Re: [pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2?
I don't see any problem to use newer h2 if you put it into Orbit. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Chris Aniszczyk" To: "PDT Developers" Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:09:03 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2? Any response on this guys? It shouldn't be that hard :/ I'm willing to manage the library in Orbit. On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Roy Ganor wrote: > Also copying the DLTK project. > > We currently use: > * > /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20100519200754/updateSite > * pluginIDsToInstall=org.apache.commons.lang+org.h2 > > Roy > > -Original Message- > From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 5:00 PM > To: PDT Developers > Subject: [pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2? > > It would be nice if you guys could move to a newer (preferably latest version) > of the h2 database [1]. In Fedora and RHEL land, we generally ship the latest > libraries and it's easier for us to deal with Eclipse when we don't have to > patch it to support the latest library. > > From the looks of it... I see Version 1.3.149 (2011-01-07) > > [1] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=334464 > > -- > Cheers, > > Chris Aniszczyk > http://aniszczyk.org > +1 860 839 2465 > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] DLTK joined Indigo
Hello, I've updated DLTK contibution in Indigo with 3.0 builds, so your contribution now fails: https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/indigo.runAggregator/159/console Please update it as well. @see http://wiki.eclipse.org/Indigo/Contributing_to_Indigo_Build Regards, Alex ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] H2 index in DLTK
Hi all, The 1st design question: why H2-indexing doesn't use ISourceElementParser to automatically index model element declarations? This way should be easier for adopters as they don't need to implement one more interface. And IIndexingParser can become optional, to report additional information. What do you think? Regards, Alex - Original Message ----- From: "Alex Panchenko" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Monday, March 1, 2010 11:51:14 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] H2 index in DLTK Hi Roy, - Roy Ganor wrote: > Hi Alex, > Moving to the h2-based index by default makes perfectly sense as many > PDT users reported significant performance improvements. It will also > make the people worked on this method very happy ;) > > We don't have any internal tests for this method but all tests that > currently work on top of the h2-indexing itself should provide a good > picture on possible flaws. > > Several questions that cross my mind: > 1. Will DLTK bundle/maintain the basic index mechanism (not the > h2-one). Can we make it as an extra feature like h2-index is now? That's why I am touching it: I would like to avoid having 2 index implementations. > 2. Since currently h2 database is available in a more updated version > as confirmed by Eclipse IP process (1.117) it will make sense to not > bundle h2 inside the plugin/feature but leave adopters to use whatever > version they want. I always was for making h2.jar available externally :) But we need to check that Helios build can find it somewhere. > 3. There is a nice framework (org.eclipse.test.performance) that > Michael contributed that checks for performance regressions. It will > be nice to run it under the two methods and provide a benchmark. Do > you think DLTK build system can monitor changes and provide it? org.eclipse.test.performance can compare performance metrics of different versions(builds) of the same tests. We tried it for some time, but it's disabled now to reduce build time. > 4. Using the h2-based index is a big step forward, however there is > always a place for improvement. Since PDT is currently the (only > AFAIK) one that adopts this plugin, it makes sense to consult in this > forum before changes are done. Definitely we'll discuss the changes first. > > Best regards, > Roy > -Original Message- > From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] > On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:34 PM > To: PDT Developers > Subject: [pdt-dev] H2 index in DLTK > > Hi all, > > I was looking if it makes sense to move all DLTK indexing into H2. > And if DLTK will go this way probably I'll make some changes to these > plugins. > Do you have any concerns about it? > > And the related question: do you have any standalone unit tests for > the index implementation? > > Thank you, > Alex > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi Zhao,
My second sentence was addressed to you & Roy (=PDT team).
It's morning here :)
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "赵忠伟"
To: "PDT Developers"
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2010 6:39:49 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi, Alex
After I checked out what I mentioned above the PDT works.Before that I
encountered the same problem:)
So,I think PDT code assist will work after he checkout the three plugins.
According to his descrption I think he did not checkout them:)
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Alex Panchenko < a...@xored.com > wrote:
H2 can be checkouted from DLTK repository
/org.eclipse.dltk/external/plugins/org.h2.core
And probably you should make PDT depending on these plugins as it doesn't work
without them.
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "赵忠伟" < zhaozhong...@eclipseworld.org >
To: "PDT Developers" < pdt-dev@eclipse.org >
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2010 6:22:19 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
I have the same problem long ago!
Do you checkout the following two plugins?
org.eclipse.dltk.core.index.sql,org.eclipse.dltk.core.index.sql.h2
And you have to download h2 database in you eclipse plugins directory:)
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Robert Gruendler < rob...@dubture.com > wrote:
some more info:
the root for that exception seems to be in
org.eclipse.dltk.internal.core.index2.IndexerManager, line 47:
IConfigurationElement[] elements = Platform.getExtensionRegistry()
.getConfigurationElementsFor( INDEXER_POINT );
The elements Array is empty, so the indexer field is null.
regards
-robert
On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Robert Gruendler wrote:
i was looking at the .log file of the workspace which doesn't have code
assistance,
and i'm getting this exception everytime i trigger code assistance:
!MESSAGE PHPCore plugin internal error
!STACK 0
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.Arrays$ArrayList.(Arrays.java:3357)
at java.util.Arrays.asList(Arrays.java:3343)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.strategies.GlobalTypesStrategy.getTypes(GlobalTypesStrategy.java:120)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.strategies.GlobalTypesStrategy.apply(GlobalTypesStrategy.java:74)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.strategies.GlobalElementsCompositeStrategy.apply(GlobalElementsCompositeStrategy.java:43)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.PHPCompletionEngine.complete(PHPCompletionEngine.java:89)
at org.eclipse.dltk.internal.core.Openable$1.run(Openable.java:494)
Seems like the code assistance is activated, and the reason for no code
assistance is an internal exception.
