Re: pgadmin4 for fedora 35
works, thx! On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 11:34, Dave Page wrote: > > Yeah, I managed to fat-finger the commit :-(. I've already fixed it, so > tonight's build should be good. > > Sorry about that. > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 9:39 AM toni incog wrote: >> >> Instatlled daily build 23/11 pgadmin4-fedora-repo.noarch and tried >> sudo dnf install pgadmin4-web >> ... >> >> Dependencies resolved. >> >> Package Architecture >> Version >> Repository Size >> >> Installing: >> pgadmin4-web noarch >> 6.2-1.fc35 >> pgAdmin48.7 k >> Installing dependencies: >> pgadmin4-server x86_64 >> 6.2-1.fc35 >> pgAdmin4 85 M >> postgresql14-libsx86_64 >> 14.1-1PGDG.f35 >> pgAdmin4277 k >> >> Transaction Summary >> >> Install 3 Packages >> >> Total download size: 85 M >> Installed size: 199 M >> Is this ok [y/N]: y >> Downloading Packages: >> (1/3): pgadmin4-web-6.2-1.fc35.noarch.rpm >> >>33 kB/s | 8.7 kB 00:00 >> (2/3): postgresql14-libs-14.1-1PGDG.f35.x86_64.rpm >> >> 619 kB/s | 277 kB 00:00 >> (3/3): pgadmin4-server-6.2-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm >> >> 6.0 MB/s | 85 MB 00:14 >> >> Total >> >> 6.0 MB/s | 85 MB 00:14 >> Running transaction check >> Transaction check succeeded. >> Running transaction test >> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful >> transaction. >> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. >> Error: Transaction test error: >> file /usr/lib/.build-id/fb/0ab37232a700c1fc92e0fd8e1a6193224b1749 >> from install of pgadmin4-server-6.2-1.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with file >> from package python3-3.10.0-1.fc35.x86_64 >> >> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 11:23, Dave Page wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 3:48 PM toni incog wrote: >> >> >> >> Lo and behold, I just upgraded a laptop to f35 with pgadmin4 still >> >> installed and it was enough to install python9 to get a running >> >> desktop version. So when upgrading don't rm pgadmin, disable the >> >> pgadmin repo and afterwards install python9. Not sure if that will >> >> work for the web version. >> > >> > >> > That's good to know - thanks for the info. >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 17:35, richard coleman >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Dave, >> >> > >> >> > Good to know, >> >> > >> >> > thanks, >> >> > rik. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:43 AM Dave Page >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:41 PM richard coleman >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Dave, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Have you ever considered using something like flatpak ( >> >> >>> https://flatpak.org/ ) for the Linux versions of pgAdmin? It might; >> >> >>> make it easier to handle the many different distributions, and deal >> >> >>> with the different release schedules of the many dependencies that >> >> >>> pgAdmin relies upon. >> >> >> >> >> >
Re: pgadmin4 for fedora 35
Instatlled daily build 23/11 pgadmin4-fedora-repo.noarch and tried sudo dnf install pgadmin4-web ... Dependencies resolved. Package Architecture Version Repository Size Installing: pgadmin4-web noarch 6.2-1.fc35 pgAdmin48.7 k Installing dependencies: pgadmin4-server x86_64 6.2-1.fc35 pgAdmin4 85 M postgresql14-libsx86_64 14.1-1PGDG.f35 pgAdmin4277 k Transaction Summary Install 3 Packages Total download size: 85 M Installed size: 199 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/3): pgadmin4-web-6.2-1.fc35.noarch.rpm 33 kB/s | 8.7 kB 00:00 (2/3): postgresql14-libs-14.1-1PGDG.f35.x86_64.rpm 619 kB/s | 277 kB 00:00 (3/3): pgadmin4-server-6.2-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm 6.0 MB/s | 85 MB 00:14 Total 6.0 MB/s | 85 MB 00:14 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib/.build-id/fb/0ab37232a700c1fc92e0fd8e1a6193224b1749 from install of pgadmin4-server-6.2-1.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with file from package python3-3.10.0-1.fc35.x86_64 On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 11:23, Dave Page wrote: > > Hi > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 3:48 PM toni incog wrote: >> >> Lo and behold, I just upgraded a laptop to f35 with pgadmin4 still >> installed and it was enough to install python9 to get a running >> desktop version. So when upgrading don't rm pgadmin, disable the >> pgadmin repo and afterwards install python9. Not sure if that will >> work for the web version. > > > That's good to know - thanks for the info. > >> >> >> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 17:35, richard coleman >> wrote: >> > >> > Dave, >> > >> > Good to know, >> > >> > thanks, >> > rik. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:43 AM Dave Page >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:41 PM richard coleman >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Dave, >> >>> >> >>> Have you ever considered using something like flatpak ( >> >>> https://flatpak.org/ ) for the Linux versions of pgAdmin? It might; >> >>> make it easier to handle the many different distributions, and deal with >> >>> the different release schedules of the many dependencies that pgAdmin >> >>> relies upon. >> >> >> >> >> >> Technologies like Flatpak make it significantly harder to maintain >> >> applications like pgAdmin, and for system administrators to ensure their >> >> systems are secure. This is primarily because they bundle third party >> >> libraries within the application package, which means that every time >> >> there is a security update to a library such as OpenSSL, we need to >> >> update the package we distribute, and the system administrator can't >> >> simply do a yum update or equivalent and be sure that their system is as >> >> secure as possible. It also means end users need to install a separate >> >> package management tool from the one that is native to their system. >> >> >> >> So, whilst (if we had the resources) I wouldn't object to supporting >> >> Flatpak and similar, I would certainly not want them to replace the >> >> standard native packages as the primary offering. >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Just a thought. >> >>>
Re: pgadmin4 for fedora 35
Lo and behold, I just upgraded a laptop to f35 with pgadmin4 still installed and it was enough to install python9 to get a running desktop version. So when upgrading don't rm pgadmin, disable the pgadmin repo and afterwards install python9. Not sure if that will work for the web version. On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 17:35, richard coleman wrote: > > Dave, > > Good to know, > > thanks, > rik. > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:43 AM Dave Page wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:41 PM richard coleman >> wrote: >>> >>> Dave, >>> >>> Have you ever considered using something like flatpak ( >>> https://flatpak.org/ ) for the Linux versions of pgAdmin? It might; make >>> it easier to handle the many different distributions, and deal with the >>> different release schedules of the many dependencies that pgAdmin relies >>> upon. >> >> >> Technologies like Flatpak make it significantly harder to maintain >> applications like pgAdmin, and for system administrators to ensure their >> systems are secure. This is primarily because they bundle third party >> libraries within the application package, which means that every time there >> is a security update to a library such as OpenSSL, we need to update the >> package we distribute, and the system administrator can't simply do a yum >> update or equivalent and be sure that their system is as secure as possible. >> It also means end users need to install a separate package management tool >> from the one that is native to their system. >> >> So, whilst (if we had the resources) I wouldn't object to supporting Flatpak >> and similar, I would certainly not want them to replace the standard native >> packages as the primary offering. >> >>> >>> >>> Just a thought. >>> >>> rik. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 4:23 AM Dave Page wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:11 AM toni incog wrote: >>>>> >>>>> fwiw That didn't work out. Symlinks where pointing to 3.9 though I >>>>> stopped at Failed to exec Python script file >>>>> '/usr/pgadmin4/web/pgAdmin4.wsgi'... ModuleNotFoundError: No module >>>>> named 'flask' >>>> >>>> >>>> :-(. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I guess I've to practice some patience. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, unfortunately. The issue is that one of the upstream libraries we >>>> use doesn't have a release that supports Python 3.10 yet. We have all the >>>> build system etc. setup and ready to go, but until they put out a new >>>> release we're kinda stuck. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 10:01, toni incog wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Ok, then I give that a try, thx! >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:56, Dave Page >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:34 AM Aditya Toshniwal >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:28 PM toni incog >>>>> > >> wrote: >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> No easy way to fallback to python 3.9 in f35? 3.9 is installable >>>>> > >>> fwiw >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> I'm not aware of any. @Dave do you have any ? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > The F34 packages might work if you have 3.9 installed (I *think* the >>>>> > > symlinks in our venv should still point to the correct locations in >>>>> > > that case). There may be other things that don't work though. >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:17, Aditya Toshniwal >>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > Hi Toni, >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > All of the python pack
Re: pgadmin4 for fedora 35
