RE:Re: RE:Re: Re: Re: Re: Afghanistan class

2001-12-08 Thread jdevine 

Rakesh writes:There is an easy way to solve this, Jim. Just send the post in which 
you refer to both al Qaeda and its opponent the House of Sa'ud as fascists. I said 
that it seems that you have singled out al Qaeda. You could easily disprove me.

I see no reason to prove my political purity to someone who misrepresents my 
opionions. Please go away. 
JD

_
The simple way to read all your emails at ThatWeb
http://www.thatweb.com

Re: RE:Re: RE:Re: Re: Re: Re: Afghanistan class

2001-12-08 Thread Rakesh Bhandari 

Rakesh writes:There is an easy way to solve this, Jim. Just send 
the post in which you refer to both al Qaeda and its opponent the 
House of Sa'ud as fascists. I said that it seems that you have 
singled out al Qaeda. You could easily disprove me.

I see no reason to prove my political purity to someone who 
misrepresents my opionions. Please go away.
JD

Your posts are weird. I don't even know what political purity means. 
What do you mean by it? Forget the oath, just point me to a single 
post that  disproves that you have been selectively mis-using the 
charge of fascism, which after all is not an analytical concept but a 
justification for the use of unbridled violence in the suppression 
thereof.

Rakesh

Re: Re: RE:Re: RE:Re: Re: Re: Re: Afghanistan class

2001-12-08 Thread Michael Perelman 

I just got back online.  This thread still continues.  Please stop!

On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:08:39PM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
 Rakesh writes:There is an easy way to solve this, Jim. Just send 
 the post in which you refer to both al Qaeda and its opponent the 
 House of Sa'ud as fascists. I said that it seems that you have 
 singled out al Qaeda. You could easily disprove me.
 
 I see no reason to prove my political purity to someone who 
 misrepresents my opionions. Please go away.
 JD
 
 Your posts are weird. I don't even know what political purity means. 
 What do you mean by it? Forget the oath, just point me to a single 
 post that  disproves that you have been selectively mis-using the 
 charge of fascism, which after all is not an analytical concept but a 
 justification for the use of unbridled violence in the suppression 
 thereof.
 
 Rakesh
 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]