Another thing that points into that direction is that code assistance isn't
working at a project scope, ie:
public class Foo {
protected $bar;
public function test() {
$this-> <--- triggers the exception too.
}
}
regards
-robert
On Mar 3, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Robert Gruendler wrote:
is there any temporary workaround to re-activate the code assistance for
the language library ?
regards
-robert
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Roy Ganor wrote:
Hi Alex, I see that Mylyn-DLTK bridge plugin is the only one that plays with
these preferences. Probably for wrapping things with its own proposals list.
Anyway, the unpleasant situation where empty proposals list is shown should be
fixes somehow.
Thanks!
Roy
From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org ] On
Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:30 PM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
JDT has preference page to manage them, DLTK uses preferences but without
preference page.
Actually I couldn't find the code changing it, but I remember once it was
somehow disabled in my development workspace.
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Roy Ganor" < r...@zend.com >
To: "PDT Developers" < pdt-dev@eclipse.org >
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 8:19:00 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
BTW, any reason why a user would select to disable the script category? You
mentioned on exception but it seems odd to me that it is common.
Are there other situations where this category can be disabled?
Thanks!
Roy
From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org ] On
Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:54 PM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi,
It's possible that PDT proposal computer was disabled in prefe
Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
H2 can be checkouted from DLTK repository
/org.eclipse.dltk/external/plugins/org.h2.core
And probably you should make PDT depending on these plugins as it doesn't work
without them.
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "赵忠伟"
To: "PDT Developers"
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2010 6:22:19 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
I have the same problem long ago!
Do you checkout the following two plugins?
org.eclipse.dltk.core.index.sql,org.eclipse.dltk.core.index.sql.h2
And you have to download h2 database in you eclipse plugins directory:)
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Robert Gruendler < rob...@dubture.com > wrote:
some more info:
the root for that exception seems to be in
org.eclipse.dltk.internal.core.index2.IndexerManager, line 47:
IConfigurationElement[] elements = Platform.getExtensionRegistry()
.getConfigurationElementsFor( INDEXER_POINT );
The elements Array is empty, so the indexer field is null.
regards
-robert
On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Robert Gruendler wrote:
i was looking at the .log file of the workspace which doesn't have code
assistance,
and i'm getting this exception everytime i trigger code assistance:
!MESSAGE PHPCore plugin internal error
!STACK 0
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.Arrays$ArrayList.(Arrays.java:3357)
at java.util.Arrays.asList(Arrays.java:3343)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.strategies.GlobalTypesStrategy.getTypes(GlobalTypesStrategy.java:120)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.strategies.GlobalTypesStrategy.apply(GlobalTypesStrategy.java:74)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.strategies.GlobalElementsCompositeStrategy.apply(GlobalElementsCompositeStrategy.java:43)
at
org.eclipse.php.internal.core.codeassist.PHPCompletionEngine.complete(PHPCompletionEngine.java:89)
at org.eclipse.dltk.internal.core.Openable$1.run(Openable.java:494)
Seems like the code assistance is activated, and the reason for no code
assistance is an internal exception.
Another thing that points into that direction is that code assistance isn't
working at a project scope, ie:
public class Foo {
protected $bar;
public function test() {
$this-> <--- triggers the exception too.
}
}
regards
-robert
On Mar 3, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Robert Gruendler wrote:
is there any temporary workaround to re-activate the code assistance for
the language library ?
regards
-robert
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Roy Ganor wrote:
Hi Alex, I see that Mylyn-DLTK bridge plugin is the only one that plays with
these preferences. Probably for wrapping things with its own proposals list.
Anyway, the unpleasant situation where empty proposals list is shown should be
fixes somehow.
Thanks!
Roy
From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org ] On
Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:30 PM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
JDT has preference page to manage them, DLTK uses preferences but without
preference page.
Actually I couldn't find the code changing it, but I remember once it was
somehow disabled in my development workspace.
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Roy Ganor" < r...@zend.com >
To: "PDT Developers" < pdt-dev@eclipse.org >
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 8:19:00 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
BTW, any reason why a user would select to disable the script category? You
mentioned on exception but it seems odd to me that it is common.
Are there other situations where this category can be disabled?
Thanks!
Roy
From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org ] On
Behalf Of Alex Panchenko
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:54 PM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi,
It's possible that PDT proposal computer was disabled in preferences (e.g. if
exception was thrown), so it makes sense to test in a *new* workspace.
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Roy Ganor" < r...@zend.com >
To: "PDT Developers" < pdt-dev@eclipse.org >
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 7:56:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi Robert,
Can you share your .settings folder, .buildpath and .project files?
