Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)

1997-12-12 Thread Rosenberg, Bill

Murray

!!!

Bill


 Forwarded message follows -

Date:  Thu, 11 Dec 1997 18:28:32+0100 
From:  jurriaan bendien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject:   Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd) 
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In response to Valis:

Yeah I know what you are talking about.  In New Zealand Muldoon set up the
Security Intelligence Service in the late 1970s and they used to spy on
campus, registering political science students among other things.  The
biggest laugh was when an SIS agent was spotted with a Penthouse in his
briefcase.  

If the Canadian Government is doing draconian things like you say, the
students should respond by collecting some personal information "without
requiring permission" on Canadian politicians, publish it, and see how the
politicians like it. What does the Canadian Government need this
information for anyway ? To breed a new generation of model compliant
citizens ?

In solidarity

Jurriaan.

PS - for a New Zealand link on this issue, try Murray Horton at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  He's knowledgable in that area. 

   The Ontario government is poised to give itself the power to collect
   and disclose private information about students - including medical
   problems, sexual orientation and religious beliefs -without requiring
   the students' permission.
 Etc, etc. etc.
 
 Hey, just what gives with Ontario, anyway?  Should we expect boat people
 any time soon?
 The political pox raging there somewhat resembles the unlamented Muldoon
 government in New Zealand during the Reaganzeit.
 
 I suspect that when Quebec becomes sovereign Canada will simply dissolve,
 and the money folks in Ontario are doing their renovations in advance.
 
 Any knowledgeable comment from up there?
   valis
 
/-\
|  Bill Rosenberg, Acting Director, Centre for Computing and Biometrics,  |
|P. O. Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Phone:(64)(03)3252-811  Fax:(64)(03)3253-865 |
\-/





Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)

1997-12-12 Thread Rosenberg, Bill

Sorry folks - just forwarded Juriaan's message to the list rather 
than its intended recipient!

Bill


/-\
|  Bill Rosenberg, Acting Director, Centre for Computing and Biometrics,  |
|P. O. Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Phone:(64)(03)3252-811  Fax:(64)(03)3253-865 |
\-/





Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)

1997-12-11 Thread valis

  The Ontario government is poised to give itself the power to collect
  and disclose private information about students - including medical
  problems, sexual orientation and religious beliefs -without requiring
  the students' permission.
Etc, etc. etc.

Hey, just what gives with Ontario, anyway?  Should we expect boat people
any time soon?
The political pox raging there somewhat resembles the unlamented Muldoon
government in New Zealand during the Reaganzeit.

I suspect that when Quebec becomes sovereign Canada will simply dissolve,
and the money folks in Ontario are doing their renovations in advance.

Any knowledgeable comment from up there?
  valis






Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)

1997-12-11 Thread jurriaan bendien

What's the story ?

Regards

Jurriaan

--
 From: Rosenberg, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)
 Date: Thursday, December 11, 1997 8:39 PM
 
 Murray
 
 !!!
 
 Bill
 
 
  Forwarded message follows -
 
 Date:  Thu, 11 Dec 1997 18:28:32+0100 
 From:  jurriaan bendien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Subject:   Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd) 
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 In response to Valis:
 
 Yeah I know what you are talking about.  In New Zealand Muldoon set up
the
 Security Intelligence Service in the late 1970s and they used to spy on
 campus, registering political science students among other things.  The
 biggest laugh was when an SIS agent was spotted with a Penthouse in his
 briefcase.  
 
 If the Canadian Government is doing draconian things like you say, the
 students should respond by collecting some personal information "without
 requiring permission" on Canadian politicians, publish it, and see how
the
 politicians like it. What does the Canadian Government need this
 information for anyway ? To breed a new generation of model compliant
 citizens ?
 
 In solidarity
 
 Jurriaan.
 
 PS - for a New Zealand link on this issue, try Murray Horton at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  He's knowledgable in that area. 
 
The Ontario government is poised to give itself the power to
collect
and disclose private information about students - including medical
problems, sexual orientation and religious beliefs -without
requiring
the students' permission.
  Etc, etc. etc.
  
  Hey, just what gives with Ontario, anyway?  Should we expect boat
people
  any time soon?
  The political pox raging there somewhat resembles the unlamented
Muldoon
  government in New Zealand during the Reaganzeit.
  
  I suspect that when Quebec becomes sovereign Canada will simply
dissolve,
  and the money folks in Ontario are doing their renovations in advance.
  
