Re: Capturing only STDERR with Capture::Tiny?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:25 AM, David Golden wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: Does a request for such feature in Capture::Tiny sound reasonable? > > https://metacpan.org/source/DAGOLDEN/Capture-Tiny-0.12/Changes Nice. Thank you! Gabor
Re: Capturing only STDERR with Capture::Tiny?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: >>> Does a request for such feature in Capture::Tiny sound reasonable? https://metacpan.org/source/DAGOLDEN/Capture-Tiny-0.12/Changes -- David
Re: TB2::Mouse will be internal use only... with one hitch.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > Yes, but I would view this as a symptom of a failure of core Perl more than > anything else. We really need a MOP and the attendant infrastructure and > syntax for classes, methods, and roles in the language. The alternative is > having to deal with issues like this. +1 Amen! -- David
Re: TB2::Mouse will be internal use only... with one hitch.
On Nov 30, 2011, at 7:31 PM, brian d foy wrote: > I'm not saying that you should dump Mouse, but when I see a design > decision reach this far into the world (when nobody should have ever > noticed it), I generally think it's time to consider if it was really a > good idea. However, I have no experience with TB2 development. > > As a person who will have to subclass TB2, I'm really not looking > forward to any of this. I shouldn't have "to deal" or even know about > the TB2 internals. Yes, but I would view this as a symptom of a failure of core Perl more than anything else. We really need a MOP and the attendant infrastructure and syntax for classes, methods, and roles in the language. The alternative is having to deal with issues like this. Best, David