Best regards,
Roy
From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org ] On
Behalf Of Robert Gruendler
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:08 PM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi all,
i don't get any c
Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
JDT has preference page to manage them, DLTK uses preferences but without preference page. Actually I couldn't find the code changing it, but I remember once it was somehow disabled in my development workspace. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 8:19:00 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library BTW, any reason why a user would select to disable the script category? You mentioned on exception but it seems odd to me that it is common. Are there other situations where this category can be disabled? Thanks! Roy From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:54 PM To: PDT Developers Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library Hi, It's possible that PDT proposal computer was disabled in preferences (e.g. if exception was thrown), so it makes sense to test in a *new* workspace. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 7:56:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library Hi Robert, Can you share your .settings folder, .buildpath and .project files? Best regards, Roy From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Robert Gruendler Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:08 PM To: PDT Developers Subject: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library Hi all, i don't get any code assistance for the php language library in php projects. The only assistance that shows up,are the template proposals, like try/catch, fn etc. My PDT extension is completely disabled in the run environment, and i've tested this bug also on a standalone eclipse installation with the latest pdt 2.2. Version Info: Eclipse: 3.5.2 Build id: M20100211-1343 DLTK: 2.0.0 (CVS HEAD) PDT: 2.2.0 (CVS HEAD) Anyone else experiencing this problem? regards -robert ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library
Hi, It's possible that PDT proposal computer was disabled in preferences (e.g. if exception was thrown ), so it makes sense to test in a *new* workspace. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 7:56:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library Hi Robert, Can you share your .settings folder, .buildpath and .project files? Best regards, Roy From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Robert Gruendler Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:08 PM To: PDT Developers Subject: [pdt-dev] No code assistance for PHP Language Library Hi all, i don't get any code assistance for the php language library in php projects. The only assistance that shows up,are the template proposals, like try/catch, fn etc. My PDT extension is completely disabled in the run environment, and i've tested this bug also on a standalone eclipse installation with the latest pdt 2.2. Version Info: Eclipse: 3.5.2 Build id: M20100211-1343 DLTK: 2.0.0 (CVS HEAD) PDT: 2.2.0 (CVS HEAD) Anyone else experiencing this problem? regards -robert ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] H2 index in DLTK
Hi Roy, - Roy Ganor wrote: > Hi Alex, > Moving to the h2-based index by default makes perfectly sense as many > PDT users reported significant performance improvements. It will also > make the people worked on this method very happy ;) > > We don't have any internal tests for this method but all tests that > currently work on top of the h2-indexing itself should provide a good > picture on possible flaws. > > Several questions that cross my mind: > 1. Will DLTK bundle/maintain the basic index mechanism (not the > h2-one). Can we make it as an extra feature like h2-index is now? That's why I am touching it: I would like to avoid having 2 index implementations. > 2. Since currently h2 database is available in a more updated version > as confirmed by Eclipse IP process (1.117) it will make sense to not > bundle h2 inside the plugin/feature but leave adopters to use whatever > version they want. I always was for making h2.jar available externally :) But we need to check that Helios build can find it somewhere. > 3. There is a nice framework (org.eclipse.test.performance) that > Michael contributed that checks for performance regressions. It will > be nice to run it under the two methods and provide a benchmark. Do > you think DLTK build system can monitor changes and provide it? org.eclipse.test.performance can compare performance metrics of different versions(builds) of the same tests. We tried it for some time, but it's disabled now to reduce build time. > 4. Using the h2-based index is a big step forward, however there is > always a place for improvement. Since PDT is currently the (only > AFAIK) one that adopts this plugin, it makes sense to consult in this > forum before changes are done. Definitely we'll discuss the changes first. > > Best regards, > Roy > -Original Message- > From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] > On Behalf Of Alex Panchenko > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:34 PM > To: PDT Developers > Subject: [pdt-dev] H2 index in DLTK > > Hi all, > > I was looking if it makes sense to move all DLTK indexing into H2. > And if DLTK will go this way probably I'll make some changes to these > plugins. > Do you have any concerns about it? > > And the related question: do you have any standalone unit tests for > the index implementation? > > Thank you, > Alex > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] H2 index in DLTK
Hi all, I was looking if it makes sense to move all DLTK indexing into H2. And if DLTK will go this way probably I'll make some changes to these plugins. Do you have any concerns about it? And the related question: do you have any standalone unit tests for the index implementation? Thank you, Alex ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard
Hi Robert, Not yet. I'll try to find some time for it during March. Thanks for reminder :) Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Robert Gruendler" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:31:37 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard Hi Alex, is the refactoring regarding the ProjectWizard done ? thanks! -robert On Nov 14, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Alex Panchenko wrote: > Hi, > > The plan is to move some code parts from TCL project wizard into base DLTK > project wizard. > I hope to do it before Christmas. > > Regards, > Alex > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Gründler" > To: pdt-dev@eclipse.org > Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:41:44 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk > Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard > > Hi again, > > the DLTK team recommended me to have a look at the TCL Project Creation > wizard, however, it simply > extends the dltk project wizard, which means i would need to implement > the Project wizard for the framework > completely by scratch, plus re-implement the functionality the php > project wizard provides right now. > > Are there any plans for the near future to implement either the > wizard-extension points or the solution > recommended by Konstantin using the facet project framework? > > best > > -robert > > > > > Am 11/6/09 6:45 PM, schrieb Michael Spector: >> I think it's a question to DLTK team, since PDT extends DLTK's project >> wizard. >> >> Best regards, >> Michael >> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik >> wrote: >> >>> PDT Team, >>> >>> As a side note, has there been any further thoughts on utilizing faceted >>> project framework in PDT? Using the framework would give extenders like >>> Robert a natural way to build on PDT projects with little effort on the part >>> of PDT. >>> >>> - Konstantin >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On >>> Behalf Of Robert Gründler >>> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 9:32 AM >>> To: pdt-dev@eclipse.org >>> Subject: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i would like to extend the php project wizard, but according to this post >>> to the mailing list, the phpwizardpages extension is not used anymore: >>> >>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.pdt/msg03659.html >>> >>> Does anoyne know if it's possible to add some UI elements to the >>> pdt "New Project..." wizard ? >>> >>> >>> thanks ! >>> >>> >>> -robert >>> ___ >>> pdt-dev mailing list >>> pdt-dev@eclipse.org >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.51/2482 - Release Date: 11/06/09 >>> 07:38:00 >>> >>> ___ >>> pdt-dev mailing list >>> pdt-dev@eclipse.org >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev >>> >>> >> ___ >> pdt-dev mailing list >> pdt-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev >> > > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] API Change in PHPSourceParserFactory
Hi Robert,
Use
parser.parse(context.getSourceModule())
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Gruendler"
To: "PDT Developers"
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 3:41:40 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk
Subject: [pdt-dev] API Change in PHPSourceParserFactory
Hi all,
i've updated an older PDT Development Project which runs on Eclipse 3.5, and
after updating PDT from cvs i get an compile error in my IBuildParticipant:
@Override
public void build(IBuildContext context) throws CoreException {
try {
char [] fileName = context.getFile().getName().toCharArray();
PHPSourceParserFactory parser = new PHPSourceParserFactory();
ModuleDeclaration module = parser. parse (fileName, context.getContents(), new
NullProblemReporter());
module.traverse( new CakeASTVisitor(context));
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
The method parse(IModuleSource, IProblemReporter) in the type
PHPSourceParserFactory is not applicable for the arguments (char[], char[],
NullProblemReporter)
Does anyone know how i can get hands on the IModuleSource to pass to the parse
method of the PHPSourceParserFactory ?
thanks!
-robert
___ pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] Unable to open editor
Hi Robert, There were API changes in DLTK last week, that's why previous PDT builds don't work. I think next PDT build should be OK. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Robert Gruendler" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 11:12:31 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: [pdt-dev] Unable to open editor Hi all, i'm using pdt 2.2 and dltk 2.0 in eclipse 3.5. After updating dltk to the latest version, i cannot open php editors anymore. I've filed a bug report with the full stack trace here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=302801 Should the current pdt version from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/updates/2.2/interim/ work with latest dlkt version? Thanks -robert ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard
Hi, The plan is to move some code parts from TCL project wizard into base DLTK project wizard. I hope to do it before Christmas. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Robert Gründler" To: pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:41:44 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard Hi again, the DLTK team recommended me to have a look at the TCL Project Creation wizard, however, it simply extends the dltk project wizard, which means i would need to implement the Project wizard for the framework completely by scratch, plus re-implement the functionality the php project wizard provides right now. Are there any plans for the near future to implement either the wizard-extension points or the solution recommended by Konstantin using the facet project framework? best -robert Am 11/6/09 6:45 PM, schrieb Michael Spector: > I think it's a question to DLTK team, since PDT extends DLTK's project wizard. > > Best regards, > Michael > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik > wrote: > >> PDT Team, >> >> As a side note, has there been any further thoughts on utilizing faceted >> project framework in PDT? Using the framework would give extenders like >> Robert a natural way to build on PDT projects with little effort on the part >> of PDT. >> >> - Konstantin >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On >> Behalf Of Robert Gründler >> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 9:32 AM >> To: pdt-dev@eclipse.org >> Subject: [pdt-dev] Extending the project wizard >> >> Hi, >> >> i would like to extend the php project wizard, but according to this post >> to the mailing list, the phpwizardpages extension is not used anymore: >> >> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.pdt/msg03659.html >> >> Does anoyne know if it's possible to add some UI elements to the >> pdt "New Project..." wizard ? >> >> >> thanks ! >> >> >> -robert >> ___ >> pdt-dev mailing list >> pdt-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.51/2482 - Release Date: 11/06/09 >> 07:38:00 >> >> ___ >> pdt-dev mailing list >> pdt-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev >> >> > ___ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] Fwd: [Helios] Failed for build 2009-08-21_00-41-07
