[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.14.4-225.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7KBClBsRhYa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-242.fc18, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SNq2S4188qa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-262.fc19, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=41uFPsDgVFa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-262.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.3-262.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fIq4xzDU8Ca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-242.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.3-242.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zkaaqZ06Vta=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #19 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #10) file maintainer, any idea? File in rawhide should detect Perl files better. I've run my regression tests ( https://fedorahosted.org/file-tests/ ) and saw only improvements between 5.11 and 5.14. Some Perl files previously detect as awk script, ASCII text are now properly detected as Perl5 module source, ASCII text. I have very limited understanding of interaction between File and rpmbuild. From what I know, rpmbuild checks all files using the File tool and try to match File output according to regexps in /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs (I'm testing that matching in my test-suite too). What happened here is that File probably (I don't have the old File installed right now to prove that) started reporting /usr/share/perl5/perl5db.pl as Perl script. Next thing is speculation, because I don't what exactly rpmbuild does when it finds some Perl file using File tool, but I think it probably checks for package X in that Perl File. And it finds this in our file: ./usr/share/perl5/perl5db.pl:package Carp;# Do not include us in the list That could explain why you see that particular Provides there. Please try to remove that file, do scratch-build and test the Provides to prove this theory. If it's true, I think it's rpmbuild bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vGiQOz81B1a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #20 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
The bogus provides are not coming for the %excluded Carp.pm, it comes form
/usr/share/perl5/perl5db.pl - and it is not the only one:
$ /usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov /usr/share/perl5/perl5db.pl
perl(Carp)
perl(DB) = 1.37
perl(DB::fake)
Some of the other extra provides are form other *.pl files.
My suggestion would be to add
.*/%{perl_archlib}/.*\\.pl$ and .*/%{perl_privlib}/.*\\.pl$
to __provides_exclude_from
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0GBIBcFkV2a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #21 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- So how about untag the perl -265 as a interim solution, until the proper solution will be figured out? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H3dafXVXlya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=v0TuTqPZgRa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #22 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Untagged, please wait for build root rotation: $ koji list-tag-history --build=perl-5.16.3-265.fc20 Fri Mar 22 16:48:47 2013: perl-5.16.3-265.fc20 tagged into f20 by ppisar Mon Mar 25 09:42:13 2013: perl-5.16.3-265.fc20 untagged from f20 by ppisar This issue has been caused by too optimistic dependency generator that started to get some new files due to improved `file' utility. Difference between 264 and 265 build roots: Removed packages: file-5.11-9.fc19.x86_64 file-libs-5.11-9.fc19.x86_64 libblkid-2.22.2-6.fc19.x86_64 libmount-2.22.2-6.fc19.x86_64 libuuid-2.22.2-6.fc19.x86_64 perl-5.16.3-263.fc20.x86_64 perl-Pod-Escapes-1.04-263.fc20.noarch perl-libs-5.16.3-263.fc20.x86_64 perl-macros-5.16.3-263.fc20.x86_64 util-linux-2.22.2-6.fc19.x86_64 Added packages: file-5.14-1.fc20.x86_64 file-libs-5.14-1.fc20.x86_64 libblkid-2.23-0.1.fc20.x86_64 libmount-2.23-0.1.fc20.x86_64 libuser-0.58-2.fc19.x86_64 libuuid-2.23-0.1.fc20.x86_64 perl-5.16.3-264.fc20.x86_64 perl-Pod-Escapes-1.04-264.fc20.noarch perl-constant-1.27-1.fc20.noarch perl-libs-5.16.3-264.fc20.x86_64 perl-macros-5.16.3-264.fc20.x86_64 util-linux-2.23-0.1.fc20.x86_64 It will be fixed in way suggested by Mattias Ellert (excluding some perl.spec files from dependency generator scanning). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PJ4NwXj7xca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #23 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #20)
The bogus provides [...] it comes form
/usr/share/perl5/perl5db.pl - and it is not the only one:
Confirmed.
Some of the other extra provides are form other *.pl files.
My suggestion would be to add
.*/%{perl_archlib}/.*\\.pl$ and .*/%{perl_privlib}/.*\\.pl$
to __provides_exclude_from
May-be I am missing something and am going to say something stupid, but IMO,
Provide: perl(...) should only be provided by *.pm's and not by *.pl's.
This would mean all *.pl's should be excluded from any perl()-provides
processing in rpm, in general.
