Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the U.S. Government -- FY2003,
page 48, Table 3-4, National Wealth
mbs
Almost all Intro texts include a section on types of business,
sales, etc.,
they they all show that propritors are numerous, but essentially
irrelevant
when it comes to sales and employment. The one text that used to
go beyond
this basic point was Heilbroner. He noted that ownership of assets, and
thus control of decision making, is more important than sales or
employment.
The last edition of his text indicated that 3600 firms with assets in
excess of $250M (0.018% of all firms) owned 80% of all business assets
in 1990.
I have tried to update these numbers several times, but I haven't been
able to get all the info necessary. Maybe Eric can help.
It is easy to get the number of firms by type. It is easy to get firms
with assets in excess of $250M. What I have not been able to nail down
is total business assets in the US. I have found total Corp. assets, but
I have not found proprietor and partnership assets.
Any ideas Eric?
Doug Orr
---
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 11:57:58 -0700
From: Eric Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:26609] 1,000 firms run the economy
Well not quite...
But data I just put in my spiffy text is:
Number of firms with 1-99 employees in the US: 4,800,582 (or 98% of all
firms with employees)
Number of firms with 10,000 or more employees: 936 (or 0.002% of all
firms with employees)
Number of employees working in firms with 1-99 employees:
40,091,449 (or 36%
of employees)
Number of employees working in firms with 10,000 or more employees:
29,715,945 (or 27% of employees)
That is, fewer than 1,000 firms control the labor of more than 25% of all
employees in the US economy. These same firms, of course, control a large
part of the surplus generated within the US economy also. A large
proportion
of workers, however, work for very small firms (less than 100
employees) but
none of these firms is really very important (economically, politically,
culturally, etc).
I would never argue a political strategy of pitting small firms
again the
giant firms. Rather, I point out the role of these giant firms to
underline
that way that the decisions of a relatively small number of firms
(over what
to make, what sort of jobs to provide, what ad campaigns to run,
etc) has a
really big impact on the whole economy.
Source http://www.census.gov/csd/susb/susb2.htm. US Census Bureau,
Statistics of US Businesses, 1999 data
Eric