Re: [perl #27962] [PATCH] bad error message for split.

2004-03-26 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:23:25AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
: At 11:01 PM -0500 3/25/04, Will Coleda wrote:
: Would a patch be accepted that let split work on non empty strings 
: (not treated as REs) as a stopgap until RE support?
: 
: Yep.

Especially since we'll be revising P6 split to do that as part of its
functionality anyway.  We're gonna try really hard not to confuse
regexes and strings in P6...

Larry


[perl #27962] [PATCH] bad error message for split.

2004-03-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by  Will Coleda 
# Please include the string:  [perl #27962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. 
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27962 


Here's an untested patch to fix the split op's warning.

Index: ops/string.ops
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/ops/string.ops,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -r1.15 string.ops
690c690
   internal_exception(1, Unimplemented join by regex);
---
internal_exception(1, Unimplemented split by regex);

--
Will Coke Coledawill at coleda 
dot com



Re: [perl #27962] [PATCH] bad error message for split.

2004-03-25 Thread Will Coleda
Would a patch be accepted that let split work on non empty strings (not 
treated as REs) as a stopgap until RE support?

On Thursday, March 25, 2004, at 10:51  PM, Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:

# New Ticket Created by  Will Coleda
# Please include the string:  [perl #27962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27962 
Here's an untested patch to fix the split op's warning.

Index: ops/string.ops
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/ops/string.ops,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -r1.15 string.ops
690c690
   internal_exception(1, Unimplemented join by regex);
---
  internal_exception(1, Unimplemented split by regex);
--
Will Coke Coledawill at coleda
dot com

--
Will Coke Coledawill at coleda 
dot com