Hi David, This is our first commit to Helios and we changed the DLTK version number 1.0 -> 2.0. Previous contribution attempts were not successful because of signing problems. If it's too late to change anything in M1 - I can undo my commit, so we will start participating from M2. Thank you, Alex - Original Message - From: "David M Williams" To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:45:52 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Fwd: [Helios] Failed for build 2009-08-21_00-41-07 Glad you commented Alex ... I was just doing my last run for Helios M1 when this failed ... and previously had been running correctly all night ... it's always that way, eh? Did you intend this for Helios M1 specifically? Or are you contributing towards M2 already? Thanks, From: Alex Panchenko To: PDT Developers Date: 08/21/2009 01:24 AM Subject: [pdt-dev] Fwd: [Helios] Failed for build 2009-08-21_00-41-07 Sent by: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Hi all, I have recently updated DLTK in org.eclipse.helios.build, so you should also update your contribution to the helios release. Regards, Alex - Forwarded Message - From: "David Williams" To: "DLTK Build Team" , "DLTK Build Team" Cc: "David Williams" Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:09:46 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: [Helios] Failed for build 2009-08-21_00-41-07 The following errors occured when building Helios: Software being installed: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0 Missing requirement: org.eclipse.php.feature.group 2.1.1.v20090708-1127-7L7979F8NcJKhKOR99SkWJ requires 'org.eclipse.dltk.core.feature.group [1.0.0,2.0.0)' but it could not be found Cannot satisfy dependency: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.php.sdk.feature.group [2.1.1.v20090707-1108-51184QACJCPBYeNOmUQaXJduha9O] Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.php.sdk.feature.group 2.1.1.v20090707-1108-51184QACJCPBYeNOmUQaXJduha9O depends on: org.eclipse.php.feature.group [2.1.1.v20090708-1127-7L7979F8NcJKhKOR99SkWJ] Check the log file for more information: https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/helios.runBuckyBuild/69/console ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] Fwd: [Helios] Failed for build 2009-08-21_00-41-07
Hi all, I have recently updated DLTK in org.eclipse.helios.build, so you should also update your contribution to the helios release. Regards, Alex - Forwarded Message - From: "David Williams" To: "DLTK Build Team" , "DLTK Build Team" Cc: "David Williams" Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:09:46 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: [Helios] Failed for build 2009-08-21_00-41-07 The following errors occured when building Helios: Software being installed: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0 Missing requirement: org.eclipse.php.feature.group 2.1.1.v20090708-1127-7L7979F8NcJKhKOR99SkWJ requires 'org.eclipse.dltk.core.feature.group [1.0.0,2.0.0)' but it could not be found Cannot satisfy dependency: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.php.sdk.feature.group [2.1.1.v20090707-1108-51184QACJCPBYeNOmUQaXJduha9O] Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.php.sdk.feature.group 2.1.1.v20090707-1108-51184QACJCPBYeNOmUQaXJduha9O depends on: org.eclipse.php.feature.group [2.1.1.v20090708-1127-7L7979F8NcJKhKOR99SkWJ] Check the log file for more information: https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/helios.runBuckyBuild/69/console ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2
Hm, it turns out you have ProjectIndexer2 mentioned twice, so here is updated patch: ### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0 #P org.eclipse.php.core Index: plugin.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/tools/org.eclipse.pdt/plugins/org.eclipse.php.core/plugin.xml,v retrieving revision 1.67 diff -u -r1.67 plugin.xml --- plugin.xml 16 Aug 2009 07:52:14 - 1.67 +++ plugin.xml 17 Aug 2009 10:28:57 - @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ -
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2
As I see it was done only for tags, but not for . Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:41:42 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 This is exactly what I did in org.eclipse.php.core/plugin.xml, maybe you’re not sync? Thanks, Btw- you can remove the comment in the dltkcore plugin about the ProjectIndexer2. From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:24 AM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org; Michael Spector Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, Could you please enable index2 only for PHP, i.e.: ### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0 #P org.eclipse.php.core Index: plugin.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/tools/org.eclipse.pdt/plugins/org.eclipse.php.core/plugin.xml,v retrieving revision 1.67 diff -u -r1.67 plugin.xml --- plugin.xml 16 Aug 2009 07:52:14 - 1.67 +++ plugin.xml 17 Aug 2009 06:56:08 - @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ point="org.eclipse.dltk.core.projectIndexer"> + nature="org.eclipse.php.core.PHPNature"> Thank you, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org, "Michael Spector" Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:22:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 the index2.ProjectIndexer2 is now enabled for php nature (following Alex’s changes) Thanks for clarifying, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:52 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, It looks like we have some misunderstanding here. h2-1.1.116.jar is already a plugin. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:02:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Problem is that until h2 is included in orbit, PDT users need to create a plugin manually that includes the h2 library and then load it somehow. I think it is too complicated... Any chance to make this plugin internal to core or as Michael created initially as an external one? Thank you for your time, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:55 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, I think we should not include (optional) external dependencies into DLTK builds. Users can download h2 from the link below until it is included in Orbit. What do you think? And DLTK includes org.eclipse.dltk.index.sql.* plugins actually using h2. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , "Alex Panchenko" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:36:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Eclipse PDT was built against the latest integration DLTK build already, thanks for providing this build. I’ll be able to make the adjustments later on this week. Can you explain why org.h2.core was not included in the core DLTK package? Best Regards, Roy Btw - Michael - thanks for forwarding, have fun J From: dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Michael Spector Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:56 PM To: Alex Panchenko; DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, I'm forwarding this mail to DLTK/PDT mailing lists, since I'm unable to check this (I'm on holiday). Thanks, Michael On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Alex Panchenko < a...@xored.com > wrote: Hi Michael, 1) I have built h2.jar by their own build script, it is available at http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/dltk/externals/h2-1.1.116.jar It should not be downloaded as part of DLTK plugins, since it's external dependency and users should download it explicitly. 2) I have made code adjustments, so Ruby & TCL work as before even if new plugins are available. (However, I believe we need additional checks & testing in this area). Please make adjustments to your extensions (contribute indexer2 and disable other indexers only for your nature) and check if it works for you. If you have any questions - let's discuss them. When everything is fine for you & us - I'll make new build and upload i
