RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Max Sawicky

How long was 'right away'?

suspiciously,
max


 Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy.  I was interviewed by
 a woman writing a book about the role of the hubby-bomber.  He makes it
 sound as if those who doubt his guilt think that the FBI planted the bomb.
 I doubt that many people believe that.  The only evidence against the FBI
 is that they were on the site right away.




RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:26750] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!





Michael Perelman writes: Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy. I was interviewed by a woman writing a book about the role of the hubby-bomber. He makes it sound as if those who doubt his guilt think that the FBI planted the bomb. I doubt that many people believe that. The only evidence against the FBI is that they were on the site right away.

couldn't the bombing have been by someone from the timber industry, while the FBI had such a good response time because they were surveilling the victims? Or maybe the FBI was happy to ignore the fact that some timber industry goon was bombing an official enemy? (It's like the Fibbies who infiltrated the KKK only to participate in its activities.)

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine





Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Perelman

That was my intuition.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
 Michael Perelman writes: Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious
 controversy.  I was interviewed by a woman writing a book about the role of
 the hubby-bomber.  He makes it sound as if those who doubt his guilt think
 that the FBI planted the bomb. I doubt that many people believe that.  The
 only evidence against the FBI is that they were on the site right away.
 
 couldn't the bombing have been by someone from the timber industry, while
 the FBI had such a good response time because they were surveilling the
 victims? Or maybe the FBI was happy to ignore the fact that some timber
 industry goon was bombing an official enemy? (It's like the Fibbies who
 infiltrated the KKK only to participate in its activities.)
 
 Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Perelman

I think that it was 5 minutes or so.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:47:08PM -0400, Max Sawicky wrote:
 How long was 'right away'?
 
 suspiciously,
 max
 
 
  Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy.  I was interviewed by
  a woman writing a book about the role of the hubby-bomber.  He makes it
  sound as if those who doubt his guilt think that the FBI planted the bomb.
  I doubt that many people believe that.  The only evidence against the FBI
  is that they were on the site right away.
 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Max Sawicky

I guess they could have been following them.
If not, it strikes me as pretty good evidence.

mbs


 I think that it was 5 minutes or so.
 
 On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:47:08PM -0400, Max Sawicky wrote:
  How long was 'right away'?
  
  suspiciously,
  max


 The only evidence 
 against the FBI
   is that they were on the site right away.