[PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-27 Thread John Collier
Agreed, Frederik. I think this is really important.

John

From: Frederik Stjernfelt [mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk]
Sent: April 26, 2015 6:41 PM
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; Peirce-L 1
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions,

ps - Peirce's three distinctions are subtypes of partial consideration -

F

Den 26/04/2015 kl. 18.37 skrev John Collier 
mailto:colli...@ukzn.ac.za>>
:


Gary,

I would say it is an abstraction from the perceptual judgment, where 
abstraction is understood as Locke's partial consideration. At least that is 
the way I seem to experience things myself. Perhaps others are different.

John


-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .






[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-26 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
ps - Peirce's three distinctions are subtypes of partial consideration -

F

Den 26/04/2015 kl. 18.37 skrev John Collier 
mailto:colli...@ukzn.ac.za>>
:

Gary,

I would say it is an abstraction from the perceptual judgment, where 
abstraction is understood as Locke’s partial consideration. At least that is 
the way I seem to experience things myself. Perhaps others are different.

John


-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .