Re: >>OP<< [was: Re: Properties] [OT]
--- Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hodges) writes: > > I am not seeing unicode. > > Don't worry because, and I honestly don't mean this disparagingly - > by the time Perl 6 is ready for prime-time, you will. Larry got this one > right. lol -- I think you're right. And don't worry -- I don't take offense easily. When you're as bone-headed as me, you can't afford to. :) __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: >>OP<< [was: Re: Properties] [OT]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hodges) writes: > I am not seeing unicode. Don't worry because, and I honestly don't mean this disparagingly - by the time Perl 6 is ready for prime-time, you will. Larry got this one right. -- "Jesus ate my mouse" or some similar banality. -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
Re: >>OP<< [was: Re: Properties] [OT]
> And as far as I know, << and >> are exactly equivalent to æ?? and æ?? > in all cases. lol I get the idea, but I foresee these unicode bits as becoming an occasional sharp spot in my metaphorical seat of consciousness. :) I am not seeing unicode. __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
