Consistent reference to RFCs in the documentation
When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have some as while others are not. The attached patch adds ulinks for all RFC's and marks subsequent mentions as acronym to make the docs consistent. It also spells all as "RFC " with a whitespace as that was the most commonly used spelling (there is no RFC for how to reference to an RFC so we're free to choose). In order to make review easier I haven't fixed linelengths/wrapping, but am happy to do that in case this is deemed something we want. cheers ./daniel 0001-docs-ulink-all-references-to-RFC-s.patch Description: Binary data
Possible Example Error in Documentation
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/plpgsql-transactions.html Description: We are using Postgres 12. When I use the example given for transaction_test1() from the documentation here: https://www.postgresql.org/account/comments/new/12/plpgsql-transactions.html/, the procedure is created without incident. However, when I attempt "CALL transaction_test1();", I receive the "invalid transaction termination" error. Please correct the documentation if the example is flawed, or add an explanation on the page if we need to set specific environment variables. Thank you.
Re: Possible Example Error in Documentation
PG Doc comments form writes: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/plpgsql-transactions.html > Description: > We are using Postgres 12. When I use the example given for > transaction_test1() from the documentation here: > https://www.postgresql.org/account/comments/new/12/plpgsql-transactions.html/, > the procedure is created without incident. However, when I attempt "CALL > transaction_test1();", I receive the "invalid transaction termination" > error. Hmm, it works for me. regards, tom lane
