Re: anyone want to adopt Test::Tester?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6/26/14, 3:18 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * David Cantrell [2014-06-26T09:19:00] >> I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these >> days - and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so >> incompatibilities should never* happen. > > Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. > > Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict > the exact TAP that will be printed. > > I always recommend Test::Tester. I concur. Test::Tester's style of looking at the results as data, rather than as formatted stuff, is the way to go for most test testing. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTrbndAAoJEMUdZ0L/y3sDGTgH+gNRIG9x0nkLPQvsDVdcQbZ7 06UnghZb17K2O8Xt8U4KQt+lPFUb5xIk5vy3vGyN8bTrgLy2emWbyH7U4MLCu+Kp P3iK+CaSrPqf/8gZKNcLDhbus9V/58KNVa2QNjg1b2RFfJ7Of+yCGuX607MfRN/u CfGHtQmLzx/dkr/5pfDr0BylqhFGwwAnH/Hpgwu89jghmMLgc4tfN1lsC120dhsV 4g1g21/UNCC99E9/7SzQrmJs9difOWk3Svz2jsLXvlAvRCEIpJ3e/m7svx8pLRDB FI5ccYUNDqXDdB7DPwLDz40LmmGrSQ6i6JAYG+EvVOeD0WXQ/NwTf6dHWf2nnT8= =w0z9 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: anyone want to adopt Test::Tester?
On 27 June 2014 11:50, Fergal Daly wrote: > On 27 June 2014 07:18, Ricardo Signes wrote: >> * David Cantrell [2014-06-26T09:19:00] >>> I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - >>> and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should >>> never* happen. >> >> Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. >> >> Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact >> TAP that will be printed. >> >> I always recommend Test::Tester. > > :) > >> Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and >> make >> releases. > > Thanks Ricardo and Karen. > > Chad (who is making the changes in Test::Builder) has offered to take > it over and possibly bundle it with TB which would be nice and make it > easier for people to choose it. > > I'll give him the keys to the house shortly, Done. Thanks again, F > F > >> -- >> rjbs
Anybody wanna adopt Test::Class, Test::Exception & Test::Block
To join Fergal’s request for module adoption… My spare tuits are being spent in other places than perl development at the moment — and the ticket queue for my modules is building up a bit. If anybody is willing to take 'em over please drop me a line. Test::Class & Test::Exception are used a fair number of places. Test::Block is deprecated so shouldn’t need any input. T::C especially is used by lots of folk internally so new maintainer would have to keep an eye on backwards compatibility. Thanks, Adrian -- adri...@quietstars.com / +44 (0)7752 419080 / @adrianh / quietstars.com (CSSTWP.com the product team certification programme you can trust! ;-)
