Re: rakudobug failure

2019-05-13 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 13 May 2019, at 14:26, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I tried to report a failure to rakudobug, which generated the
> following report from the mailer:
> -
> ---
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> ** Message not delivered **
> 
> Your message couldn't be delivered to rakudo...@perl.org because the
> remote server is misconfigured. See technical details below for more
> information.
> 
> The response from the remote server was:
> 554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Access denied
> ---
> 
> Is that a temporary glitch, or has the procedure changed?

It didn’t register with me initially, but yes, the procedure has changed: RT is 
no longer being used for new Rakudo tickets.  Please use 
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues to report an issue.


Sorry for the confusion.


Liz

Re: rakudobug failure

2019-05-13 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
I would assume this is still fallout from the Perl NOC maintenance weeks.  Will 
pass this on to the people in the know.  Thanks for the report!

> On 13 May 2019, at 14:26, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I tried to report a failure to rakudobug, which generated the
> following report from the mailer:
> -
> ---
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> ** Message not delivered **
> 
> Your message couldn't be delivered to rakudo...@perl.org because the
> remote server is misconfigured. See technical details below for more
> information.
> 
> The response from the remote server was:
> 554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Access denied
> ---
> 
> Is that a temporary glitch, or has the procedure changed?
> 
> After we've dealt with that alligator, I can get back to the swamp. :-)*


rakudobug failure

2019-05-13 Thread Parrot Raiser
I tried to report a failure to rakudobug, which generated the
following report from the mailer:
-
---
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:59:32 -0700 (PDT)

** Message not delivered **

Your message couldn't be delivered to rakudo...@perl.org because the
remote server is misconfigured. See technical details below for more
information.

The response from the remote server was:
554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Access denied
---

Is that a temporary glitch, or has the procedure changed?

After we've dealt with that alligator, I can get back to the swamp. :-)*