RE: one last message on the war

2002-01-08 Thread michael pugliese


Go to http://www.sfgate.com for a column from yesterday's San
Francisco Chronicle by Carolyn Lochead (off on the spelling there)
on the KSA. Public beheading of homosexuals and other nasty sheeit.
Michael Pugliese--- Original Message ---
>From: Rakesh Bhandari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: 1/8/02 1:46:00 AM
>

>I don't want any trouble with our govt--I am a loyal citizen--so
I am 
>making this public. I shall be offlists for months. Bye, Rakesh
>
>Mr Prescod:
>I want to add one thing: I *do* support the movement to incarcerate

>members of and freeze the assets of terrorist organizations,
and have 
>said so repeatedly.  Here I support the Bush team from the VP
to the 
>Pentagon chief to the National Security advisor in terms of
these 
>objectives. I have said so from the beginning, and say so again.
I am 
>over-joyed that they are FINALLY bringing these forces under
control, 
>and enthusiastic that Pakistan-supported terrorism in Kashmir
may be 
>contained which will make it easier I believe to resolve the
question 
>of the status and autonomy of JK.   I am utterly repulsed by
Osama 
>bin Laden, and feel confident that he would take the head of
a 
>socialist like me. But then I am  sure the Saudi royal family
would 
>be quite unkind  to me as well. The Saudi regime is a terrorist
one 
>whose twisted and sick offspring Osama bin Laden is. I tremble
at the 
>thought of being one of the millions of innocent people who
live in 
>the cross fire from that frighteningly arbitrary despotism and
that 
>twisted, women hating, repulsive terrorist organization.
>
>  I am arguing that the US needs to do what it can to allow
for the 
>development of democracy within Sa'udi Arabia, and I have been
very 
>disappointed that the administration has said so little on this

>front. Maybe it's doing something behind the scenes--do you
know? I 
>say this in hopes that in case you are not what you seem--that
is, 
>you are govt intelligence-- you do not question that I am a
loyal to 
>my fellow American citizens. It is in terms of our collective
safety 
>that I think it urgent the our govt makes use of its latent
power to 
>to open up the Gulf states and achieve a rapprochement with
the Iraqi 
>regime that allows the easing of the sanctions.  But I am afraid
as 
>was an army official in the WSJ  a few days ago that the Bush's

>administration links to oil companies  will make them too cautious
in 
>dealing with the royal family. I mean, aren't half of them (i
mean 
>the royal family, not the bush administration!) addicted to
hashish? 
>can't we push them around a bit?
>Rakesh
>
>




one last message on the war

2002-01-08 Thread Rakesh Bhandari

I don't want any trouble with our govt--I am a loyal citizen--so I am 
making this public. I shall be offlists for months. Bye, Rakesh

Mr Prescod:
I want to add one thing: I *do* support the movement to incarcerate 
members of and freeze the assets of terrorist organizations, and have 
said so repeatedly.  Here I support the Bush team from the VP to the 
Pentagon chief to the National Security advisor in terms of these 
objectives. I have said so from the beginning, and say so again. I am 
over-joyed that they are FINALLY bringing these forces under control, 
and enthusiastic that Pakistan-supported terrorism in Kashmir may be 
contained which will make it easier I believe to resolve the question 
of the status and autonomy of JK.   I am utterly repulsed by Osama 
bin Laden, and feel confident that he would take the head of a 
socialist like me. But then I am  sure the Saudi royal family would 
be quite unkind  to me as well. The Saudi regime is a terrorist one 
whose twisted and sick offspring Osama bin Laden is. I tremble at the 
thought of being one of the millions of innocent people who live in 
the cross fire from that frighteningly arbitrary despotism and that 
twisted, women hating, repulsive terrorist organization.

  I am arguing that the US needs to do what it can to allow for the 
development of democracy within Sa'udi Arabia, and I have been very 
disappointed that the administration has said so little on this 
front. Maybe it's doing something behind the scenes--do you know? I 
say this in hopes that in case you are not what you seem--that is, 
you are govt intelligence-- you do not question that I am a loyal to 
my fellow American citizens. It is in terms of our collective safety 
that I think it urgent the our govt makes use of its latent power to 
to open up the Gulf states and achieve a rapprochement with the Iraqi 
regime that allows the easing of the sanctions.  But I am afraid as 
was an army official in the WSJ  a few days ago that the Bush's 
administration links to oil companies  will make them too cautious in 
dealing with the royal family. I mean, aren't half of them (i mean 
the royal family, not the bush administration!) addicted to hashish? 
can't we push them around a bit?
Rakesh