Re: Capturing only STDERR with Capture::Tiny?

2011-12-01 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:25 AM, David Golden  wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Gabor Szabo  wrote:
 Does a request for such feature in Capture::Tiny sound reasonable?
>
> https://metacpan.org/source/DAGOLDEN/Capture-Tiny-0.12/Changes

Nice.

Thank you!

Gabor


Re: Capturing only STDERR with Capture::Tiny?

2011-12-01 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Gabor Szabo  wrote:
>>> Does a request for such feature in Capture::Tiny sound reasonable?

https://metacpan.org/source/DAGOLDEN/Capture-Tiny-0.12/Changes

-- David


Re: TB2::Mouse will be internal use only... with one hitch.

2011-12-01 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM, David E. Wheeler
 wrote:
> Yes, but I would view this as a symptom of a failure of core Perl more than 
> anything else. We really need a MOP and the attendant infrastructure and 
> syntax for classes, methods, and roles in the language. The alternative is 
> having to deal with issues like this.

+1 Amen!

-- David


Re: TB2::Mouse will be internal use only... with one hitch.

2011-12-01 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Nov 30, 2011, at 7:31 PM, brian d foy wrote:

> I'm not saying that you should dump Mouse, but when I see a design
> decision reach this far into the world (when nobody should have ever
> noticed it), I generally think it's time to consider if it was really a
> good idea. However, I have no experience with TB2 development.
> 
> As a person who will have to subclass TB2, I'm really not looking
> forward to any of this. I shouldn't have "to deal" or even know about
> the TB2 internals.

Yes, but I would view this as a symptom of a failure of core Perl more than 
anything else. We really need a MOP and the attendant infrastructure and syntax 
for classes, methods, and roles in the language. The alternative is having to 
deal with issues like this.

Best,

David