Unfortunately file seems to have severe problems ins destinguishing perl
scripts from perl modules:
F20:
# file /usr/bin/automake
/usr/bin/automake: Perl5 module source, ASCII text
# file perl-5.16.3/lib/perl5db.pl
perl-5.16.3/lib/perl5db.pl: Perl5 module source, ASCII text
F18:
# file /usr/bin/automake
/usr/bin/automake: Perl script, ASCII text executable
# file perl-5.16.3/lib/perl5db.pl
perl-5.16.3/lib/perl5db.pl: awk script, ASCII text
Both results are wrong, but differently wrong ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a0Uql2tvB8a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jskar...@redhat.com Blocks||926037 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=irBvbe5gwea=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #24 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com --- It's still the same problem. File output is unreliable and I think it should not be used for use-cases where you really want to be sure. It will always detects some non-perl files as perl files and some perl files as non-perl files. For example, if you have Perl code in comment in C++ code, it will detect it as Perl. Currently Perl is detected using following two patterns: https://github.com/glensc/file/blob/master/magic/Magdir/perl#L29 . I don't know Perl so well to be able to write some regexp to detect typical Perl constructs which are not used by another languages. If you think you know how to significantly improve Perl detection while not breaking detection of other formants using what man magic provides, feel free to open bug with patch. What I could do is to increase the strength of shebang patterns, so it would detect /usr/bin/automake as Perl script again. The question is, what is the difference between Perl Module and Perl Script except the possible extension? Can Perl file with shebang contain Perl Module? If yes, we should detect it as Perl Module if there's package, otherwise we will not set Provides right again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Knoebms99ia=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||domi...@greysector.net --- Comment #25 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- *** Bug 927170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3rW1T6a0O3a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||914215 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j1yeghYSlga=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to comment #24) It's still the same problem. File output is unreliable and I think it should not be used for use-cases where you really want to be sure. Agreed. Rpm's file-type detection needs to be a multi-staged, heuristical process with (IMO) file being the last resort, in cases all else fail. What I could do is to increase the strength of shebang patterns, so it would detect /usr/bin/automake as Perl script again. IMO, this would be a step into the correct direction. The question is, what is the difference between Perl Module and Perl Script except the possible extension? The file name extension is the #1 distinction criterion. Additional ones are the shebang and yet another one is executable-permissions. However, there is a difference between the general case of guessing on a file's type and on processing a specific file in context of rpm and perl-modules (c.f. the next sentence) Can Perl file with shebang contain Perl Module? rpm-relevant perl-modules *must* be on the search-path provided through @INC (cf. perl -V) and *must* be named '*.pm' (cf. man perlmod). Though, I am not aware about perl prohibiting them to carry shebangs or these file to carry executable permission, they usually don't have either. Files named *.pl (such as the perl5db.pl case, here), however never are modules and therefore should never provide rpm perl()-provides. In other words, I think Matthias filter proposal could be extended to exclude all files on the @INC path not named '*.pm' from generating perl()'-provides, rsp. to let rpm only generate perl()-provs for files matching *.pm and being under @INC. [There is a corner case: While *.pls normally do not provide perl-modules, they may contain self-provided perl-modules] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xhZz6BkZbna=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #27 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com --- The question is, what is the difference between Perl Module and Perl Script except the possible extension? The file name extension is the #1 distinction criterion. Additional ones are the shebang and yet another one is executable-permissions. Right, but only the shebang is acceptable for File. It does not detect files according to names or permissions. But I agree that RPM should start by checking the extension in this case. However, there is a difference between the general case of guessing on a file's type and on processing a specific file in context of rpm and perl-modules (c.f. the next sentence) +1 Can Perl file with shebang contain Perl Module? rpm-relevant perl-modules *must* be on the search-path provided through @INC (cf. perl -V) and *must* be named '*.pm' (cf. man perlmod). Though, I am not aware about perl prohibiting them to carry shebangs or these file to carry executable permission, they usually don't have either. Ok, I will check some Perl files I have here to be really sure and detect anything with Perl shebang as Perl script in next File build. Files named *.pl (such as the perl5db.pl case, here), however never are modules and therefore should never provide rpm perl()-provides. As explained above, this should be handled by rpm, not by File. File detects the type of file according to its content. It will still says Perl module for .pl file if it does not have shebang and defines package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Dph02r6a1a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #28 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com --- I have create Bug 927211 to move RPM related part of this bug to RPM component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KleLmoLEkYa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- (In reply to comment #22) Untagged, please wait for build root rotation: This is not an acceptable solution. ;( Once a package has gone out in a rawhide compose it's installed on lots of machines, simply untagging it papers over the buildroot issue and skews the rawhide repo from reality, as well as many other packages that are built against it. Our policy is to never do this once it's gone out in a compose. Please fix. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NrKnbWJ0f2a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #30 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- (In reply to comment #29) (In reply to comment #22) Untagged, please wait for build root rotation: This is not an acceptable solution. ;( Once a package has gone out in a rawhide compose it's installed on lots of machines, simply untagging it papers over the buildroot issue and skews the rawhide repo from reality, as well as many other packages that are built against it. Our policy is to never do this once it's gone out in a compose. Please fix. ;) Something else that should be unacceptable is leaving rawhide in a semi broken state for three-four days including the weekend. And untagging has to be a valid workaround for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IdUlKceyHWa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #31 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- untagging is only a valid workaround if its needed to build the fix. untagging a build under any other situation is unacceptable. please fix properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oroxvCyOb5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||925761 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZoBcxdNCDba=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #12)
This simple patch seems to fix it here:
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 2db2cc9..16b7cb7 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
# intentionally (unversioned perl(DB) is removed and versioned one is kept)
%global __provides_exclude_from
.*/auto/.*\\.so$|.*/%{perl_archlib}/.*\\.so$|%{_docdir}
%global __requires_exclude_from %{_docdir}
-%global __provides_exclude perl\\((VMS|Win32|BSD::|DB\\)$)
+%global __provides_exclude perl\\((Carp|VMS|Win32|BSD::|DB\\)$)
# unicore::Name - it's needed by perl, maybe problem of rpm
Can folks confirm?
Well, to me, this patch is more a cludge to dampen the issue than an actual
fix.
I would rather see the cause (according to what other say a bug in file) fixed
instead of adding cludges, because I'd expect the actual bug will trigger
further similar issues elsewhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CzQi0QIzCWa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de --- (In reply to comment #14) I would rather see the cause (according to what other say a bug in file) fixed instead of adding cludges, because I'd expect the actual bug will trigger further similar issues elsewhere. Again, I don't think it is a bug in file. There used to be, and that was fixed, causing a bug here (perl specfile and/or rpm) to be uncovered now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GCOBN0NkhVa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hdego...@redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- *** Bug 927014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m2k1Ki1kbla=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #17 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- It seems to me that rpm is generating requires/provides using files that have been %exclude-d, and that is the underlying cause of the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oxmzPCl7H5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #18 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) I would rather see the cause (according to what other say a bug in file) fixed instead of adding cludges, because I'd expect the actual bug will trigger further similar issues elsewhere. Again, I don't think it is a bug in file. There used to be, and that was fixed, causing a bug here (perl specfile and/or rpm) to be uncovered now. I didn't say it's a bug in file, I am only saying this isn't a bug in perl.spec but is a bug elsewhere and mentioned file, because others pointed at it. I don't know the actual cause. FWIW: Rebuilding older perl-releases with current f20 receives the same bogus provides perl(Carp). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g4RCkcpstga=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||926996 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HhZhe74P46a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- With rebuilding perl-5.16.3-265 on f19, then $ rpmdiff --ignore T ./perl-5.16.3-265.fc19.i686.rpm ./perl-5.16.3-265.fc20.i686.rpm 21 | tee 30.txt removed REQUIRES perl-libs = 4:5.16.3-265.fc19 added REQUIRES perl-libs = 4:5.16.3-265.fc20 removed PROVIDES perl(x86-32) = 4:5.16.3-265.fc19 added PROVIDES perl(Carp) added PROVIDES perl(DB) = 1.37 added PROVIDES perl(DB::fake) added PROVIDES perl(bytes) added PROVIDES perl(utf8) added PROVIDES perl(x86-32) = 4:5.16.3-265.fc20 S.5 /usr/bin/a2p S.5 /usr/bin/perl S.5 /usr/bin/perl5.16.3 ..5 /usr/bin/perlbug ..5 /usr/bin/perlthanks S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/Config_heavy.pl S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/_h2ph_pre.ph ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/B/B.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Devel/PPPort/PPPort.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Devel/Peek/Peek.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/GDBM_File/GDBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Hash/Util/FieldHash/FieldHash.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Hash/Util/Util.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/I18N/Langinfo/Langinfo.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/IO/IO.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/IPC/SysV/SysV.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/MIME/Base64/Base64.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Math/BigInt/FastCalc/FastCalc.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/NDBM_File/NDBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/ODBM_File/ODBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Opcode/Opcode.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/POSIX/POSIX.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/encoding/encoding.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/mmap/mmap.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/scalar/scalar.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/via/via.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/SDBM_File/SDBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Storable/Storable.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Sys/Hostname/Hostname.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Sys/Syslog/Syslog.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Tie/Hash/NamedCapture/NamedCapture.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Time/HiRes/HiRes.