Re: Re: Re: energy crises

2000-06-29 Thread GBK

But I do keep receiving messages!
This time when I finaly got connected I've got more than 100 of them. What
is wrong?

Boris

-Original Message-
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 27 ÉÀÎÑ 2000 Ç. 22:47
Subject: [PEN-L:20749] Re: Re: energy crises


Nordhaus assumed that there would always be an available "backstop"
technology.  I think that he had nukes in mind at the time.

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901




Re: [fla-left] Fw: Dying for Growth (fwd)

2000-06-21 Thread GBK

I am sorry, please don't forward anything unless it is really something
very, very, very important. My e-mail cannot download more than 5-10 mails
at a time. If I get too many messages I can't be properly connected and this
means putting me out of work for days.
Please, please, don't forward me any more files!

All the best,

Boris Kagarlitsky




-Original Message-
From: Michael Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 ÉÀÎÑ 2000 Ç. 15:18
Subject: [PEN-L:20456] [fla-left] Fw: Dying for Growth (fwd)


forwarded by Michael Hoover

 Common Courage Political Literacy Course -
 http://www.commoncouragepress.com
 +-+
  C O M M O N  C O U R A G E  P R E S S'
 Political Literacy Email Course
 A backbone of facts to stand up to spineless power.
 +-+
 Thursday June 8, 2000
 
 === Dying for Growth ===
 
   The ideology most responsible for promoting a vision of economic
growth
 as good in and of itself has also shaped development discourse and
policy
 choices among key international institutions since the late 1970s.
 Historically, this ideology has been known under various names:
 "neoliberalism," "the Washington consensus," "Reaganism," "the New Right
 Agenda," and "corporate-led economic globalization," to name a few. This
 view asserts that economic growth is by definition good for everyone and
 that economic performance is optimized when governments refrain from
 interfering in markets. Thus, for the good of all citizens, governments
 should grant the greatest possible autonomy to individual market
 actors--companies in particular. Unsurprisingly, the main advocates of
 neoliberal policies--governments of wealthy countries, banks,
 corporations, and investors--are those who have profited most handsomely
 from their application.
 
 The proponents of neoliberal principles argue that economic growth
 promoted in this way will eventually "trickle down" to improve the lives
 of the poor. Increasingly, however, such predictions have proved hollow.
 In many cases, economic policies guided by neoliberal agendas have
 worsened the economic situation of the middle classes and the poor.
Today,
 per capita income in more than 100 countries is lower than it was 15
years
 ago. At the close of two decades of neoliberal dominance in
international
 finance and development, more than 1.6 billion people are worse off
 economically in the late 1990s than they were in the early 1980s. While
 most of the worlds's poor are dying--in the sense of yearning--to reap
 some of the benefits of this growth, others are literally dying from the
 austerity measures imposed to promote it.
 
 --From "Dying for Growth: Global Inequality and the Health of the Poor,"
 edited Jim Young Kim, Joyce V. Millen, Alec Irwin, and John Gershman
 http://www.commoncouragepress.com/kim_growth.html

===
 ===
 Free Book Online: "Colombia," by Javier Giraldo
 
 This book, published by Common Courage Press in 1996, is no longer in
 print. However, in view of continuing violence in Colombia and recent
 proposals by the US Government to increase military aid, we are making
it
 freely available online.
 
 http://www.commoncouragepress.com/colombia/

===
 ===
 This is the free Political Literacy Course from Common Courage Press: A
 backbone of facts to stand up to spineless power.
 
 To subscribe (or unsubscribe) for free:
http://www.commoncouragepress.com
 
 Feedback/Title suggestions: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Missed any? Course archive:
http://www.commoncouragepress.com/course.html
 
 YES! This course is partly advertising for books. But it's also intended
 as political fertilizer: feel free to spread it around!
 __
 To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
 To subscribe to The Florida Left List, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Read messages you may have missed at

 http://www.egroups.com/group/floridaleft/




Re: Re: CNN on Graham

2000-06-21 Thread GBK

Please don't forward me anything unless it really concerns me. My e-mail
system can't download many files. This litterslly puts me out of work for
days!

All the best,

Boris

-Original Message-
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 ÉÀÎÑ 2000 Ç. 17:32
Subject: [PEN-L:20459] Re: CNN on Graham


Hi Steve:

Thanks Yoshie. Yeah, i see where it mentions Graham's bragging, but it
isn't the author stating that, it's the victim of his rape stating that he
had bragged about it to her. The article seemed to give pretty fair play
to the supporters of a new trial.

Yes, fairer than Wojtek, Kelley, Marc Cooper, etc.!

The momentum around the death penalty issue is amazing to me, something I
didn't think we were gonna see for a while.

This appeared in a conservative magazine:

*   NATIONAL REVIEW June 19, 2000 Issue
The Problem with the Chair.full text version
A conservative case against capital punishment.
By Carl M. Cannon, reporter and essayist for National Journal

http://www.nationalreview.com/19jun00/cannon-full061900.html   *

Yoshie