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2
Hi Roy, Could you please enable index2 only for PHP, i.e.: ### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0 #P org.eclipse.php.core Index: plugin.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/tools/org.eclipse.pdt/plugins/org.eclipse.php.core/plugin.xml,v retrieving revision 1.67 diff -u -r1.67 plugin.xml --- plugin.xml 16 Aug 2009 07:52:14 - 1.67 +++ plugin.xml 17 Aug 2009 06:56:08 - @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ point="org.eclipse.dltk.core.projectIndexer"> + nature="org.eclipse.php.core.PHPNature"> Thank you, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org, "Michael Spector" Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:22:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 the index2.ProjectIndexer2 is now enabled for php nature (following Alex’s changes) Thanks for clarifying, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:52 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, It looks like we have some misunderstanding here. h2-1.1.116.jar is already a plugin. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:02:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Problem is that until h2 is included in orbit, PDT users need to create a plugin manually that includes the h2 library and then load it somehow. I think it is too complicated... Any chance to make this plugin internal to core or as Michael created initially as an external one? Thank you for your time, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:55 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, I think we should not include (optional) external dependencies into DLTK builds. Users can download h2 from the link below until it is included in Orbit. What do you think? And DLTK includes org.eclipse.dltk.index.sql.* plugins actually using h2. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , "Alex Panchenko" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:36:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Eclipse PDT was built against the latest integration DLTK build already, thanks for providing this build. I’ll be able to make the adjustments later on this week. Can you explain why org.h2.core was not included in the core DLTK package? Best Regards, Roy Btw - Michael - thanks for forwarding, have fun J From: dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Michael Spector Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:56 PM To: Alex Panchenko; DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, I'm forwarding this mail to DLTK/PDT mailing lists, since I'm unable to check this (I'm on holiday). Thanks, Michael On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Alex Panchenko < a...@xored.com > wrote: Hi Michael, 1) I have built h2.jar by their own build script, it is available at http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/dltk/externals/h2-1.1.116.jar It should not be downloaded as part of DLTK plugins, since it's external dependency and users should download it explicitly. 2) I have made code adjustments, so Ruby & TCL work as before even if new plugins are available. (However, I believe we need additional checks & testing in this area). Please make adjustments to your extensions (contribute indexer2 and disable other indexers only for your nature) and check if it works for you. If you have any questions - let's discuss them. When everything is fine for you & us - I'll make new build and upload it to eclipse. I really don't want to make buggy builds publicly available. Thank you, Alex ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2
Hi Roy, If you have ideas how to simplify installation of dependencies (currently they are EMF and h2) we can discuss them. Thank you, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:19:14 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Of course it is J sorry for not taking a closer look. Still there is no feature that includes this plug-in , so practically our users need to drop it to their plugins folder (or alternatively we will release a feature in DLTK/PDT that includes this plug-in) Regards, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:52 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, It looks like we have some misunderstanding here. h2-1.1.116.jar is already a plugin. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:02:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Problem is that until h2 is included in orbit, PDT users need to create a plugin manually that includes the h2 library and then load it somehow. I think it is too complicated... Any chance to make this plugin internal to core or as Michael created initially as an external one? Thank you for your time, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:55 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, I think we should not include (optional) external dependencies into DLTK builds. Users can download h2 from the link below until it is included in Orbit. What do you think? And DLTK includes org.eclipse.dltk.index.sql.* plugins actually using h2. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , "Alex Panchenko" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:36:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Eclipse PDT was built against the latest integration DLTK build already, thanks for providing this build. I’ll be able to make the adjustments later on this week. Can you explain why org.h2.core was not included in the core DLTK package? Best Regards, Roy Btw - Michael - thanks for forwarding, have fun J From: dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Michael Spector Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:56 PM To: Alex Panchenko; DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, I'm forwarding this mail to DLTK/PDT mailing lists, since I'm unable to check this (I'm on holiday). Thanks, Michael On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Alex Panchenko < a...@xored.com > wrote: Hi Michael, 1) I have built h2.jar by their own build script, it is available at http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/dltk/externals/h2-1.1.116.jar It should not be downloaded as part of DLTK plugins, since it's external dependency and users should download it explicitly. 2) I have made code adjustments, so Ruby & TCL work as before even if new plugins are available. (However, I believe we need additional checks & testing in this area). Please make adjustments to your extensions (contribute indexer2 and disable other indexers only for your nature) and check if it works for you. If you have any questions - let's discuss them. When everything is fine for you & us - I'll make new build and upload it to eclipse. I really don't want to make buggy builds publicly available. Thank you, Alex ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2
Hi Roy, It looks like we have some misunderstanding here. h2-1.1.116.jar is already a plugin. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: a...@xored.com Cc: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:02:24 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Problem is that until h2 is included in orbit, PDT users need to create a plugin manually that includes the h2 library and then load it somehow. I think it is too complicated... Any chance to make this plugin internal to core or as Michael created initially as an external one? Thank you for your time, Roy From: a...@xored.com [mailto:a...@xored.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:55 PM To: Roy Ganor Cc: DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Roy, I think we should not include (optional) external dependencies into DLTK builds. Users can download h2 from the link below until it is included in Orbit. What do you think? And DLTK includes org.eclipse.dltk.index.sql.* plugins actually using h2. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , "Alex Panchenko" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:36:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Eclipse PDT was built against the latest integration DLTK build already, thanks for providing this build. I’ll be able to make the adjustments later on this week. Can you explain why org.h2.core was not included in the core DLTK package? Best Regards, Roy Btw - Michael - thanks for forwarding, have fun J From: dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Michael Spector Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:56 PM To: Alex Panchenko; DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, I'm forwarding this mail to DLTK/PDT mailing lists, since I'm unable to check this (I'm on holiday). Thanks, Michael On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Alex Panchenko < a...@xored.com > wrote: Hi Michael, 1) I have built h2.jar by their own build script, it is available at http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/dltk/externals/h2-1.1.116.jar It should not be downloaded as part of DLTK plugins, since it's external dependency and users should download it explicitly. 2) I have made code adjustments, so Ruby & TCL work as before even if new plugins are available. (However, I believe we need additional checks & testing in this area). Please make adjustments to your extensions (contribute indexer2 and disable other indexers only for your nature) and check if it works for you. If you have any questions - let's discuss them. When everything is fine for you & us - I'll make new build and upload it to eclipse. I really don't want to make buggy builds publicly available. Thank you, Alex ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2
Hi Roy, I think we should not include (optional) external dependencies into DLTK builds. Users can download h2 from the link below until it is included in Orbit. What do you think? And DLTK includes org.eclipse.dltk.index.sql.* plugins actually using h2. Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Roy Ganor" To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" , "Alex Panchenko" , pdt-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:36:57 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: RE: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, Eclipse PDT was built against the latest integration DLTK build already, thanks for providing this build. I’ll be able to make the adjustments later on this week. Can you explain why org.h2.core was not included in the core DLTK package? Best Regards, Roy Btw - Michael - thanks for forwarding, have fun J From: dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:dltk-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Michael Spector Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:56 PM To: Alex Panchenko; DLTK Developer Discussions; pdt-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [Dltk-dev] Re: index2 Hi Alex, I'm forwarding this mail to DLTK/PDT mailing lists, since I'm unable to check this (I'm on holiday). Thanks, Michael On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Alex Panchenko < a...@xored.com > wrote: Hi Michael, 1) I have built h2.jar by their own build script, it is available at http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/dltk/externals/h2-1.1.116.jar It should not be downloaded as part of DLTK plugins, since it's external dependency and users should download it explicitly. 2) I have made code adjustments, so Ruby & TCL work as before even if new plugins are available. (However, I believe we need additional checks & testing in this area). Please make adjustments to your extensions (contribute indexer2 and disable other indexers only for your nature) and check if it works for you. If you have any questions - let's discuss them. When everything is fine for you & us - I'll make new build and upload it to eclipse. I really don't want to make buggy builds publicly available. Thank you, Alex ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
[pdt-dev] Re: [Dltk-dev] PDT Crashes
Hi all, CC: to pdt-dev, since the subject is mostly related to PDT. I think I have restored compatibility of VariableKind class, since it was a recent change and is mentioned in the links below. Do you know if there are other incompatible API changes? Do you wish to check it PDT 2.0 compiles/works with DLTK-HEAD? Do you want to detect the latest DLTK version working with PDT 2.0? Thank you, Alex - Original Message - From: "Renato Silva" To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 12:06:37 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: [Dltk-dev] PDT Crashes People are reporting the same problem out there: http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/article.php?id=3757&group=eclipse.tools.pdt#3757 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=280652 Alex, you told me we can use 1.0M4 which would work with PDT 2.0: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dltk-dev/msg01681.html However, as PDT 2.0 + DLTK integration builds were working nicely a few weeks ago, it seems to me that even tough the code has changed a lot from M4, only recent changes made DLTK imcompatible with PDT. Unfortunately, it seems that PDT 2.1 which would be comaptible with latest DLTK builds, on the other hand are incompatibe with Ganymede. My suggestion is to detect what is the latest DLTK version working with PDT 2.0, from the last few weeks, and then create another similar update site, something like http://download.eclipse.org/technology/dltk/updates-dev/ganymede , and a branch in CVS repo, for maintenance. I think that many people are still using Ganymede + PDT, and I think it would be nice to give them some support for a while. ___ dltk-dev mailing list dltk-...@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [pdt-dev] Re: PHP Package
