CNAME where we are not authoritative for the destination, the server add root server in the authority section, and ip address in the additional section. Often this reply, can't enter in a UDP packet and need a TCP reply. When i analyse trafic with tcpdump and wireshark i can found [Malformed Packet: DNS] For most resolver, this is not a problem, and communication continue in TCP But it look like some other resolver (or firewall) stop on this Malformed Packet and resolution can't finish. But only with PowerDNS authoritative server. With other, this type of resolver can switch in TCP One solution is the reduce the number of root server we send on authority and additional section to limit the packet size. This can't bo done in configuration file and need to patch sources file. Do you now this problem, and is there any other solution. ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
[Pdns-users] Trouble with subdomain having CNAME and MX
Hello I notice that some subdomain having CNAME and MX configured don't reply to MX query. After some test and research i notice that the record id order credit importance to the dns reply. If the CNAME record id is lower than the MX record id, then powerdns can't resolv MX record Exemple: test1.domain.com IN CNAME www.domain.com test1.domain.com IN MX 10 mail1.domain.Com dig mx test1.domain.com Is there a resolution for this bug? Best Rergard ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...
Hello I have this problem too. i try this patch http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/changeset/1081 I'have download the last SVN 1097 compil and install on a new server, result is always a same. If i ask the server for a type he return the wildcard CNAME even if a A type exist. Is there someone who have resolv this bug. Thank 2007/8/13, Augie Schwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 8/11/07, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:06:23AM -0700, Augie Schwer wrote: > > > > A fix is in svn, so I wonder if people can verify that it solves the > > > > problem. > > > > Good luck! > > > That looks like it fixes it Bert. I'll have to do some more testing on > > > Monday, but preliminary results look good. Thank you so much Bert! > > Please also (re-)test all the other corner cases you reported in the > past. > > Those are most likely to be affected by this fix. > > Well it certainly seems to fix the problem (#125); the other bug > that seems related is #124: > > http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/124 > > This still exists, but I'm not sure this is a problem, I only know it > is different then what BIND returns; mostly it probably depends on how > the resolvers handle SERVFAILs. > > > -- > Augie Schwer-[EMAIL PROTECTED]-http://schwer.us > Key fingerprint = 9815 AE19 AFD1 1FE7 5DEE 2AC3 CB99 2784 27B0 C072 > ___ > Pdns-users mailing list > Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com > http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users > ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Re: [Pdns-users] CNAME answer problem?
Thank you for this reply
Do you know in witch RFC we can find this 'Algorithm', it seem that the
cname reply with servfail is a problem for some web hosting and for DNSSTUFF
*Server failure! [took 171 ms]. Response: Server failure. There's a problem
with the DNS server for WWW.abcde.com.*
2007/8/10, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 07:34:51AM +0200, Hannes M. wrote:
> > i have some strange problem with CNAME records to an external domain.
> > For example:
>
> This is a commonly observed oddity of the domain name system.
>
> Indeed, powerdns returns a 'servfail' if you ask it for www3.example.com,
> but it turns out that resolving nameservers ('recursors') know about that.
>
> The reason powerdns needs to return servfail is because it cannot
> faithfully
> answer the question - it does not know about 'www.somewhere-else.com',
> that
> domain is 'out of its bailiwick' in DNS speak.
>
> However, recursors get the hint and continue resolving for
> 'www.somewhere-else.com'.
>
> So what you observe is the 'SERVFAIL', because you did not configure
> powerdns to resolve for you.
>
> If you'd include a line 'recursor=4.2.2.1' for example, you would get a
> complete answer, because in that case powerdns would offload the
> processing
> of www.somewhere-else.com to the configured recursor.
>
> For www.example.com this won't work as it is a fake domain, but you get
> the
> idea.
>
> > dig +norecurs www3.example.com delivers the CNAME as stored, but PDNS
> > does not resolve.
>
> Well, that is as it should be.
>
> Good luck!
