[Encode] 1.69 Released

2002-05-04 Thread Dan Kogai 

I hope it was not too premature to release Encode-1.69, now available as 
follows.

Whole:
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/Encode-1.69.tar.gz and CPAN
Diff against current: 180 lines
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/current-1.69.diff.gz

And here are Changes

$Revision: 1.69 $ $Date: 2002/05/04 16:41:18 $
! lib/Encode/MIME/Header.pm
   Floating-point coerced for UNICOS (in integer arithmetics it folds
   line one character too early).  Verification by Mark is pending.
   Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
! Unicode/Unicode.pm
   more doc patch from Elizabeth
   Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
! Encode/Makefile_PL.e2x
   More platform-independent patch from Benjamin
   Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
! lib/Encode/Guess AUTHORS
   split regex fix by Graham Barr.  Adds him to AUTHORS.
   Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
! Encode/Makefile_PL.e2x
   enc2xs script discovery made smarter and more sensible, first cited
   by Miyagawa-kun and further suggestions by Rafael and Andreas
! Encode.pm lib/Encode/Guess.pm t/fallback.t t/guess.t t/mime-header.t
   "The EBCDIC remapping of the low 256 bites again" #16372 by jhi

UNICOS needs verification by Mark or others.  I am fairly sure of the 
cause of failure and equally sure of the fix.  But I am not sure if 
UNICOS groks what I mean...

Dan the Encode Maintainer

P.S.  I think we are very, very close to 5.8.0-RC1 but will we make it 
on May 8th so we can claim "we are only a month behind" ?

Re: InLanguage properties? [Was Re: Encode-InCharset-0.01 Released]

2002-05-04 Thread David Starner 

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 05:52:37PM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
>   To overcome this shortage Unicode does have character properties and 
> you can get which I

Re: InLanguage properties? [Was Re: Encode-InCharset-0.01 Released]

2002-05-04 Thread Stefan Persson 
 --- Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 04:33 , Roman Vasicek

> Notice it is prepended by InJISX0213_1 and
> InJISX0213_2.  Otherwise all
> Han Ideographs that are not used in Japanese will
> also be considered 
> Nihongo.

But there are ideographs not in JIS X 0213-1 that can be, but rarely are, used in Japanese. Also, I sometimes see dingbats and β on Japanese web pages.

StefanYahoo! Väder...
prognoser för 2000 platser i hela världen
http://se.weather.yahoo.com/