Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

2004-02-24 Thread Max B. Sawicky
yup.  very prolific guy.


-Original Message-
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jurriaan
Bendien
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger


Yep I have (though not all). He's great. Didn't he do that book
Anti-Samuelson ?

J.
- Original Message -
From: Max B. Sawicky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger


 Anybody ever read Marc Linder?



 -Original Message-
 From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andie
 nachgeborenen
 Subject: Fwd: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger




Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

2004-02-24 Thread Doug Henwood
Yes, and his stuff on time is great - overtime, break time, etc.
Moments are the elements of profit, as one of his titles says. I've
got a couple of interviews with him up at
http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Radio.html.
Doug

Michael Perelman wrote:

yes.  he does wonderful stuff.  I especially like Linder, Marc and
Ingrid Nygaard. 1998. .Void Where Prohibited: Rest Breaks and the Right
to Urinate on Company Time. (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press).
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:34:55PM -0500, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
 Anybody ever read Marc Linder?



 -Original Message-
 From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andie
 nachgeborenen
 Subject: Fwd: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu


Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

2004-02-24 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
I didn't realise that he had become a legal specialist in Iowa. I admire his
work at lot, even as I struggle with financial problems. The transition from
economics to law happens to quite a number of economists and I often wonder
what exactly motivates that, since, if you are an economist (which I am not,
my Master's was in education) then one would think that there are more
economically efficient methods for the administration of social justice than
legal stuff. But there does seem to be something in human nature as we know
it, which places limits on that. Michael Camdessus opined once that
economics is in our genes (jeans ?) but in fact, even in the investigation
of paid sex work, it is clear that human emotions do not truly have some
kind of economy, at most an ecology.

Bit of blog. I am personally inclined to the view that arbitrary violations
of legal rules are not desirable. But in my somewhat klutzy Forrest
Gump/Fight Club-type state I do engage in a bit of arbitrary behaviour, and
I got to curb that. Main criticisms I had were too much false alarm, too
much provocation, too much advertising. Sometimes it seems better not to
share insights for the sake of one's responsibility to fellow citizens so as
not to increase the volume of disappointment, which is ecologically
preferable.

Main thing about being more successful, is to get rid of past hurts and
grievances as quickly as one can, change behaviour to fit with new
circumstances, and just be kind, interesting and friendly to people and to
yourself. But it ain't easy, at least not for me, I have to somehow tear
myself out of past grief. Sociologically, Frederick Engels remarked upon the
historic memory and persistence of oppressed nationalities which causes the
struggle for justice by a people to continue for a very long time. But of
course it could be made into a happier kind of struggle (?). I had a woman
say of me once he still thinks he has to struggle, but I really felt there
was not much depth of insight there :-) I got to get another job to pay the
bills and get to where I want to go... economics still on my mind.

There is no depression in New Zealand
There are no sheep on our farms
There's no depression in New Zealand
We can all keep perfectly calm

- There's no depression in New Zealand, by Blam Blam Blam

J.


Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

2004-02-23 Thread Max B. Sawicky
Anybody ever read Marc Linder?



-Original Message-
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andie
nachgeborenen
Subject: Fwd: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger


Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

2004-02-23 Thread Michael Perelman
yes.  he does wonderful stuff.  I especially like Linder, Marc and
Ingrid Nygaard. 1998. .Void Where Prohibited: Rest Breaks and the Right
to Urinate on Company Time. (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press).

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:34:55PM -0500, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
 Anybody ever read Marc Linder?



 -Original Message-
 From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andie
 nachgeborenen
 Subject: Fwd: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu


Re: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger

2004-02-23 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
Yep I have (though not all). He's great. Didn't he do that book
Anti-Samuelson ?

J.
- Original Message -
From: Max B. Sawicky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger


 Anybody ever read Marc Linder?



 -Original Message-
 From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andie
 nachgeborenen
 Subject: Fwd: Why U.S. Labor Law Has Become a Paper Tiger