Re: CPANTS is not a game.

[Philippe "BooK" Bruhat]

Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 21:56, Thomas Klausner écrivait:
> 
>   And no, I won't take the fun out of CPANTS.

Then why did you filter out the Acme modules from the prereq lists? Mmm?

For example, see http://cpants.perl.org/dist/Bot-MetaSyntactic 
and http://cpants.perl.org/dist/Acme-MetaSyntactic-RefactorCode

Both list Acme::MetaSyntactic as a prerequisite in Makefile.PL,
but it doesn't appear in the "Listed Prerequisites" nor in the
"Modules/pragmas/etc use'd by Acme-MetaSyntactic-RefactorCode" lists
(and therefore doesn't get its well earned is_prereq point).

Another side effect is that CPANTS gives false information.

-- 
 Philippe "BooK" Bruhat

 Out of the worst can often come the best.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #57 (Epic))

Re: CPANTS is not a game.

[Ovid]

- Original Message 
> From: David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> formatted.  E.g. I believe this is sufficient to get the Kwalitee point:
>
>  # t/pod_coverage.t
> __END__
> use Test::Pod::Coverage;

What?  You think that's bad?  Here are three lines from Acme::Code::Police:
  $trick_that_naughty_cpants_thingy_into_thinking_I_use_strict = <<'Ha, ha!';
  use strict;
  Ha, ha!Cheers,
Ovid
-- If this message is a response to a question on a mailing list, please send 
follow up questions to the list.
 
Web Programming with Perl -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/