  Any knowledgeable comment from up there?
valis
  

/-\
 |  Bill Rosenberg, Acting Director, Centre for Computing and Biometrics, 
|
 |P. O. Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.  
|
 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Phone:(64)(03)3252-811  Fax:(64)(03)3253-865
|

\-/






Re: Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)

1997-12-11 Thread jurriaan bendien

In response to Valis:

Yeah I know what you are talking about.  In New Zealand Muldoon set up the
Security Intelligence Service in the late 1970s and they used to spy on
campus, registering political science students among other things.  The
biggest laugh was when an SIS agent was spotted with a Penthouse in his
briefcase.  

If the Canadian Government is doing draconian things like you say, the
students should respond by collecting some personal information "without
requiring permission" on Canadian politicians, publish it, and see how the
politicians like it. What does the Canadian Government need this
information for anyway ? To breed a new generation of model compliant
citizens ?

In solidarity

Jurriaan.

PS - for a New Zealand link on this issue, try Murray Horton at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  He's knowledgable in that area. 

   The Ontario government is poised to give itself the power to collect
   and disclose private information about students - including medical
   problems, sexual orientation and religious beliefs -without requiring
   the students' permission.
 Etc, etc. etc.
 
 Hey, just what gives with Ontario, anyway?  Should we expect boat people
 any time soon?
 The political pox raging there somewhat resembles the unlamented Muldoon
 government in New Zealand during the Reaganzeit.
 
 I suspect that when Quebec becomes sovereign Canada will simply dissolve,
 and the money folks in Ontario are doing their renovations in advance.
 
 Any knowledgeable comment from up there?
   valis
 





Big Brother: Bill 160 (fwd)

1997-12-10 Thread Sid Shniad

 Kitchener Waterloo Record
 
 15 November 1997
 
 Privacy fear raised over education bill
 By Luisa D'Amato
 
 The Ontario government is poised to give itself the power to collect
 and disclose private information about students - including medical
 problems, sexual orientation and religious beliefs -without requiring
 the students' permission .
 
 And a Kitchener high school  teacher, who is trying to mobilize protest
 against the provisions, calls them scary and much more harmful than the
 government's other controversial plans to cut teachers' preparation time
 and control class sizes. The government is "giving themselves absolute
 power to intrude into areas where they don't belong," said Rick Jones,
 who teaches electronics at Cameron Heights Collegiate in Kitchener.
 
 He discovered the provisions while studying Bill 160, the controversial
 legislation which centralizes control over education in Ontario and
 provoked a recent two-week teachers' strike.
 
 At the heart of the issue is Bill 160's plan to establish an Ontario
 education number for each student, which would be constant from
 kindergarten to post secondary education.
 
 Bill 160 which is awaiting third  reading in the Ontario legislature,
 says the minister of education or educational and training institutions
 "are authorized to collect, directly or indirectly, personal
 information" that could be accessed through the student numbers.
 
 "Personal information" is declared to be the same kind of information
 that is protected by Ontario's Freedom of Information and Protection
 of Privacy Act, Bill 160 says. That includes a person's name, address
 and telephone number, but also blood type, psychiatric history,
 political opinions, race, religion, financial transactions, fingerprint
 information and other types of information widely considered to be
 private.
 
 Bill 160 also gives the power to the education minister, or educational
 institutions, to "use or disclose" personal information in assigning an
 Ontario education number. It does not clarify to whom the disclosure may
 be made.
 
 Deborah Goldberg, legal counsel with the education ministry, acknowledged
 Friday that the proposed legislation gives government the power to delve
 into private information. But she said the power isn't intended to be
 used in a sinister way.
 
 The government's intention "is probably limited to things like name,
 address, phone number and marks," although she agreed that "the
 legislation doesn't say that". Goldberg said she's not an expert on the
 proposals for student numbers.  Ministry  officials who have been
 closely involved were not available for comment Friday.
 
 Provisions for collecting information are in the bill because, in order
 for schools to gather even such seemingly innocuous information as a
 student's address and phone number, Goldberg said, a statute has to be
 passed.
 
 Jones is bothered that there are no prescribed limits on what
 information could be collected or disclosed.  Nor does the bill give
 recourse to a student who doesn't want the  information collected or
 given out.
 
 In fact, nothing in the legislation says the student needs to be told
 personal information  about them is being gathered.
 
 Jones, a former business owner who says he voted for the Conservatives
 in the last election, says collecting some information might be a good
 thing.
 
 For example, if one knows which students don't have English as a first
 language, one could track them and test the effectiveness of different
 language-instruction methods, Jones said.
 
 But he can also see the potential for  "unbelievable abuse.  And there
 is nothing (in the legislation) to stop the abuse."