Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [vtable stuff snipped] > I don't think it's too early to be dealing with the way variables are > implemented, at least at some level. I agree; I didn't mean for it to sound like I was saying otherwise. > Also, just because we do vtables under the hood doesn't mean that any port > of perl needs to do it that way--all that's required is to support the > exposed interface, and the vtable stuff is definitely in the "hidden guts" > realm. That's really my point---the interface should be documented outside of the implementation. I was just concerned because much of the internals has been C-specific thus far. -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C envi... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C envi... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Sam Tregar
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C envi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Hildo Biersma
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens