Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Upgrade
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 October 2003 19:15 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Upgrade Just to have this clear: pgAdmin3 1.0.0 branch will compile with both our own snapshot or with a reasonable wx cvs version (2003-10-01 is tested). If you don't use our snapshot, the clipboard won't work correctly under gtk. At the moment, we recommend using our wx snapshot, and we expect that this remain true in the future. pgAdmin3 cvs head requires a new wx cvs snapshot (2003-10-01, later might work also). Clipboard still won't work, but if you're using the cvs head you're probably developing/testing new things/ports and won't bother. I'm working on both - can I get another PC and second slackware box please? :-) Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile error
-Original Message- From: Adam H.Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 October 2003 23:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile error I get this when compiling a fresh CVS tree: utils/utffile.cpp: In member function `off_t wxUtfFile::Read(wxString, long long int)': utils/utffile.cpp:85: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC( wxStringBuffer, char*, long unsigned int)' /usr/local/wx2/include/wx/strconv.h:46: candidates are: virtual size_t wxMBConv::MB2WC(wchar_t*, const char*, long unsigned int) const make[2]: *** [utffile.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 You need the 20031001 wx snapshot from the wxWindows site. Currently we haven't patched it. Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Upgrade
-Original Message- From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 October 2003 08:31 To: Dave Page Cc: pgadmin-hackers Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Upgrade Le Jeudi 2 Octobre 2003 16:28, Dave Page a écrit : Add --enable-monolithic when you configure it to get the old single library. Thanks for the information. wxGTK 2.5.1 will be released this week-end. Therefore, it is high time I compile the official RPMs (which are not monolithic) today and hand them to the wxWindows team. OK. If you want something to do, perhaps you could look into what's required to get pgAdmin to build with a non-monolithic wx? I'm guessing it's just an appropriate patch to /acinclude.m4 This way, pgAdmin3 should be published by Linux vendors more quickly. Will get back to you during the day. Cool :-) BTW, we made Newsforge and apparently Segfault though I can't confirm that one, as well as a number of regional Linux sites... Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Upgrade
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2003 08:31 To: Dave Page Cc: pgadmin-hackers Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Upgrade Le Jeudi 2 Octobre 2003 16:28, Dave Page a crit : Add --enable-monolithic when you configure it to get the old single library. Thanks for the information. wxGTK 2.5.1 will be released this week-end. Therefore, it is high time I compile the official RPMs (which are not monolithic) today and hand them to the wxWindows team. OK. If you want something to do, perhaps you could look into what's required to get pgAdmin to build with a non-monolithic wx? I'm guessing it's just an appropriate patch to /acinclude.m4 Yes, just a patch to acinclude. I will take care of this one while I am fixing the -DSSL bug. ahp
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting dat
Andreas Pflug wrote: Godshall Michael wrote: I use linux at home and would test it there if I can get pgadminIII installed on it. Last time I tried it failed because I did not have ssl and crypto so.4 libraries. My Redhat 8.0 box has versions so.2. Maybe I downloaded the wrong version of pgadminIII. Adam, can't we link ssl and crypto static too? Alternatively, we'd have to distribute non-SSL versions too.. I'm not sure I follow. ahp ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting dat
Adam H. Pendleton wrote: Andreas Pflug wrote: Godshall Michael wrote: I use linux at home and would test it there if I can get pgadminIII installed on it. Last time I tried it failed because I did not have ssl and crypto so.4 libraries. My Redhat 8.0 box has versions so.2. Maybe I downloaded the wrong version of pgadminIII. Adam, can't we link ssl and crypto static too? Alternatively, we'd have to distribute non-SSL versions too.. I'm not sure I follow. Hi Adam, obviously the Redhat binary distribution needs dynamically linked libcrypto and libssl. IMHO we should spend the additional 10kb and have both libs statically linked to pgAdmin3, to avoid these dependencies. Or did Jean-Michel just forget to use --enable-static when building? AFAIR we confirmed that by default dynamic linking should be used, while our binary distributions should be as static as possible to minimize dependencies. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting
Andreas Pflug wrote: Hi Adam, obviously the Redhat binary distribution needs dynamically linked libcrypto and libssl. IMHO we should spend the additional 10kb and have both libs statically linked to pgAdmin3, to avoid these dependencies. Or did Jean-Michel just forget to use --enable-static when building? AFAIR we confirmed that by default dynamic linking should be used, while our binary distributions should be as static as possible to minimize dependencies. Okay, I will take a look at this again and see if the --disable-shared flag can statically link as much as possible. ahp ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Le Vendredi 3 Octobre 2003 17:52, Andreas Pflug a crit :
Or did Jean-Michel just forget to use --enable-static when building?