fwiw That didn't work out. Symlinks where pointing to 3.9 though I stopped at Failed to exec Python script file '/usr/pgadmin4/web/pgAdmin4.wsgi'... ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'flask' I guess I've to practice some patience. On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 10:01, toni incog wrote: > > Ok, then I give that a try, thx! > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:56, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:34 AM Aditya Toshniwal > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:28 PM toni incog wrote: > >>> > >>> No easy way to fallback to python 3.9 in f35? 3.9 is installable fwiw > >> > >> I'm not aware of any. @Dave do you have any ? > > > > > > The F34 packages might work if you have 3.9 installed (I *think* the > > symlinks in our venv should still point to the correct locations in that > > case). There may be other things that don't work though. > > > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:17, Aditya Toshniwal > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi Toni, > >>> > > >>> > All of the python packages used by pgAdmin are not yet available for > >>> > 3.10. We're continuously testing pgAdmin on v3.10 to make it work. > >>> > Once pgAdmin works on v3.10, F35 builds can be made available. > >>> > > >>> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 6:35 PM toni incog wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> No yum repos for f35 yet. Using the 34 repos has troubles with f35 > >>> >> python3.10. Any fast solution for this? Is installing python3.9 an > >>> >> option. I'm not familiar with this pyhton world but became dependend > >>> >> on pgadmin4. > >>> >> > >>> >> thx > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > Aditya Toshniwal > >>> > pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | edbpostgres.com > >>> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Aditya Toshniwal > >> pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | edbpostgres.com > >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > > > > > > > > -- > > Dave Page > > VP, Chief Architect, Database Infrastructure > > Blog: https://www.enterprisedb.com/dave-page > > Twitter: @pgsnake > > > > EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Re: pgadmin4 for fedora 35
Ok, then I give that a try, thx! On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:56, Dave Page wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:34 AM Aditya Toshniwal > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:28 PM toni incog wrote: >>> >>> No easy way to fallback to python 3.9 in f35? 3.9 is installable fwiw >> >> I'm not aware of any. @Dave do you have any ? > > > The F34 packages might work if you have 3.9 installed (I *think* the symlinks > in our venv should still point to the correct locations in that case). There > may be other things that don't work though. > >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:17, Aditya Toshniwal >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Toni, >>> > >>> > All of the python packages used by pgAdmin are not yet available for >>> > 3.10. We're continuously testing pgAdmin on v3.10 to make it work. >>> > Once pgAdmin works on v3.10, F35 builds can be made available. >>> > >>> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 6:35 PM toni incog wrote: >>> >> >>> >> No yum repos for f35 yet. Using the 34 repos has troubles with f35 >>> >> python3.10. Any fast solution for this? Is installing python3.9 an >>> >> option. I'm not familiar with this pyhton world but became dependend >>> >> on pgadmin4. >>> >> >>> >> thx >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks, >>> > Aditya Toshniwal >>> > pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | edbpostgres.com >>> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | edbpostgres.com >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > > > > -- > Dave Page > VP, Chief Architect, Database Infrastructure > Blog: https://www.enterprisedb.com/dave-page > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Re: pgadmin4 for fedora 35
No easy way to fallback to python 3.9 in f35? 3.9 is installable fwiw On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:17, Aditya Toshniwal wrote: > > Hi Toni, > > All of the python packages used by pgAdmin are not yet available for 3.10. > We're continuously testing pgAdmin on v3.10 to make it work. > Once pgAdmin works on v3.10, F35 builds can be made available. > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 6:35 PM toni incog wrote: >> >> No yum repos for f35 yet. Using the 34 repos has troubles with f35 >> python3.10. Any fast solution for this? Is installing python3.9 an >> option. I'm not familiar with this pyhton world but became dependend >> on pgadmin4. >> >> thx >> >> > > > -- > Thanks, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | edbpostgres.com > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
pgadmin4 for fedora 35
No yum repos for f35 yet. Using the 34 repos has troubles with f35 python3.10. Any fast solution for this? Is installing python3.9 an option. I'm not familiar with this pyhton world but became dependend on pgadmin4. thx
Re: no rpm for 4.14?
