[perl #24614] multi times
# New Ticket Created by "Deon Atkins" # Please include the string: [perl #24614] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24614 > This transaction appears to have no content
Re: Another minor task for the interested
Dan Sugalski wrote: I was mostly thinking that some step or other in the Makefile has a dependency on that file, and some other step creates it, but the dependency's not explicit. I'd like to find the step(s) that require it and make it a dependency for them, then add in a dependency for the file for whatever step actually creates it, so things get ordered properly. It should (hopefully) be straightforward, but... I hope after this amount of time someone still wants this fixed. After much rummaging around I added the following to the makefile and it seems to be working up to 4 Jobs now. I think this may open up a few more problems though. Harry --- MakefileSat Dec 6 19:42:33 2003 +++ Makefile.new Sat Dec 6 18:29:07 2003 @@ -831,9 +831,9 @@ $(SRC)/core_ops_cg$(O): $(GENERAL_H_FILES) $(SRC)/core_ops_cg.c $(SRC)/core_ops_cgp$(O): $(GENERAL_H_FILES) $(SRC)/core_ops_cgp.c -$(SRC)/core_ops_cg.c $(INC)/oplib/core_ops_cg.h: $(OPS_FILES) $(BUILD_TOOL)/ops2c.pl lib/Parrot/OpsFile.pm lib/Parrot/Op.pm lib/Parrot/OpTrans/CGoto.pm +$(SRC)/core_ops_cg.c $(SRC)/runops_cores.c $(INC)/oplib/core_ops_cg.h: $(OPS_FILES) $(BUILD_TOOL)/ops2c.pl lib/Parrot/OpsFile.pm lib/Parrot/Op.pm lib/Parrot/OpTrans/CGoto.pm lib/Parrot/OpLib/core.pm $(PERL) $(BUILD_TOOL)/ops2c.pl CGoto --core -$(SRC)/core_ops_cgp.c $(INC)/oplib/core_ops_cgp.h: $(OPS_FILES) $(BUILD_TOOL)/ops2c.pl lib/Parrot/OpsFile.pm lib/Parrot/Op.pm lib/Parrot/OpTrans/CGP.pm +$(SRC)/core_ops_cgp.c $(INC)/oplib/core_ops_cgp.h: $(OPS_FILES) $(BUILD_TOOL)/ops2c.pl lib/Parrot/OpsFile.pm lib/Parrot/Op.pm lib/Parrot/OpTrans/CGP.pm lib/Parrot/OpLib/core.pm $(PERL) $(BUILD_TOOL)/ops2c.pl CGP --core
[perl #24616] Home loan rates as low as 1.96%
# New Ticket Created by "Monroe Mcdaniel" # Please include the string: [perl #24616] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24616 > Hello, Would you refinance if you knew you could save thousands? Have Funding for the Holidays Refinance today to as low as 1.5%! or buy the home of your dreams! http://www.a1s2d3f4g5.biz//form.asp?siteid=netmarketing-105 Thanks Jessica Johnson klbskulskk p rgzmf xa udbzkyupw ljdx pmk lboqvqfavmffwqtqzhag
Sorry 'bout the object delay
I got mugged by the flu, or something quite like it, on wednesday, and I'm still trying to stay up and running for more than a few hours at a stretch. (And digging out from the rubble of two kids who *aren't* sick :) Objects'll be the death of me, I swear... Anyway, I see there's more than one thing I left unaddressed and I'll try and get through all the pending p6i mail in the next day or so. -- Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
Missing branch instructions?
I've started referring to ops/ops.num, in an attempt to figure out why some of my pasm is getting rejected, and I've noticed a couple of points: There is an eq_p_i_ic and an eq_p_ic_ic, but not an eq_i_p_ic or an eq_ic_p_ic. So, I swapped the operands and it worked, but of course not on an lt statement, so I switched the operands and inverted the sense, only to find there are no such equivalents for ne, gt, and ge. There are also eq_ic_ic_ic, eq_nc_nc_ic, eq_sc_sc_ic instructions and similar for ne, lt, le, gt, and ge. Surely those should automatically be replaced with branch or no_op/omitted, so what are they for? Pete