No, the packages use %configure --enable-debug --enable-static
--with-wx-config=%{withwxconfig}. And I can confirm that the SSL combo does
not display under RedHat 9.
So that distri isn't compiled for SSL.
Michael, did you use said binary package? If not, which did you use?
If Michael really did use that RH9 package, this would mean that
libcrypto and libssl are linked, but pgAdmin3 is SSL-disabled. This
certainly wouldn't make sense.
So if SSL is not defined, the ssl libs may not be linked to it either.
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displa ying/exporting dat
Le Vendredi 3 Octobre 2003 18:55, Godshall Michael a crit : So if SSL is not defined, the ssl libs may not be linked to it either. I can remember using an old snapshot with the SSL combo. The libraries should be installed on the build host. What is the name of the libraries needed? Cheers, Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displa
Title: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting dat
Hi,
I did download the binary(pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.i386.rpm). The folder on the mirror now only has a RedHat9.0 folder. I think it used to be named just RedHat but maybe I originally mis-read it.
I still have the rpm if that would help.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgadmin-hackers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam H. Pendleton
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III
displaying/exporting dat
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Le Vendredi 3 Octobre 2003 17:52, Andreas Pflug a crit :
Or did Jean-Michel just forget to use --enable-static when building?
No, the packages use %configure --enable-debug --enable-static
--with-wx-config=%{withwxconfig}. And I can confirm that the SSL combo does
not display under RedHat 9.
So that distri isn't compiled for SSL.
Michael, did you use said binary package? If not, which did you use?
If Michael really did use that RH9 package, this would mean that
libcrypto and libssl are linked, but pgAdmin3 is SSL-disabled. This
certainly wouldn't make sense.
So if SSL is not defined, the ssl libs may not be linked to it either.
Regards,
Andreas
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 October 2003 17:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: pgadmin-hackers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam H. Pendleton Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Bug in pgadmin III displaying/exporting So that distri isn't compiled for SSL. SSL is broken on Unix due to a build problem - see my email from this morning. Hopefully Adam will have a fix soon. Regards, Dave ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile error
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam H.Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2003 23:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile error I get this when compiling a fresh CVS tree: utils/utffile.cpp: In member function `off_t wxUtfFile::Read(wxString, long long int)': utils/utffile.cpp:85: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC( wxStringBuffer, char*, long unsigned int)' /usr/local/wx2/include/wx/strconv.h:46: candidates are: virtual size_t wxMBConv::MB2WC(wchar_t*, const char*, long unsigned int) const make[2]: *** [utffile.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 You need the 20031001 wx snapshot from the wxWindows site. Currently we haven't patched it. Regards, Dave. Does this mean that the CVS head from wxWindows doesn't work? ahp
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile error
Title: Message -Original Message-From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 October 2003 20:41To: Dave PageCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile errorDave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam H.Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2003 23:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS compile error I get this when compiling a fresh CVS tree: utils/utffile.cpp: In member function `off_t wxUtfFile::Read(wxString, long long int)': utils/utffile.cpp:85: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC( wxStringBuffer, char*, long unsigned int)' /usr/local/wx2/include/wx/strconv.h:46: candidates are: virtual size_t wxMBConv::MB2WC(wchar_t*, const char*, long unsigned int) const make[2]: *** [utffile.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 You need the 20031001 wx snapshot from the wxWindows site. Currently we haven't patched it. Regards, Dave. Does this mean that the CVS head from wxWindows doesn't work? Dunno about that, but that's the same error I got before upgrading to that snapshot from our previous one. Regards, Dave.
