Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles
On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 12:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:44:10AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html > > Description: > > > > The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and > > privileged. The title suggests that a user should expect to be assigned > > these roles. "21.5 Sub-Administrator Roles" would be accurate--improving > > clarity over all and removing any need to explain why postgres is not in > > this list of roles. > > > > Good points. I have developed the attached documentation patch which > includes your ideas. +1 I think that "predefined role" is better than "default role". Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Re: Put cluster in the hierarchy in 22.1
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 03:35 +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/manage-ag-overview.html > Description: > > 22.1 says "So the full hierarchy is: server, database, schema, table (or > some other kind of object, such as a function)." Could "cluster" be added in > there for completeness sake? "So the full hierarchy is: server, cluster, > database, schema, table (or some other kind of object, such as a function)." > It might be nice to have a graphic showing the relationships, adding other > things as well: columns, constraints, triggers, etc. "Server" and "cluster" are synonymous here. Perhaps we should include "cluster" in parentheses behind "server". Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