Hi all, org.eclipse.dltk.core feature should be used. Update site contributed to Galileo build is http://download.eclipse.org/technology/dltk/updates-dev/1.0-stable/ Regards, Alex - Original Message - From: "Nick Boldt" To: "Markus Knauer" Cc: "ian skerrett" , "PDT Developers" , epp-...@eclipse.org Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 2:35:55 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: [pdt-dev] Re: PHP Package The DLTK contact for Galileo releng is Andrey Platov. http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo#Projects Looking in the filesystem on dev.eclipse.org , I see plugins/org.eclipse.dltk.ui_*.jar*, but no features. Can you try pointing EPP at this update site, and installing some other DLTK feature, like core.sdk ? http://download.eclipse.org/technology/dltk/updates-dev/1.0/ Nick On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Markus Knauer < mkna...@eclipsesource.com > wrote: I am getting this error now: !MESSAGE Software being installed: epp.package.php 1.0.0 !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.equinox.p2.director 4 0 2009-04-30 11:18:23.438 !MESSAGE Missing requirement: org.eclipse.epp.package.php.feature.feature.group 1.0.0.200904301040 requires 'org.eclipse.dltk.ui.feature.group 0.0.0' but it could not be found It seems to be missing the org.eclipse.dltk.ui feature which is *not* in the Galileo repository. Any ideas how to circumvent this? Did you try to install e.g. org.eclipse.php.sdk from the Galileo repo? -> This should result in the same problem, but I didn't check it yet. Who would be responsible for putting org.eclipse.dltk.ui into the Galileo repo? Regards, Markus 2009/4/30 Markus Knauer < mkna...@eclipsesource.com > Very good timing... before I opened my mail reader today I started defining the PHP package, because this was still a todo item on my list. ;-) Regards, Markus 2009/4/30 Ian Skerrett < ian.skerr...@eclipse.org > Excellent. I just wanted to make sure you were watching the list. We should have more instructions tomorrow. From: Roy Ganor [mailto: r...@zend.com ] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:44 PM To: ian.skerr...@eclipse.org ; Nick Boldt Cc: mkna...@eclipsesource.com Subject: RE: PHP Package Hi Ian, Thanks for letting us know, as I understand Markus had to do few things before we actually come into play. I planned participating the EPP meeting today, but couldn’t make it (my country independence day J ). Anyway, I follow the EPP mailing list and will be happy to put things into place if needed. Thanks again, - Roy From: Ian Skerrett [mailto: ian.skerr...@eclipse.org ] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:36 PM To: 'Nick Boldt'; Roy Ganor Cc: mkna...@eclipsesource.com Subject: PHP Package Nick and Roy, Are you guys still interested in doing a PHP package references in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=238960 ? If so, I want to make sure you are following the EPP mailing list. We are going to be sending out some instructions to the package maintainers, so I wanted to make sure you didn’t miss them. Thanks Ian Ian Skerrett Director of Marketing Eclipse Foundation 613-224-9461 ext. 227 blog: ianskerrett.wordpress.com twitter: https://twitter.com/ianskerrett -- Markus Knauer EclipseSource ### phone: +49 721 664 733 0 (GMT +1) ### fax: +49 721 664 733 29 ### web: www.eclipsesource.com Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany General Manager: Jochen Krause Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883 -- Markus Knauer EclipseSource ### phone: +49 721 664 733 0 (GMT +1) ### fax: +49 721 664 733 29 ### web: www.eclipsesource.com Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany General Manager: Jochen Krause Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883 -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss, a division of Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling & Dash CBI http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:Nickb ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Re: [Dltk-dev] Re: [pdt-dev] Extending PHP language toolkit
Hi William, At the moment the simplest way to go is to inherit your source parser from PDT source parser and register it for PHP nature but with higher priority. Your code will be called for all files, you should process your PHPAspect files and pass everything else to the super class. There are plans to extend DLTK core framework with support of the language extensions/dialects but they are not implemented yet. Regards, Alex William Candillon wrote: Hi Andrey, It's also my intuition that I don't need my own language toolkit. However, when I remove the PHPAspect language toolkit I have the following problem: - The phpaspect content type is not recognized in the Script Explorer (it's recognized in eclipse default project explore). - The phpaspect files are build with php builder and not with phpaspect builder. Am I missing something in DLTK building model ? Best regards, William 2008/9/20 Andrey Platov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi William, Do you need to have your own language toolkit? For example in DLTK TCL there are ITcl and XOTcl subprojects, which extends basic IDE (and language) with Object-Oriented features. Can you please elaborate on your need for own language toolkit? Kind Regards, Andrey P.S. I'm crossposting to dltk-dev - Original Message - From: "William Candillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PDT Developers" Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:48:20 PM GMT +06:00 Almaty, Novosibirsk Subject: [pdt-dev] Extending PHP language toolkit Hello, I'm extending PDT 2.0 and my plugin defines its own language toolkit extending org.eclipse.dltk.core.AbstractLanguageToolkit. Unfortunately this disable PHP language toolkit. Is it possible to make both language toolkit to cohabit ? If a scripting project can only have one DLTK language toolkit, how can activate PHP/DLTK extension points (source parser, mixinparser etc) on my plugin project ? This issue seems important in order to extend PDT. Best regards, William -- William Candillon http://apdt.googlecode.com ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
