[GENERAL] Fwd: createdb but revoke dropdb
Sleep often seems a better problem solver than thinking. Create databases ahead of time and assign at the appropriate time. Begin forwarded message: From: Ben Eliott Date: 2 March 2010 18:22:17 GMT To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: createdb but revoke dropdb Hi, In using 8.3. I'm trying to set up programmatic database creation but is there a way that the user creating the databases can be restricting from dropping them? I have two roles, 'adminuser' with createdb permission, and 'dbuser' a user with CRUD privileges. adminuser is a member of the dbuser role, this seems to allow adminuser to createdb databases for dbuser with: createdb -U adminuser -O dbuser new_database_name Adding .pgpass to the linux user's home directory allows createdb to work without additional user input. But now it seems the linux user also has dropdb privileges. How can i restrict this? Perhaps there is a recommended method to disable dropdb? Can anyone suggest? The adminuser has no login privileges so by removing dropdb this should remove the possibility for any hacker chaos other than creating more databases? Thanks in advance for any advice, Ben
Re: [GENERAL] createdb but revoke dropdb
On 02/03/10 18:22, Ben Eliott wrote: I have two roles, 'adminuser' with createdb permission, and 'dbuser' a user with CRUD privileges. adminuser is a member of the dbuser role, this seems to allow adminuser to createdb databases for dbuser with: createdb -U adminuser -O dbuser new_database_name Adding .pgpass to the linux user's home directory allows createdb to work without additional user input. But now it seems the linux user also has dropdb privileges. How can i restrict this? Perhaps there is a recommended method to disable dropdb? Can anyone suggest? From the SQL reference page for "GRANT" "The right to drop an object, or to alter its definition in any way, is not treated as a grantable privilege; it is inherent in the owner, and cannot be granted or revoked. (However, a similar effect can be obtained by granting or revoking membership in the role that owns the object; see below.) The owner implicitly has all grant options for the object, too." Don't make "dbuser" the owner of the database, make "adminuser" the owner, then grant whatever top-level privileges dbuser needs. Make sure you don't have adminuser as an automatic login through .pgpass The adminuser has no login privileges so by removing dropdb this should remove the possibility for any hacker chaos other than creating more databases? Or deleting/modifying all your data, presumably. If you don't trust the linux user account, don't give it automatic login. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] FSM and VM file
On 02/03/10 21:47, akp geek wrote:
I am doing a replication of one of the database and the size of the slave
database is growing exponentially . Right now the size of master db is 849M
and the slave is 7GB.
my master is 8.3 and slave is 8.4
I'm guessing your slave isn't being vacuumed. Or, perhaps you have a
long-running transaction on the slave that is preventing dead rows from
being cleaned up.
Two useful commands:
vacuum verbose mytable;
This will show you how many rows/pages can/should be cleaned up.
SELECT pg_size_pretty( pg_total_relation_size('mytable') );
This will show you the size of "mytable" (formatted nicely).
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] createdb but revoke dropdb
Hi, Thank-you for coming back and your advice. I understand what you mean. However, in order to run the script without additional user input, .pgpass is always needed. One way or another, which ever way i try and twist this, something has to give on security. Perhaps it would be just about ok-ish if I could restrict the linux user to just creating databases, but the privilege to add a database means the privilege to drop them too. And ok-ish isn't great either. So, rather than fight this I think perhaps instead another approach - to pre-prepare sets of databases ahead of time and then, rather than create them programmatically, just assign them programmatically instead. It doesn't exactly solve the original problem, but I think i prefer it from a security standpoint anyhow. Ben On 3 Mar 2010, at 09:17, Richard Huxton wrote: On 02/03/10 18:22, Ben Eliott wrote: I have two roles, 'adminuser' with createdb permission, and 'dbuser' a user with CRUD privileges. adminuser is a member of the dbuser role, this seems to allow adminuser to createdb databases for dbuser with: createdb -U adminuser -O dbuser new_database_name Adding .pgpass to the linux user's home directory allows createdb to work without additional user