[PEN-L] Political economy of art and culture

2007-12-03 Thread ann li

It's only taken as long as my finding a full-time job, and since I just
got my URPE newsletter, I am ready to make another foray into careerism.

I am finally getting my chapter on the political economy of art and
culture published next year in a critical anthology on the same subject,
so I am now interested in making a panel proposal for the 2009 ASSA
meetings in SF on the Political Economy of Art  Culture and hope
someone else might be interested in this idea.

Please contact me off list and/or forward this to interested parties.

Ann Li


Re: [PEN-L] Interesting Al-Jazeera video on Venezuela

2007-12-03 Thread Paul Zarembka

Interesting Al-Jazeera video on Venezuela


Thanks, Michael, for the link.  It sort of expressed my opinion that this
vote was a problem Chavez.

Actually, if it had passed by the same margin that it lost it may well have
been worse.  Anyway, I myself didn't like the unlimited term of office
proposal nor the Presidential ability to make appointments of regional
officials in the proposal.  I fought against a change to unlimited terms in
my own union, so why should I want it otherwise for Venezuela?  Before the
vote, Chavez himself said that this vote was a vote for or against him
personally -- not good.

The defeat for Chavez was even stronger in that the governmental exit polls
showed it passing.  That fact decreases somewhat the credibility of those
governmental polls.

I wonder what lessons Chavez and supporters of the Bolivarian process will
draw from this.  Chavez's announcement already today that he will try again
is not very encouraging.  He should have taken time to assess the lessons
learned.

I would like to make one statement: voting against this proposal should not
itself be interpreted that the person so voting is anti-socialist.  For
most such voters, that may be true, but not for all.

Paul Z.



(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001  a benchmark in 9/11 research
  video summary from Snowshoe Films at http://snowshoefilms.com
(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA
* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka


[PEN-L] analysis of Venezuelan referendum?

2007-12-03 Thread Jim Devine
does anyone have an special insight into the referendum's loss? Based
on pen-l discussions, it seemed to me that most of the opposition to
it came from the US...

--
Jim Devine / The radios blare muzak and newsak, diseases are cured every day /
the worst disease is to be unwanted, to be used up, and cast away. --
Peter Case (Poor Old Tom).


Re: [PEN-L] analysis of Venezuelan referendum?

2007-12-03 Thread Michael Perelman
I am disappointed that Chavez did not win.  In a sense, the term limits change 
in the
constitution was a confession of failure of the sort.  Like Paul Z., I am not a 
fan
of term limits, but the need to include the elimination of term limits in the
Constitution implied that Chavez knew that he had not prepared as a political
movement sufficient to carry on without him.

Admittedly, to do so would have been very difficult, but it is also very 
important.


--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com


[PEN-L] Fwd: News Alert: U.S. Says Iran Ended Nuclear Arms Work

2007-12-03 Thread Jim Devine
whew! (I hope)

The New York Times
Monday, December 3, 2007 -- 12:23 PM ET
-

U.S. Says Iran Ended Nuclear Arms Work

A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes
that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that
the program remains on hold, contradicting a previous
intelligence report.

Read More:
http://www.nytimes.com/?emc=na

Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
--
Jim Devine / The radios blare muzak and newzak, diseases are cured every day /
the worst disease is to be unwanted, to be used up, and cast away. --
Peter Case (Poor Old Tom).


Re: [PEN-L] analysis of Venezuelan referendum?

2007-12-03 Thread raghu
On Dec 3, 2007 9:23 AM, Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am disappointed that Chavez did not win.  In a sense, the term limits 
 change in the
 constitution was a confession of failure of the sort.  Like Paul Z., I am not 
 a fan
 of term limits, but the need to include the elimination of term limits in the
 Constitution implied that Chavez knew that he had not prepared as a political
 movement sufficient to carry on without him.

 Admittedly, to do so would have been very difficult, but it is also very 
 important.


The BBC is one of the more balanced Western news outlets. Here are a
couple of noteworthy items from their article:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7124313.stm
snip
For now, we couldn't do it, he said, repeating words he spoke after
his failed coup attempt in February 1992.

But he said he would continue to push his reform plans.

I will not withdraw even one comma of this proposal, this proposal is
still alive, he said.
.

Our correspondent says that some of Mr Chavez's loyal supporters have
gone against him on this occasion.

Though some of them may still support him, he says, they think he has
gone a little too far in a country which has a history of
dictatorships.

BBC Americas reporter Julian Miglierini says many analysts are
pointing to the abstention rate of 44%.

He says the bulk of those who abstained are thought to be Chavez
supporters who chose not to endorse the reforms, while voters backing
the opposition turned out in droves.


Re: [PEN-L] Political economy of art and culture

2007-12-03 Thread Michael Perelman
OK.  what was the job.  Are congratulations in order?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com


[PEN-L] National Bank of Canada

2007-12-03 Thread Paul Zarembka

Here is a video of the National Bank of Canada's experience with money
creation and debt from 1934, and seems to me to be a counter-example to the
libertarian argument I asked about before:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yYEFuN2v08

In other words, this seems to sustain the argument that central banking as
such is NOT the problem.

Does anyone know more about this experience?

Paul Z.


(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001  a benchmark in 9/11 research
  video summary from Snowshoe Films at http://snowshoefilms.com
(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA
* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka


[PEN-L] National Debt Grows $1 Million a Minute

2007-12-03 Thread Charles Brown
National Debt Grows $1 Million a Minute
By TOM RAUM,AP
Posted: 2007-12-03 12:16:45
Filed Under: Business News, Nation News, Politics News
WASHINGTON (Dec. 3) - Like a ticking time bomb, the national debt is an
explosion waiting to happen. It's expanding by about $1.4 billion a day
- or nearly $1 million a minute.

The national debt is $9.13 trillion, about$30,000 for every person in
the U.S. The total is worrisome because interest payments on the debt
strain government resources -- and things could get worse if the economy
slows down, as some economists predict.



http://news.aol.com/story/_a/national-debt-grows-1-million-a-minute/20071203092309990001?ncid=NWS000101


Re: [PEN-L] National Debt Grows $1 Million a Minute

2007-12-03 Thread Jim Devine
 National Debt Grows $1 Million a Minute
 By TOM RAUM, AP

 WASHINGTON (Dec. 3) - Like a ticking time bomb, the national debt is an
 explosion waiting to happen. It's expanding by about $1.4 billion a day
 - or nearly $1 million a minute.

One problem we have on the left is that we like the idea of crisis so
much that we sometimes fall under the influence on non-crises that are
disguised as crises. This is one of them.

 The national debt is $9.13 trillion, about $30,000 for every person in
 the U.S. The total is worrisome because interest payments on the debt
 strain government resources -- and things could get worse if the economy
 slows down, as some economists predict.

It should NOT be called the national debt. It's the _government's_
debt and about 75% of it is owed to people in the U.S. So 75% percent
of it should be consider part of the nation's assets. If you don't see
this, please e-mail me and I will give you my home address -- so you
can mail me your government bonds. If they're such a burden, I'll take
them off your hands.

The interest payments on the _government's_ debt do represent a
problem in the government's budget. (But remember than about 75% are
paid to people inside the U.S.!) The problem of interest payments is
not a problem in the short run, even if a recession hits, because the
Federal government can and does run deficits -- it does not have to
balance its budget. Smart economists and politicians don't force a
budget balance in a recession, since they know it makes matters worse.

Over the long haul, the economy grows, generating more  more tax
revenues for the government. These (along with tax hikes or spending
cuts) allow the government to pay interest. The problem occurs only if
the government debt grows _faster_ than the economy for several years,
so that the government debt to GDP ratio rises. But last time I
looked, the government debt was not at its previous peak (67% of GDP
in 1996, for gross debt). It was far below its previous peak (122% of
GDP) at the end of WW2. It's like 66% now. Note that the US economy
did very well during the 1950s, despite the debts left over from WW2.

The government's debt is going to be more of a problem in the future
if the medical-cost inflation problem isn't solved (because the
Federal government's Medicare costs rise with those of the private
sector), if the Bush tax cuts for the rich are not allowed to lapse,
if the Iraq war is allowed to continue and grow, and if the
alternative minimum tax problem (which is pushing more and more
middle-class people into rich-people tax brackets) is fixed without
compensating tax hikes.

Even so, the government's deficit would not be a problem if the
borrowing went to do something productive, i.e., that promotes the
growth of the economy. Examples include fixing New Orleans and
investing in public health and education. Of course, they government
squandered the borrowed money on tax cuts for the administration's
rich friends, and the effort to conquer Iraq.

Instead of worrying about the government's debt, worry about:

1. the way the government has wasted its borrowings (see above).

2. the severe debt loads that private consumers have -- and they,
unlike the US government, are likely to go bankrupt.

3. the increasing deficits of state and local governments, most of
which are forced by law to balance their budgets.

4. the deficit of services that are needed but the government does not provide.

5. global warming.

6. etc.
--
Jim Devine / The radios blare muzak and newzak, diseases are cured every day /
the worst disease is to be unwanted, to be used up, and cast away. --
Peter Case (Poor Old Tom).


Re: [PEN-L] National Debt Grows $1 Million a Minute

2007-12-03 Thread soula avramidis
what if foreigners that owned US paper and US finanacial instruments wanted to 
convert these papers into real assets inside the US.


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