>From Sydney Morning Herald

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/03/21/1047749944836.html

The destruction of Safwan Hill was a priority for the attacking forces
because it had sophisticated surveillance equipment near the main highway
that runs from Kuwait up to Basra and then Baghdad. The attacking US and
British forces could not attempt to cross the border unless it was
destroyed.

Marine Cobra helicopter gunships firing Hellfire missiles swept in low from
the south. Then the marine howitzers, with a range of 30 kilometres, opened
a sustained barrage over the next eight hours. They were supported by US
Navy aircraft which dropped 40,000 pounds of explosives and napalm, a US
officer told the Herald.

A legal expert at the International Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva
said the use of napalm or fuel air bombs was not illegal "per se" because
the US was not a signatory to the 1980 weapons convention which prohibits
and restricts certain weapons. "But the US has to apply the basic principles
of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and take all precautions to protect
civilians. In the case of napalm and fuel air bombs, these are special
precautions because these are area weapons, not specific weapons," said
Dominique Loye, the committee's adviser on weapons and


Reply via email to