input. But now it seems the linux user also has dropdb privileges. How can i restrict this? Perhaps there is a recommended method to disable dropdb? Can anyone suggest? From the SQL reference page for "GRANT" "The right to drop an object, or to alter its definition in any way, is not treated as a grantable privilege; it is inherent in the owner, and cannot be granted or revoked. (However, a similar effect can be obtained by granting or revoking membership in the role that owns the object; see below.) The owner implicitly has all grant options for the object, too." Don't make "dbuser" the owner of the database, make "adminuser" the owner, then grant whatever top-level privileges dbuser needs. Make sure you don't have adminuser as an automatic login through .pgpass The adminuser has no login privileges so by removing dropdb this should remove the possibility for any hacker chaos other than creating more databases? Or deleting/modifying all your data, presumably. If you don't trust the linux user account, don't give it automatic login. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] How to grant a user read-only access to a database?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > On 2 March 2010 14:49, Antonio Goméz Soto > wrote: > > Op 02-03-10 13:00, Thom Brown schreef: > >> > >> On 2 March 2010 11:46, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Thom Brown > wrote: > > On 2 March 2010 11:12, Antonio Goméz Soto< > antonio.gomez.s...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I tried this: > > > > names=# grant select on database names to spice; > > ERROR: invalid privilege type SELECT for database > > > > The documentation seems to imply I need to grant SELECT > > to each table separately. That's a lot of work, and what if > > new tables are created? > > > > Thanks, > > Antonio > > > > -- > > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > > To make changes to your subscription: > > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > > > > The privileges you can grant on a database are only related to the > creation of tables and connecting to that database. > > You could create a role which has SELECT-only access, apply that role > to all your tables, and assign users (other roles) as members of that > role. > > Regards > > Thom > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > >>> > >>> How to create that ? I'm also interested in this as I need this for > >>> backing > >>> up my databases. > >>> > >>> -- > >> > >> Okay, here's an example: > >> > >> CREATE ROLE readonly; -- This user won't be able to do anything by > >> default, not even log in > >> > >> GRANT SELECT on table_a TO readonly; > >> GRANT SELECT on table_b TO readonly; > >> GRANT SELECT on table_c TO readonly; > >> > >> CREATE ROLE testuser WITH LOGIN; -- At this point we haven't assigned > >> this user to any group > >> > >> SET ROLE testuser; > >> SELECT * FROM table_a; > >> > >> We get: > >> ERROR: permission denied for relation table_a > >> > >> SET ROLE postgres; > >> > >> DROP ROLE testuser; > >> CREATE ROLE testuser WITH LOGIN IN ROLE readonly; > >> > >> SET ROLE testuser; > >> SELECT * FROM table_a; > >> > >> This would then return the results from table_a > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Thom > > > > But I still need to define access to each table separately? > > > > Thanks, > > Antonio. > > > > As far as I'm aware. It's only in the upcoming version 9.0 that you > can do things like: > > GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO readonly; > > Other folk on here may have some alternative suggestions though. > > Thom > Eagerly waiting for 9.0 -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site & Server Administrator www.itech7.com
Re: [GENERAL] FSM and VM file
Thank you all for the suggestions. I did a vacuum and the size has gone down
drastically. But still it is not the same size as my master. I am looking
into it
Appreicate your help
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> On 02/03/10 21:47, akp geek wrote:
>
>> I am doing a replication of one of the database and the size of the slave
>> database is growing exponentially . Right now the size of master db is
>> 849M
>> and the slave is 7GB.
>>
>
> my master is 8.3 and slave is 8.4
>>
>
> I'm guessing your slave isn't being vacuumed. Or, perhaps you have a
> long-running transaction on the slave that is preventing dead rows from
> being cleaned up.
>
> Two useful commands:
>
> vacuum verbose mytable;
>
> This will show you how many rows/pages can/should be cleaned up.
>
> SELECT pg_size_pretty( pg_total_relation_size('mytable') );
>
> This will show you the size of "mytable" (formatted nicely).
