Re: [petsc-users] set petsc matrix using input array

[Jed Brown]

Note that PETSc's formats are more space-efficient and faster than the
COO (triplet) format.  If you can produce triplet chunks instead of the
full matrix, you can add them incrementally to reduce the peak memory
usage.  Note that many preconditioners use storage similar to (or
greater than) a single assembled matrix, so copying (which is done
before preconditioner setup) may not increase the peak memory usage
(which is all that matters for capability).

"Smith, Barry F. via petsc-users"  writes:

>   Since PETSc does not use that format there, of course, has to be a time 
> when you have duplicate memory. 
>
>   Barry
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jan 9, 2020, at 12:47 PM, Sam Guo  wrote:
>> 
>> Dear PETSc dev team,
>>Suppose I have the matrix already in triplet format int int[] I, int[] J, 
>> double[] A, Is possible to create petsc matrix using A without copying? I 
>> like to avoid the duplicate memory if possible.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sam

Re: [petsc-users] set petsc matrix using input array

[Smith, Barry F. via petsc-users]

  Since PETSc does not use that format there, of course, has to be a time when 
you have duplicate memory. 

  Barry





> On Jan 9, 2020, at 12:47 PM, Sam Guo  wrote:
> 
> Dear PETSc dev team,
>Suppose I have the matrix already in triplet format int int[] I, int[] J, 
> double[] A, Is possible to create petsc matrix using A without copying? I 
> like to avoid the duplicate memory if possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sam

[petsc-users] set petsc matrix using input array

[Sam Guo]

Dear PETSc dev team,
   Suppose I have the matrix already in triplet format int int[] I, int[]
J, double[] A, Is possible to create petsc matrix using A without copying?
I like to avoid the duplicate memory if possible.

Thanks,
Sam