Re: Re: Re: Re: Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited

2003-02-04 Thread soula avramidis
 The trauma and awe of war is already having an economic impact on egypt where poverty levels are of concern. the devaluation of 15% in anticipation of the war raised the price level by about 15% and cut real wages. the IMF welcomed that.  the impact of that on the poor in this period of transition is but a daunting event.war kills by all means even before it actually happen.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The reports I read indicated that it was anti-army, but that may just beBS to cover up impending war crimes.On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:31:28PM -0800, joanna bujes wrote:> It's not an anti army thing; it's an anti population thing. It is meant to > traumatize to the point of unfeeling/unreaction.> > Joanna> > At 01:30 PM 02/03/2003 -0800, you wrote:> >Shock and awe would work if the Iraqis had their troops lined up in> >batallions or whatever. Supposedly, they are dispersing the troops, so> >the effort to isolate the army would not work.> > --> >Michael Perelman> >Economics Department> >California State University> >Chico, CA 95929> >> >Tel. 530-898-5321> >E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Michael PerelmanEconomics DepartmentCalifornia State UniversityChi!
co, CA 95929Tel. 530-898-5321E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Re: Re: Re: Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited

2003-02-03 Thread Michael Perelman
The reports I read indicated that it was anti-army, but that may just be
BS to cover up impending war crimes.

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:31:28PM -0800, joanna bujes wrote:
> It's not an anti army thing; it's an anti population thing. It is meant to 
> traumatize to the point of unfeeling/unreaction.
> 
> Joanna
> 
> At 01:30 PM 02/03/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >Shock and awe would work if the Iraqis had their troops lined up in
> >batallions or whatever.  Supposedly, they are dispersing the troops, so
> >the effort to isolate the army would not work.
> >  --
> >Michael Perelman
> >Economics Department
> >California State University
> >Chico, CA 95929
> >
> >Tel. 530-898-5321
> >E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Re: Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited

2003-02-03 Thread joanna bujes
It's not an anti army thing; it's an anti population thing. It is meant to 
traumatize to the point of unfeeling/unreaction.

Joanna

At 01:30 PM 02/03/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Shock and awe would work if the Iraqis had their troops lined up in
batallions or whatever.  Supposedly, they are dispersing the troops, so
the effort to isolate the army would not work.
 --
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited

2003-02-03 Thread Michael Perelman
Shock and awe would work if the Iraqis had their troops lined up in
batallions or whatever.  Supposedly, they are dispersing the troops, so
the effort to isolate the army would not work.
 -- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited

2003-02-03 Thread Tom Walker
>From AlterNet

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15027

Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited

By Gar Smith, AlterNet
January 27, 2003

Forget Osama. Forget Saddam. The Pentagon's newest target is the city of Baghdad.


U.S. military strategists have announced a plan to pummel Iraq with as many as 800 
cruise missiles in the space of two days. Many of
these missiles would rain down on Baghdad, a city of five million people. If George W. 
Bush gets the war he wants, Baghdad could
become the 21st century's Guernica.


On April 26, 1937, 25 Nazi bombers dropped 100,000 pounds of bombs and incendiaries on 
the peaceful Basque village. Seventy percent
of the town was destroyed and 1,500 people, a third of the population, were killed.


The Pentagon now predicts that the Iraq blitzkrieg could approximate the devastation 
of a nuclear explosion. "The sheer size of this
has never been ... contemplated before," one Pentagon strategist boasted to CBS News. 
"There will not be a safe place in Baghdad."


The Pentagon dubbed its cold-blooded attack plan "Shock and Awe," a bizarre 
conjunction of trauma and admiration.


The concept of Shock and Awe was first developed by the Pentagon's National Defense 
University (NDU) in 1996 as part of the "Rapid
Dominance" strategy. The strategy was first used in Afghanistan. In their 1996 NDU 
book, "Shock and Awe," authors Harlan K. Ullman
and James P. Wade wrote of the need to mount an assault with "sufficiently 
intimidating and compelling factors to force or otherwise
convince an adversary to accept our will."


With an unsettling air of appreciation, Ullman and Wade invoked the haunting images 
from "old photographs and movie or television
screens [depicting] the comatose and glazed expressions of survivors of the great 
bombardments of World War I. Those images and
expressions of shock transcend race, culture and history."


Shock and awe also were the emotions that Americans experienced on Sept. 11, 2001. 
Now, like the 9/11 terrorists, Bush and Co. are
planning a similar act of almost unparalleled ferocity – a devastating premeditated 
attack on a civilian urban population.


Bush seems determined to follow in the footsteps of Hulagu Khan and Tamerlane, the 
Mongol warlords who laid bloody waste to Baghdad
in 1258 and 1401.


But destroying Baghdad will not uncover hidden chemical, biological or nuclear weapons 
(if, in fact, any exist). Destroying Baghdad
will not capture, topple or kill Saddam Hussein. Shock and Awe's expressed goal is 
simple: in the words of Harlan Ullman, to destroy
the Iraqi people "physically, emotionally and psychologically."


Ironically, this was also the goal of the Nazi strategists who destroyed Guernica. The 
town had no strategic value as a military
target, but, like Baghdad, it was a cultural and religious center. Guernica was 
devastated to terrorize the population and break the
spirit of the Basque resistance.


Surely cruise missiles have been programmed to demolish the Baath Party Headquarters, 
presidential palaces and Republican Guard
compounds. But have missiles also been preset to obliterate the al-Qadiriya Shrine, 
the Tomb of Imam al-A'dham and the Mosque of
Sheik Abdul Qadir al-Ghailani?


We now know that there was no military need to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and 
Nagasaski. The detonations were intended to
demonstrate to the world – and to the Soviet Union, especially – that the U.S. had a 
functioning superweapon. Having sole possession
of "The Bomb" gave Washington the power to dominate post-war world politics.


Similarly, the destruction of Baghdad seems designed to underscore Bush's belligerent 
warning to the rest of the world: "You're
either with us or you're against us."


Washington's new National Security Strategy describes an America dominating the world 
militarily, politically and economically.


In a report published a month before the U.S. presidential elections, the conservative 
Project for the New American Century insisted
on instituting a "global U.S. pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power 
rival, and shaping the international security order
in line with American principles and interests."


This ringing endorsement of hyper-imperialism was co-authored by Dick Cheney, Donald 
Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby and Jeb
Bush, none of whom (with the one exception of Rumsfeld) ever volunteered for military 
service.


Today, thousands of citizen volunteers from around the world are converging in Iraq to 
stand as nonviolent "human shields" in hopes
of forestalling a U.S. assault. The brave men and women in this international "Peace 
Army" include anti-war activists, religious
witnesses, retirees, U.S. military veterans and members of families who lost loved 
ones in the September 11 attack.


Mr. Bush repeated