>
> --
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
>
Re: [GENERAL] FSM and VM file
On 03/03/10 13:32, akp geek wrote: Thank you all for the suggestions. I did a vacuum and the size has gone down drastically. But still it is not the same size as my master. I am looking into it Check your autovacuum settings and you should be able to keep things stable at least. You might need to cluster tables / restart the replication to get the best case. Vacuuming needs to be a continual process. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] stopping processes, preventing connections
Hi. I'm continuing on with the problems I have in our reports/data warehouse system. Basically, the system brings in tables from our various production systems (sybase, postgresql, mssql, different servers) every night. Some tables are brought in whole, and some are brought in based on a date field, and only the relevant interval is imported. For tables which are brought whole, I first truncate the local table, then copy in the up-to-date data. For the ones that are brought partially, I delete partially first, and then copy in the same way. The trouble is that sometimes there is a stray select which has been initiated and then abandoned (without cancellation) by the crystal reports system. When these queries happen to last into the night, they lock some of the tables which are supposed to be truncated. Then the whole process hangs until the query quits or dies, which, we have seen in the past, can take several hours sometimes. What I want to do is write a script that kills any queries or connections from the crystal system, and then prevents new queries from being ran, until I finish loading all the tables, at which point I want to allow queries again. First, the easy part - regarding allowing/disallowing queries. Is it possible to GRANT or REVOKE access to tables based on the originating IP? Second, and the more complicated one - what do I do about rogue queries that are running when my process starts? Today we had a query that ran since yesterday. I called pg_cancel_backend() on it several times and waited for almost two hours - to no avail. Eventually I had to ask our sysadmin to shutdown PostgreSQL, which took some five minutes, but eventually worked. Is there a way to do the same thing to a single process without shutting down the whole server, and without causing any harm to the database or memory corruption? Something I can call from within SQL? I run the nightly script from a linux user which is not "postgres", so I'd prefer a way that doesn't require using "kill". Thank you, Herouth Maoz
Re: [GENERAL] FSM and VM file
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:32 -0500, akp geek wrote: > Thank you all for the suggestions. I did a vacuum and the size has > gone down drastically. But still it is not the same size as my master. > I am looking into it Plain vacuum does not file system size of relations. It just marks dead spaces are writable. If you haven't vacuumed for a long time, it probably means that you have lots of space to be reused. -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [GENERAL] How to grant a user read-only access to a database?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > As far as I'm aware. It's only in the upcoming version 9.0 that you > can do things like: > > GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO readonly; > > Other folk on here may have some alternative suggestions though. 9.0 will also have the hot standby feature. setting up a standby is pretty much always a good idea and access to the standby is automatically read only. this would be a cheap way to get what you want without dealing with privileges which is nice. you are also relatively insulated from problematic queries the user might make like accidental unconstrained joins, full table sorts etc.. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] FSM and VM file
I just made changes to postgresql.conf to make sure the autovacuum is turned on and I will update you.. Again thanks for your time Regards 2010/3/3 Devrim GÜNDÜZ > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:32 -0500, akp geek wrote: > > Thank you all for the suggestions. I did a vacuum and the size has > > gone down drastically. But still it is not the same size as my master. > > I am looking into it > > Plain vacuum does not file system size of relations. It just marks dead > spaces are writable. If you haven't vacuumed for a long time, it > probably means that you have lots of space to be reused. > -- > Devrim GÜNDÜZ > PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer > devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr > http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz >
[GENERAL] finding duplicate numbers in a select distinct statement
Hello all, I am trying to do the following query but I would like to know how many rows were deduplicated in the process: psql -d foo -c 'SELECT DISTINCT ON (error) error,ev_text FROM clients_event_log' -o fullfoo For example, I would want the output to be the following where count is the number of error rows that were deduplicated. count| error| ev_text 55 | 525152 | Some text 72 | 125124 | Some other text I imagine it's using the count function somewhere, just not sure how to embed that. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] How to grant a user read-only access to a database?
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 07:29:21 am Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > > As far as I'm aware. It's only in the upcoming version 9.0 that you > > can do things like: > > > > GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO readonly; > > > > Other folk on here may have some alternative suggestions though. > > 9.0 will also have the hot standby feature. setting up a standby is > pretty much always a good idea and access to the standby is > automatically read only. this would be a cheap way to get what you > want without dealing with privileges which is nice. you are also > relatively insulated from problematic queries the user might make like > accidental unconstrained joins, full table sorts etc.. > > merlin I believe all you have to do is this to create a read only user: create user ro_user with password 'passwd'; alter user ro_user set default_transaction_read_only = true; -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] finding duplicate numbers in a select distinct statement
select count(*) AS count, error, ev_text FROM clients_event_log GROUP BY error, ev_text; you can add 'HAVING count(*) > X'; , if you want to see only those with count above X, etc. -- GJ
Re: [GENERAL] finding duplicate numbers in a select distinct statement
2010/3/3 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz : > select count(*) AS count, error, ev_text FROM clients_event_log GROUP BY > error, ev_text; > > you can add 'HAVING count(*) > X'; , if you want to see only those with > count above X, etc. > > > -- > GJ > I was just about to reply to the group. Would this work too? psql -d foo -c 'SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(error)) AS count,error,ev_text FROM dsclient_logs WHERE ev_id > 23572151 GROUP BY error,ev_text' -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] finding duplicate numbers in a select distinct statement
just try if it does what you want it to do ;)
[GENERAL] bug in function arguments "recognition"
I've a function defined as: create or replace function catalog_relateditems(__itemid bigint, families int[]... I call it with select * from catalog_relateditems(6538::bigint, ARRAY[1,2,3,4,5]); and I get: HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts. The I try to drop the function using psql autocomplete and I get... DROP FUNCTION catalog_relateditems ( bigint, integer[], character varying) \df *rela* reports: public | catalog_relateditems | setof record | __itemid bigint, families integer[], OUT ... There is no other function named catalog_relateditems I'm on 8.3.9 debian lenny -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] LDAP Login Problem
Hi, I am having a problem with authentication using LDAP on PostgreSQL 8.4.2. The problem seems to be limited to which attribute is specified in the ldapprefix. If I specify "uid=" and then try login using the username "trobst" (which is the value in the ldap db) I get an error: hostall all 192.168.1.0/24ldap ldapserver=ldap.thermocable.com ldapprefix="uid=" ldapsuffix=",cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" LOG: LDAP login failed for user "uid=trobst,cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" on server "ldap.thermocable.com": error code 49 FATAL: LDAP authentication failed for user "trobst" However if I specify the ldapprefix to be "cn=" and login using the username "Tom Robst" it all works fine. hostall all 192.168.1.0/24ldap ldapserver=ldap.thermocable.com ldapprefix="cn=" ldapsuffix=",cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" Any help would be appreciated. Kind Regards, Tom Robst -- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] How to grant a user read-only access to a database?
On 3 March 2010 14:51, Kevin Kempter wrote: > On Wednesday 03 March 2010 07:29:21 am Merlin Moncure wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Thom Brown wrote: >> > As far as I'm aware. It's only in the upcoming version 9.0 that you >> > can do things like: >> > >> > GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO readonly; >> > >> > Other folk on here may have some alternative suggestions though. >> >> 9.0 will also have the hot standby feature. setting up a standby is >> pretty much always a good idea and access to the standby is >> automatically read only. this would be a cheap way to get what you >> want without dealing with privileges which is nice. you are also >> relatively insulated from problematic queries the user might make like >> accidental unconstrained joins, full table sorts etc.. >> >> merlin > > > I believe all you have to do is this to create a read only user: > > create user ro_user with password 'passwd'; > > alter user ro_user set default_transaction_read_only = true; > I believe that will only affect the *default* setting of the transaction. The user could still run the following before a query to write again: SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS TRANSACTION READ WRITE Thom -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] LDAP Login Problem
2010/3/3 Tom Robst : > Hi, > > I am having a problem with authentication using LDAP on PostgreSQL 8.4.2. > > The problem seems to be limited to which attribute is specified in the > ldapprefix. If I specify "uid=" and then try login using the username > "trobst" (which is the value in the ldap db) I get an error: > > host all all 192.168.1.0/24 ldap > ldapserver=ldap.thermocable.com ldapprefix="uid=" > ldapsuffix=",cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" > > LOG: LDAP login failed for user > "uid=trobst,cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" on server > "ldap.thermocable.com": error code 49 > FATAL: LDAP authentication failed for user "trobst" > > However if I specify the ldapprefix to be "cn=" and login using the username > "Tom Robst" it all works fine. > > host all all 192.168.1.0/24 ldap > ldapserver=ldap.thermocable.com ldapprefix="cn=" > ldapsuffix=",cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" The LDAP authentication needs to bind with the full DN, which is "cn=...". Specifying uid= doesn't make it a valid LDAP distinguished name. So unless your LDAP server is "tricky" (like the Microsoft one, which accepts both DN and "DOMAIN\username" in the login packet), there's nothing you can do I think. (well, you can also change all your DNs in the LDAP catalog, but that's likely to break a lot of other things) PostgreSQL 9.0 will allow you do do a search+bind to get the functionality you want. The change should be fairly standalone so you could probably have it backpatched if it's urgent for you, but since it's a new feature it's not something the community backpatches. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] How to grant a user read-only access to a database?
