[PEN-L:8209] Re: Without Modern Communism The Workers And People

1997-01-13 Thread SHAWGI TELL


Bob, here is the original post.  There is no other post.  This is the 
only one dealing explicitly with Modern Communism.

Now, as for your question, "What is Modern Communism?", the answer, as 
I've already indicated, is contained in the post, in the second 
paragraph.  If you need elaboration, please be specific.


Bob asks:

Shawgi Tell;

What is modern Communism? Extremely interested in how it got their also.

Bob malecki

Why is it that not a day goes by without the bourgeoisie attacking
communism, through its media, think-tanks, universities and in a
million and one other ways? If communism is "finished," "dead,"
"utopian," "dictatorial," "totalitarian," "the antithesis of human
rights" and any number of other colorful epithets which come to
mind, what are imperialism and the bourgeoisie worried about? 
 The real issue is that imperialism and the bourgeoisie can only
continue to keep themselves in power so long as the working class
and all the forces in society which stand to gain from coming to
power themselves are confused about the significance of what is
going on in the society and their consequent line of march.  
The aim of the ideological and political confusion-making of the
bourgeoisie is to ensure that the workers, women, youth, students
and others do not seriously think about the causes of the problems
as they exist in the society and how to deal with them. The
bourgeoisie makes communism and the communist party the targets of
its attack because they are the main instruments of
enlightenment and of the new arrangements which are required to
open society's path for progress. 
   Modern Communism is the profound revolutionary condition for the
complete emancipation of the working class and all of humanity, in
which people are the creators of their own history. It emerges out
of the concrete conditions of capitalism in which production is
social but appropriation is private. It is this contradiction
between the character of production and the means of its
appropriation which is accentuating the contradiction which is
tearing the society apart - the contradiction between the
productive forces and the old moribund relations of production. The
condition of Modern Communism comes into being after a
thoroughgoing resolution of this contradiction. The stage of
socialism is the transition period between capitalism and
communism. But imperialism and the reactionary bourgeoisie present
Modern Communism as if it is a set of lunatic principles
conjured-up and imposed on the objective world by self-serving
power hungry maniacs or utopians who are simply out of tune with
the "harsh realities" of life
 In other words, without Modern Communism the workers and
people cannot find their bearings. The bourgeoisie does not want
people to embrace communism and the communist party for no other
reason than to keep them disoriented and unable to direct the
strength of their numbers and organization in a manner which
benefits them, not the bourgeoisie.


Shawgi Tell
University at Buffalo
Graduate School of Education
[EMAIL PROTECTED]













[PEN-L:8209] Re: Without Modern Communism The Workers And People

1997-01-13 Thread SHAWGI TELL


Bob, here is the original post.  There is no other post.  This is the 
only one dealing explicitly with Modern Communism.

Now, as for your question, "What is Modern Communism?", the answer, as 
I've already indicated, is contained in the post, in the second 
paragraph.  If you need elaboration, please be specific.


Bob asks:

Shawgi Tell;

What is modern Communism? Extremely interested in how it got their also.

Bob malecki

Why is it that not a day goes by without the bourgeoisie attacking
communism, through its media, think-tanks, universities and in a
million and one other ways? If communism is "finished," "dead,"
"utopian," "dictatorial," "totalitarian," "the antithesis of human
rights" and any number of other colorful epithets which come to
mind, what are imperialism and the bourgeoisie worried about? 
 The real issue is that imperialism and the bourgeoisie can only
continue to keep themselves in power so long as the working class
and all the forces in society which stand to gain from coming to
power themselves are confused about the significance of what is
going on in the society and their consequent line of march.  
The aim of the ideological and political confusion-making of the
bourgeoisie is to ensure that the workers, women, youth, students
and others do not seriously think about the causes of the problems
as they exist in the society and how to deal with them. The
bourgeoisie makes communism and the communist party the targets of
its attack because they are the main instruments of
enlightenment and of the new arrangements which are required to
open society's path for progress. 
   Modern Communism is the profound revolutionary condition for the
complete emancipation of the working class and all of humanity, in
which people are the creators of their own history. It emerges out
of the concrete conditions of capitalism in which production is
social but appropriation is private. It is this contradiction
between the character of production and the means of its
appropriation which is accentuating the contradiction which is
tearing the society apart - the contradiction between the
productive forces and the old moribund relations of production. The
condition of Modern Communism comes into being after a
thoroughgoing resolution of this contradiction. The stage of
socialism is the transition period between capitalism and
communism. But imperialism and the reactionary bourgeoisie present
Modern Communism as if it is a set of lunatic principles
conjured-up and imposed on the objective world by self-serving
power hungry maniacs or utopians who are simply out of tune with
the "harsh realities" of life
 In other words, without Modern Communism the workers and
people cannot find their bearings. The bourgeoisie does not want
people to embrace communism and the communist party for no other
reason than to keep them disoriented and unable to direct the
strength of their numbers and organization in a manner which
benefits them, not the bourgeoisie.


Shawgi Tell
University at Buffalo
Graduate School of Education
[EMAIL PROTECTED]