Re: Flex IMCC
At 6:10 PM +0100 1/21/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski wrote: Okay, I can be a bit slow, but I finally figured out what's going on with IMCC and OS X. imclexer.c is autogenerated (duh!) and flex, or whatever's being used to do it, spits out bad code. Could the IMCC folks upgrade to the latest version of flex to see if that fixes things and, if not, I'll hack up a post-processing program to make the output buildable. Could you be more precise in your error descriptions? Error message, file line # ... ;-) :-P It's a link-time error--yyin is multiply defined. If you are talking about the yyin, yyout thingy, this sould be fixed. Ths was a double define. Cool. I didn't see where in the source it was an issue, but I'm not intimately familiar with the quirks of flex. -- Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
Flex IMCC
Okay, I can be a bit slow, but I finally figured out what's going on with IMCC and OS X. imclexer.c is autogenerated (duh!) and flex, or whatever's being used to do it, spits out bad code. Could the IMCC folks upgrade to the latest version of flex to see if that fixes things and, if not, I'll hack up a post-processing program to make the output buildable. -- Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
Re: Flex IMCC
Dan Sugalski wrote: Okay, I can be a bit slow, but I finally figured out what's going on with IMCC and OS X. imclexer.c is autogenerated (duh!) and flex, or whatever's being used to do it, spits out bad code. Could the IMCC folks upgrade to the latest version of flex to see if that fixes things and, if not, I'll hack up a post-processing program to make the output buildable. Could you be more precise in your error descriptions? Error message, file line # ... ;-) If you are talking about the yyin, yyout thingy, this sould be fixed. Ths was a double define. leo