Kevin Kempter writes: > I believe all you have to do is this to create a read only user: > create user ro_user with password 'passwd'; > alter user ro_user set default_transaction_read_only = true; You do realize the user can just unset that again? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] bug in function arguments "recognition"
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo writes: > I've a function defined as: > create or replace function catalog_relateditems(__itemid bigint, > families int[]... If you want any useful comments, you're going to have to show a complete example, rather than selectively editing out what you think is irrelevant (and, no doubt, isn't). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] LDAP Login Problem
Thanks Magnus. I should have mentioned I'm using OpenLDAP 2.2. I guess I'll just have to wait for Postgres 9 and workaround it in the meantime. It's not an insurmountable issue... Regards, Tom Robst -- On 03/03/10 15:18, Magnus Hagander wrote: 2010/3/3 Tom Robst: Hi, I am having a problem with authentication using LDAP on PostgreSQL 8.4.2. The problem seems to be limited to which attribute is specified in the ldapprefix. If I specify "uid=" and then try login using the username "trobst" (which is the value in the ldap db) I get an error: hostall all 192.168.1.0/24ldap ldapserver=ldap.thermocable.com ldapprefix="uid=" ldapsuffix=",cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" LOG: LDAP login failed for user "uid=trobst,cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" on server "ldap.thermocable.com": error code 49 FATAL: LDAP authentication failed for user "trobst" However if I specify the ldapprefix to be "cn=" and login using the username "Tom Robst" it all works fine. hostall all 192.168.1.0/24ldap ldapserver=ldap.thermocable.com ldapprefix="cn=" ldapsuffix=",cn=Staff,dc=thermocable,dc=com" The LDAP authentication needs to bind with the full DN, which is "cn=...". Specifying uid= doesn't make it a valid LDAP distinguished name. So unless your LDAP server is "tricky" (like the Microsoft one, which accepts both DN and "DOMAIN\username" in the login packet), there's nothing you can do I think. (well, you can also change all your DNs in the LDAP catalog, but that's likely to break a lot of other things) PostgreSQL 9.0 will allow you do do a search+bind to get the functionality you want. The change should be fairly standalone so you could probably have it backpatched if it's urgent for you, but since it's a new feature it's not something the community backpatches. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] bug in function arguments "recognition"
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:05:29 +0100 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > I've a function defined as: > > create or replace function catalog_relateditems(__itemid bigint, > families int[]... Forget about it... there was a typo (missed out) that mixed in/out parameters. Sorry for the noise. -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] bug in function arguments "recognition"
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:22:31 -0500 Tom Lane wrote: > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo writes: > > I've a function defined as: > > create or replace function catalog_relateditems(__itemid bigint, > > families int[]... > > If you want any useful comments, you're going to have to show a > complete example, rather than selectively editing out what you > think is irrelevant (and, no doubt, isn't). Golden rule... I thought that psql auto completion was a good enough proof something wasn't working and I was thinking if someone could give me a good advice to trim down the clutter to build up a simpler function that could misbehave. I was not aware that in and out parameters could be intermixed and I was expecting an error, but pg was pretty happy with the syntax and this was enough to put me astray. Sorry -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] disable triggers isolated to transaction only?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > My question is this: will ALTER TABLE ONLY $subtable DISABLE TRIGGER > ALL within a transaction only affect my transaction, or will it affect > anyone inserting into this subtable. If it blocks external inserts > that's ok since my transactions are small while moving the data. I > guess at worse I lock the table. ALTER TABLE will lock and block, but I'd be remiss if I didn't point out the use of session_replication_role as a much better solution to this particular class of problem. (Even if your version does not support it, Vick, it should be noted here for the archives). The session_replication_role was added in 8.3: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/sql-altertable.html - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201003031020 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEAREDAAYFAkuOhDYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiPxwCg1JGjrfxvv0gmJDJPGCd2pLdE X0sAn3t+IYPnAIPcZqqxtBIaUUbkm1jL =US8W -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] disable triggers isolated to transaction only?
