Among PostgreSQL instances there is only one master. But yes, each server may
be considered master by the clients because it's Pgpool-II will redirect write
queries to the actual master. Maybe it's even better to avoid this unnecessary
traffic between servers and decide which Pgpool-II is in front of the master on
the client side, but this is optional.
Dnia 8 października 2024 07:30:05 GMT+04:00, Ron Johnson
napisał/a:
>On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:04 PM wrote:
>
>> Hello. I have a PostgreSQL high availability cluster with Pgpool-II, but I
>> don't use the virtual IP feature so my clients don't know which node to
>> send queries to. DNS round-robin is not a solution because it can't
>> distinguish between healthy and dead nodes.
>>
>> I thought about having a Pgpool-II instance on each client (client
>> Pgpool-II -> cluster Pgpool-II -> PostgreSQL), but AFAIK it can't
>> distribute write queries. I also know that libpq may have multiple nodes to
>> connect, but I need an advanced health check because a node may have
>> connectivity but be separated from the whole cluster so it must be
>> considered dead.
>>
>
>Isn't that multi-master clustering?
>
