Rob Kinyon wrote:
> xOn 5/31/05, Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rob Kinyon wrote:
>> > I would love to see a document (one per editor) that describes the
>> > Unicode characters in use and how to make them. The Set implementation
>> > in Pugs uses (at last count) 20 different Unicode characters as
>> > operators.
>>
>> I have updated the unicode quickref, and started a Perlmonks discussion
>> node for this to be explored - see
>> http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=462246
>
> As I replied on Perlmonks, it would be more helpful if the Compose
> keys were listed and not just the ASCII versions. Plus, a quick primer
> on how to enable Unicode in your favorite editor. I don't know about
> Emacs, but the Vim documentation on multibyte is difficult to work
> with, at best.
Well, :help digraph isn't particularly bad, though the included table only
covers latin-1. The canonical source is RFC1345. But I've attached a patch
for the set symbols that have them.
> Thanks,
> Rob
Index: docs/quickref/unicode
===
--- docs/quickref/unicode (revision 4305)
+++ docs/quickref/unicode (working copy)
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@
Note that the compose combinations here are an X11R6 standard, and do not
necessarily correspond to the compose combinations available when you use your
"compose" key.
+
+The digraphs used in vim come from "Character Mnemonics & Character Sets",
+RFC1345 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1345.txt). After doing :set digraph,
+the digraph ^k A B may also be entered as A B.
Unicode ASCIIkey sequence
charfallbackVimEmacs Unix Compose Key combination
@@ -30,22 +34,22 @@
¥ Y ^k Y e C-x 8 Y Compose Y =
Set.pm operators (included for reference):
-≠ !=
-∩ *
-∪ +
+≠ != ^k ! =
+∩ * ^k ( U
+∪ + ^k ) U
∖ -
-⊂ <
-⊃ >
-⊆ <=
-⊇ >=
-⊄ !( $a < $b )
+⊂ < ^k ( C
+⊃ > ^k ) C
+⊆ <= ^k ( _
+⊇ >= ^k ) _
+⊄ !( $a < $b )
⊅ !( $a > $b )
⊈ !( $a <= $b )
⊉ !( $a >= $b )
-⊊ <
+⊊ <
⊋ >
-∋/∍ $a.includes($b)
-∈/∊ $b.includes($a)
+∋/∍ $a.includes($b) ^k ) -
+∈/∊ $b.includes($a) ^k ( -
∌!$a.includes($b)
∉!$b.includes($a)
@@ -58,20 +62,20 @@
So, these *might* be considered not too awful;
-× *
-¬ !
+× * ^k * X
+¬ ! ^k N O
∕ /
≡ =:=
≔ :=
⩴ or ≝ ::=
- ≈ or ≊~~
+ ≈ or ≊~~ ^k ? 2
… ...
-√ sqrt()
-∧ &&
-∨ ||
+√ sqrt() ^k R T
+∧ && ^k A N
+∨ || ^k O R
∣ mod (? bit of a stretch, perhaps)
- ⌈$x⌉ceil($x)
- ⌊$x⌋floor($x)
+ ⌈$x⌉ceil($x) ^k 7
+ ⌊$x⌋floor($x)^k 7 7
However I think it is a BAD idea that the following unicode characters