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Unicode/Collate/Collate.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Unicode/Normalize/Normalize.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/arybase/arybase.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/attributes/attributes.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/mro/mro.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/re/re.so So something changed outside of perl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PIuNLOb7G5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- *** Bug 925969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5kELhUME1aa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Also, perl-5.16.3-264.fc20 does not provide perl(Carp), however rebuilding perl-5.16.3-264.fc20 with _current_ f20 now provides perl(Carp). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZKq1487i9fa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yan...@declera.com --- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- It seems to be an accidental %if/%endif breakage inroduced here http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl.git/commit/?id=b4857c8d7ca4f03d3bdd0e9fd885a5e8bdc1f96b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nTjkKZGT4za=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- Ok, sorry for the noise. This time I actually tested this and its the rawhide change from file-5.11-9 to file-5.14-1 that causes the change in provides -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PssPZi1Dkwa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tm...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de --- *** Bug 924882 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hhuPP3p9p7a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkal...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Well, - with first trying rpmbuild -bc perl-5.16.3-265.fc20 with file-5.11-9 - and rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit with the same file-5.11-9 does not show perl(Carp) - however now after upgrading file to 5.14-1 and rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit now adds perl(Carp) so definitely related to file rpm change. And rpm -qlp file-5.16.3-265.fc20.rpm | grep -v /usr/share/doc | /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides does not show perl(Carp) provides, so this seems related to rpm internal dependency generator. file maintainer, any idea? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S4CJu7TQG4a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de --- Imho the file package is not blame here. 5.11 misdetected Carp.pm as an AWK script, while 5.14 correctly says it is a Perl script. So what happens iiuc is (that despite the %exclude) RPMs internal dependency generator now considers Carp.pm for Perl provides (which it did not before), and so the perl(Carp) provides gets into the final RPM (and also some others). Or to say it differently: The bug fix in the file package uncovered a bug in the perl specfile, and some additional filters need to be added. As a side note, there could be a bug in the RPM dependency generator, which should probably ignore %excluded files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X28ueK6jUaa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
This simple patch seems to fix it here:
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 2db2cc9..16b7cb7 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
# intentionally (unversioned perl(DB) is removed and versioned one is kept)
%global __provides_exclude_from
.*/auto/.*\\.so$|.*/%{perl_archlib}/.*\\.so$|%{_docdir}
%global __requires_exclude_from %{_docdir}
-%global __provides_exclude perl\\((VMS|Win32|BSD::|DB\\)$)
+%global __provides_exclude perl\\((Carp|VMS|Win32|BSD::|DB\\)$)
# unicore::Name - it's needed by perl, maybe problem of rpm
# FCGI is external dependency after install of perl-CGI, remove it during RC
releases
%global __requires_exclude
perl\\((VMS|BSD::|Win32|Tk|Mac::|Your::Module::Here|unicore::Name|FCGI)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
Name: perl
Version:%{perl_version}
# release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be
broken otherwise
-Release:265%{?dist}
+Release:266%{?dist}
Epoch: %{perl_epoch}
Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
Group: Development/Languages
@@ -3327,6 +3327,9 @@ sed \
# Old changelog entries are preserved in CVS.
%changelog
+* Sat Mar 23 2013 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com - 4:5.16.3-266
+- No longer provide perl(Carp). (bug #924938)
+
* Fri Mar 22 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.16.3-265
- Conflict perl-autodie with older perl (bug #911226)
- Sub-package Env (bug #924619)
Scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5162650
Can folks confirm?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TME6n2QXpua=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Jeff Makey j...@makey.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@makey.net --- Comment #13 from Jeff Makey j...@makey.net --- perl-5.16.3-266.fc20.x86_64.rpm from the scratch build in Comment 12 requires but does not provide perl-Carp, so the latter is automatically installed by yum along with the former. This should solve the problems raised in this bug. There may be similar problems for the modules identified by this command sequence: (rpm -q --requires perl ; rpm -q --provides perl) | sort | uniq -d with the new RPM its output is this: perl(Config) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Math::BigInt) perl(Tie::Hash) perl(bytes) perl(charnames) perl(utf8) The list included perl(Carp) with the previous RPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uGqtIRd7f6a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Jeff Makey j...@makey.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||925121 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8hxtfQ6Tvsa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- What is worser, it breaks autoconf: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/watchlogs?taskID=5158977 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S4P59svE6Ra=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loganje...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- And it also breaks makeinfo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kN9rCaFJWua=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- *** Bug 925918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oSNktGvYcSa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
