pgsql: Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.

2019-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.

This test already knew that, to get stable test output, it had to hide
"loops" counts in EXPLAIN ANALYZE results.  But that's not nearly enough:
if we get a smaller number of workers than we planned for, then the
"Workers Launched" number will change, and so will all the rows and loops
counts up to the Gather node.  This has resulted in repeated failures in
the buildfarm, so adjust the test to filter out all these counts.

(Really, we wouldn't bother with EXPLAIN ANALYZE at all here, except
that currently the only way to verify that executor-time pruning has
happened is to look for '(never executed)' annotations.  Those are
stable and needn't be filtered out.)

Back-patch to v11 where the test was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11952.1569536...@sss.pgh.pa.us

Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE

Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0baa55655e0549cf19fcfdb007c3250f7d4761a9

Modified Files
--
src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out | 196 +-
src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql  |  16 ++-
2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)



pgsql: Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.

2019-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.

This test already knew that, to get stable test output, it had to hide
"loops" counts in EXPLAIN ANALYZE results.  But that's not nearly enough:
if we get a smaller number of workers than we planned for, then the
"Workers Launched" number will change, and so will all the rows and loops
counts up to the Gather node.  This has resulted in repeated failures in
the buildfarm, so adjust the test to filter out all these counts.

(Really, we wouldn't bother with EXPLAIN ANALYZE at all here, except
that currently the only way to verify that executor-time pruning has
happened is to look for '(never executed)' annotations.  Those are
stable and needn't be filtered out.)

Back-patch to v11 where the test was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11952.1569536...@sss.pgh.pa.us

Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE

Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9de7ea6aca5a394dbddac4b13b475b313e352b3f

Modified Files
--
src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out | 196 +-
src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql  |  16 ++-
2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)



pgsql: Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.

2019-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.

This test already knew that, to get stable test output, it had to hide
"loops" counts in EXPLAIN ANALYZE results.  But that's not nearly enough:
if we get a smaller number of workers than we planned for, then the
"Workers Launched" number will change, and so will all the rows and loops
counts up to the Gather node.  This has resulted in repeated failures in
the buildfarm, so adjust the test to filter out all these counts.

(Really, we wouldn't bother with EXPLAIN ANALYZE at all here, except
that currently the only way to verify that executor-time pruning has
happened is to look for '(never executed)' annotations.  Those are
stable and needn't be filtered out.)

Back-patch to v11 where the test was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11952.1569536...@sss.pgh.pa.us

Branch
--
master

Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4ea03f3f4eba3c76abae2e69bf48c921799a68a3

Modified Files
--
src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out | 196 +-
src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql  |  16 ++-
2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)



pgsql: Fix compilation with older OpenSSL versions

2019-09-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Fix compilation with older OpenSSL versions

Some older OpenSSL versions (0.9.8 branch) define TLS*_VERSION macros
but not the corresponding SSL_OP_NO_* macro, which causes the code for
handling ssl_min_protocol_version/ssl_max_protocol_version to fail to
compile.  To fix, add more #ifdefs and error handling.

Reported-by: Victor Wagner 
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier 
Discussion: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20190924101859.09383b4f%40fafnir.local.vm

Branch
--
master

Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4e6f101e921c9a7ff4e7fff847966b9cdd390753

Modified Files
--
src/backend/libpq/be-secure-openssl.c | 48 +--
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



pgsql: Fix compilation with older OpenSSL versions

2019-09-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Fix compilation with older OpenSSL versions

Some older OpenSSL versions (0.9.8 branch) define TLS*_VERSION macros
but not the corresponding SSL_OP_NO_* macro, which causes the code for
handling ssl_min_protocol_version/ssl_max_protocol_version to fail to
compile.  To fix, add more #ifdefs and error handling.

Reported-by: Victor Wagner 
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier 
Discussion: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20190924101859.09383b4f%40fafnir.local.vm

Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE

Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a430c7b4afe8278223541d3efee2281ee9135c1d

Modified Files
--
src/backend/libpq/be-secure-openssl.c | 48 +--
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)