RE: index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views

2020-11-30 Thread Shinya11.Kato
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views point to the "Viewing
>>> Statistics" section, but not to the dedicated section (e.g., "ANALYZE
>>> Progress
>>> Reporting") for each view. IMO this is very inconvenient when finding
>>> the section describing each pg_stat_progress_xxx view, from the index.
>>> So what about adding new pointer to the section for each view in the index?
>>> Patch attached.
>>>
>>> BTW, other stats views have both pointers in the index.
>>
>> When setting an , it's better to set the zone attribute to 
>> indicate
>which section it's associated with.
>>
>> For example,
>>   
>> pg_stat_progress_analyze
>>   
>
>Thanks for the review!
>
>I was thinking that the zone attribute doesn't need to be specified because the
>indexterm is defined under the section that the indexterm tries to point to. 
>You
>can see the same situation at, for example, the section and indexterm of
>pg_stat_database. If I'm missing something, could you tell me why the zone
>attribute is necessary in this case?

I looked at lines 132-137 of monitoring.sgml, and I saw that zone is set for 
indexterm after .
However, I haven't found the zone set for indexterm after , so you may 
be right.

Regards,
Shinya Kato




Re: index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views

2020-11-30 Thread Fujii Masao




On 2020/12/01 13:26, shinya11.k...@nttdata.com wrote:

Hi,

The index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views point to the "Viewing
Statistics" section, but not to the dedicated section (e.g., "ANALYZE
Progress
Reporting") for each view. IMO this is very inconvenient when finding
the section describing each pg_stat_progress_xxx view, from the index.
So what about adding new pointer to the section for each view in the index?
Patch attached.

BTW, other stats views have both pointers in the index.


When setting an , it's better to set the zone attribute to indicate

which section it's associated with.


For example,
   
 pg_stat_progress_analyze
   


Thanks for the review!

I was thinking that the zone attribute doesn't need to be specified because the
indexterm is defined under the section that the indexterm tries to point to. You
can see the same situation at, for example, the section and indexterm of
pg_stat_database. If I'm missing something, could you tell me why the zone
attribute is necessary in this case?


I looked at lines 132-137 of monitoring.sgml, and I saw that zone is set for 
indexterm after .
However, I haven't found the zone set for indexterm after , so you may 
be right.


So you agree not to add zone attribute in this case?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION




RE: index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views

2020-11-30 Thread Shinya11.Kato
> Hi,
>
> The index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views point to the
> "Viewing Statistics" section, but not to the dedicated section
> (e.g., "ANALYZE Progress
> Reporting") for each view. IMO this is very inconvenient when
> finding the section describing each pg_stat_progress_xxx view, from the
>index.
> So what about adding new pointer to the section for each view in the
>index?
> Patch attached.
>
> BTW, other stats views have both pointers in the index.

 When setting an , it's better to set the zone attribute
 to indicate
>>> which section it's associated with.

 For example,

  pg_stat_progress_analyze

>>>
>>> Thanks for the review!
>>>
>>> I was thinking that the zone attribute doesn't need to be specified
>>> because the indexterm is defined under the section that the indexterm
>>> tries to point to. You can see the same situation at, for example,
>>> the section and indexterm of pg_stat_database. If I'm missing
>>> something, could you tell me why the zone attribute is necessary in this 
>>> case?
>>
>> I looked at lines 132-137 of monitoring.sgml, and I saw that zone is set for
>indexterm after .
>> However, I haven't found the zone set for indexterm after , so you may
>be right.
>
>So you agree not to add zone attribute in this case?

Yes, I think it's nice.

Regards,
Shinya Kato