Re: RFC Archive
At 08:27 AM 8/3/00 -0400, Tad McClellan wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:04PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: I'm about to push the button that will send my private set of RFCs off to the archive and mail them to perl6-announce. Fingers crossed. The RFC archive is at http://tmtowtdi.perl.org/rfc/ I suggest we zero-pad the RFC numbers for easy (string) sorting. But how many digits are we going to need? ... Figure six. If we blow that then I, for one, am outta here... :) Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
Re: RFC Archive
What about updating RFCs? Should I increment the version number and send each new revision to perl-rfc? Do I need to be careful about the RFC number when submitting updates? Also, I assumed the intention of the RFCs was to stimulate focused discussion and to keep a record of the decisions made during that discussion in the RFC. Is that true? Or, asked another way, is the maintainer of an RFC automatically responsible for tracking the related discussions and recording the decisions made in them?
Re: RFC Archive
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:04PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: In the future, if you want to submit an RFC mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only. The automated process will send it to the correct list as well as to -announce. This will also prevent perl6-librarian being CC:ed on followups. Well it would if the headers were set so the hitting reply would not add -announce and -librarian I would suggest a Reply-To being added to the RFCs as the are sent out. Graham.
Re: RFC Archive
Jonathan Scott Duff writes: In the future, if you want to submit an RFC mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only. http://tmtowtdi.perl.org/rfc/meta/ says that you should send your RFCs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] They go to the same place. However, I meant to only mention -rfc, so please excuse the brainfart of -librarian. Both work. Nat