>
> --
> http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
> http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
> ___
> Pdns-users mailing list
> Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
>
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
[Pdns-users] how PDNS must reply to malformed query
Hi, I would like to know and understand why PowerDNS don't reply to malformed query I try to make some malformed queries on PowerDNS and Bind. dig @localhost 'w w @ \\. test.com' - PowerDNS don't reply - Bind reply whith a RCODE NXDOMAIN If i look to the RFC NXDOMAIN means non existent domain (yes, he don't exist but he don't have to exist) In RFC I can see the RCODE 1 = FORMERR, it would seem that it is a good reply code for this query. So i would like to understand why this RCODE is not implemented, why powerdns choose to not reply and bind to reply with NXDOMAIN. Thank you ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
[Pdns-users] MB or MR records
HiI have install power dns to make some test and i have some records who are not supported and pdns can't update the zone files if this records are presentthe record are MR and MB.Is it possible to patch Power DNS for this records to be supported or that Powerdns update the zone file without this record. Thank you for your help ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Re: [Pdns-users] Try to compile PDNS on red hat 9
2006/8/17, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:33:36AM +0200, Joyce LAMBERT wrote:> I try to compile Power DNS on a Red Hat 9 and have some problem with the> boost dependency.>> I'have dowload the source file for Boost > /home/user/boost_1_33_1/Did you untar it? Is there a /home/user/boost_1_33_1/boost directorycreated?Yes Boost is untar and this directory like the file shared_ptr.hpp is present > But always the same message> Missing boost - please install Boost packages or see > http://doc.powerdns.com/compiling-powerdns.htmlCheck config.log for the relevant error message, and let us know.Here is what i con find 1390 configure:20922: result: no 1391 configure:20926: checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp presence 1392 configure:20936: /lib/cpp conftest.cc 1393 In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/config.hpp:40, 1394 from /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:17, 1395 from conftest.cc:34: 1396 /usr/local/include/boost/config/select_stdlib_config.hpp:20:19: utility: No such file or directory 1397 In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/config.hpp:53, 1398 from /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:17, 1399 from conftest.cc:34: 1400 /usr/local/include/boost/config/platform/linux.hpp:14:19: cstdlib: No such file or directory 1401 In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:28, 1402 from /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:26, 1403 from conftest.cc:34: 1404 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/bad_weak_ptr.hpp:20:21: exception: No such file or directory 1405 In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/detail/sp_counted_base.hpp:56, 1406 from /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:29, 1407 from /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:26, 1408 from conftest.cc:34: 1409 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_nt.hpp:21:20: typeinfo: No such file or directory 1410 In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:30, 1411 from /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:26, 1412 from conftest.cc:34: 1413 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/sp_counted_impl.hpp:34:46: memory: No such file or directory 1414 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/sp_counted_impl.hpp:35:61: typeinfo: No such file or directory 1415 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/sp_counted_impl.hpp:36:43: cstddef: No such file or directory 1416 In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:26, 1417 from conftest.cc:34: 1418 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:32:61: memory: No such file or directory 1419 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:33:41: functional: No such file or directory 1420 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:34:46: new: No such file or directory 1421 /usr/local/include/boost/detail/shared_count.hpp:35:61: typeinfo: No such file or directory 1422 In file included from conftest.cc:34: 1423 /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:29:53: memory: No such file or directory 1424 /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:30:49: algorithm: No such file or directory 1425 /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:31:49: functional: No such file or directory 1426 /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:32:53: typeinfo: No such file or directory 1427 /usr/local/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:33:58: iosfwd: No such file or directory Good luck!--http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Softwarehttp://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
[Pdns-users] Try to compile PDNS on red hat 9
HiI try to compile Power DNS on a Red Hat 9 and have some problem with the boost dependency.I'have dowload the source file for Boost/home/user/boost_1_33_1/And try to compile Power DNS like this CXXFLAGS="-I/home/user/boost_1_33_1" ./configureBut always the same messageMissing boost - please install Boost packages or see http://doc.powerdns.com/compiling-powerdns.html I have try other way to compile PDNS (like compiling and install boost)Change with or without quote but it don't work.Has anyone any Idea.Thank you(I have no problem to compil or making package for debian only on red hat) ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