That's a long conference On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 14:01, toni incog wrote: > > thx, appreciated! > > On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 13:49, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 12:41 +0200, toni incog wrote: > > > can't wait:) > > > > Upstream released 4.14 during PGCone.EU, where the packagers, etc were busy > > at > > the conference. Will take a look at earliest convenience. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Devrim Gündüz > > Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer > > Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Re: no rpm for 4.14?
thx, appreciated! On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 13:49, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > > > Hi, > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 12:41 +0200, toni incog wrote: > > can't wait:) > > Upstream released 4.14 during PGCone.EU, where the packagers, etc were busy at > the conference. Will take a look at earliest convenience. > > Regards, > -- > Devrim Gündüz > Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer > Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
no rpm for 4.14?
can't wait:)
Re: no rpms for 4.13?
Sry, I'm on fedora 30. latest as in 4.13? Can't see 4.13 in: https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/11/fedora/fedora-30-x86_64/ dnf list pgadmin4* ... PostgreSQL 11 30 - x86_64 63 kB/s | 716 kB 00:11 Installed Packages pgadmin4.x86_64 4.12-1.f30 @pgdg11 pgadmin4-docs.noarch 4.12-1.f30 @pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-flask-htmlmin.noarch 1.5.0-1.f30@pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-flask-migrate.noarch 2.4.0-1.f30@pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-psutil.x86_64 5.5.1-1.f30@pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-six.noarch 1.12.0-3.f30 @pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-sshtunnel.noarch 0.1.4-1.f30@pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-werkzeug.noarch 0.15.4-1.f30 @pgdg11 pgadmin4-pytz.noarch 2018.9-1.f30 @pgdg11 pgadmin4-web.noarch 4.12-1.f30 @pgdg11 Available Packages pgadmin4-desktop-common.x86_64 4.12-1.f30 pgdg11 pgadmin4-desktop-gnome.noarch 4.12-1.f30 pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-flask.noarch 1:1.0.2-1.f30 pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-flask-login.noarch 0.4.1-1.f30pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-flask-paranoid.noarch 0.2-1.f30.1pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-simplejson.x86_64 3.16.0-1.f30 pgdg11 pgadmin4-python3-wtforms.noarch 2.2.1-1.f30pgdg11 thx On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 14:52, Fahar Abbas wrote: > Hi Toni! > > Can you please share the steps to reproduce and operating system? > > I can see latest pgadmin4 rpm on Rhel 7. > > Steps to test: > > 1.Now install pg repo: > yum install > https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/10/redhat/rhel-7-x86_64/pgdg-redhat10-10-2.noarch.rpm > 2. yum clean all > 3. yum install epel-release* > 4. yum install pgadmin4* > > Kind Regards, > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 5:00 PM toni incog wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > -- > Fahar Abbas > QMG > EnterpriseDB Corporation > Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874 > Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803 > Mobile: +92-333-5409707 > Skype ID: *live:fahar.abbas* > Website: www.enterprisedb.com >
no rpms for 4.13?
Re: rpm stuck at v4.8
This is not to like: sudo dnf update Error: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package pgadmin4-web-4.8-1.f30.noarch - nothing provides python3-werkzeug >= 0.15.4 needed by pgadmin4-web-4.10-1.f30.noarch dnf list python3-werkzeug python3-werkzeug.noarch 0.14.1-7.fc30@fedora any easy solution?
Re: rpm stuck at v4.8
Appreciated. Thanks for making pgadmin4 better. I'm getting used to it and starting to like it. On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote: > > Thanks! > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 2:10 PM Devrim Gündüz wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 12:41 +0200, toni incog wrote: >> > Any chance on a fresh release for fedora30? >> >> I did not release 4.9 intentionally, because 4.10 was near. Pushed packages, >> they will be in the repos in 15 mins. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Devrim Gündüz >> Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer >> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR > > > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
rpm stuck at v4.8
Any chance on a fresh release for fedora30? thx