On 03/03/10 15:46, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: ALTER TABLE will lock and block, but I'd be remiss if I didn't point out the use of session_replication_role as a much better solution to this particular class of problem. (Even if your version does not support it, Vick, it should be noted here for the archives). The session_replication_role was added in 8.3: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/sql-altertable.html That wouldn't have occurred to me. Definitely worth adding to the archives. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] Massive table bloat
Hi! I've set up some system to track slow page executions in one of our (as yet not live) web apps. The tracking itself is handled completely within the database using a function. Within a very short time (approx. 1 week) and although we haven't got that much traffic on our testpages, the table in question as grown beyond a size of 23 GB, even though a SELECT count(*) on it will tell me that it only contains 235 rows. I'm sure I must be missing something obvious here... Here's the DDL for the table: CREATE TABLE stats.slowpages ( url text NOT NULL, lastexecduration integer NOT NULL, avgslowexecduration integer, execcount integer, lastexectime timestamp without time zone, site_id integer NOT NULL, slowestexecduration integer, totaltimespent bigint, CONSTRAINT "slowpages_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (url) )WITHOUT OIDS; -- Indexes CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_duration ON stats.slowpages USING btree (lastexecduration); CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_avgduration ON stats.slowpages USING btree (avgslowexecduration); CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_execcount ON stats.slowpages USING btree (execcount); CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_lastexec ON stats.slowpages USING btree (lastexectime); CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_site ON stats.slowpages USING btree (site_id); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX uidx_slowpages_url_site ON stats.slowpages USING btree (url, site_id); CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_totaltimespent ON stats.slowpages USING btree (totaltimespent); And this here is the function we use to insert or update entries in this table: CREATE or REPLACE FUNCTION "stats"."iou_slowpages"( IN "_site_id" integer, IN "_url" text, IN "_duration" integer) RETURNS void AS $BODY$ BEGIN LOOP UPDATE stats.slowpages SET avgslowexecduration = ((avgslowexecduration*execcount)+_duration)/(execcount+1) ,execcount = execcount+1 ,lastexectime = now() ,lastexecduration = _duration ,totaltimespent = totaltimespent + _duration ,slowestexecduration = CASE WHEN _duration > slowestexecduration THEN _duration ELSE slowestexecduration END WHERE url = _url AND site_id = _site_id; IF found THEN RETURN; END IF; BEGIN INSERT INTO stats.slowpages(url,lastexecduration,avgslowexecduration,slowestexecdura tion,totaltimespent,execcount,lastexectime,site_id) VALUES (_url, _duration, _duration,_duration,_duration, 1, now(), _site_id); RETURN; EXCEPTION WHEN unique_violation THEN END; END LOOP; END; $BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE; _site_id is a small integer value, _url is a full URL string to a page and _duration is a value in milliseconds. We're on PostgreSQL 8.3.7. Any idea about what I may be missing here? Kind regards Markus Computec Media AG Sitz der Gesellschaft und Registergericht: Furth (HRB 8818) Vorstandsmitglieder: Albrecht Hengstenberg (Vorsitzender) und Rainer Rosenbusch Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Jurg Marquard Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer: DE 812 575 276 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Massive table bloat
On 3 March 2010 15:33, Markus Wollny wrote: > Hi! > > I've set up some system to track slow page executions in one of our (as > yet not live) web apps. The tracking itself is handled completely within > the database using a function. Within a very short time (approx. 1 week) > and although we haven't got that much traffic on our testpages, the > table in question as grown beyond a size of 23 GB, even though a SELECT > count(*) on it will tell me that it only contains 235 rows. I'm sure I > must be missing something obvious here... > > Here's the DDL for the table: > > CREATE TABLE stats.slowpages > ( > url text NOT NULL, > lastexecduration integer NOT NULL, > avgslowexecduration integer, > execcount integer, > lastexectime timestamp without time zone, > site_id integer NOT NULL, > slowestexecduration integer, > totaltimespent bigint, > CONSTRAINT "slowpages_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (url) > )WITHOUT OIDS; > > -- Indexes > CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_duration ON stats.slowpages USING btree > (lastexecduration); > CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_avgduration ON stats.slowpages USING btree > (avgslowexecduration); > CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_execcount ON stats.slowpages USING btree > (execcount); > CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_lastexec ON stats.slowpages USING btree > (lastexectime); > CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_site ON stats.slowpages USING btree > (site_id); > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX uidx_slowpages_url_site ON stats.slowpages USING > btree (url, site_id); > CREATE INDEX idx_slowpages_totaltimespent ON stats.slowpages USING btree > (totaltimespent); > > And this here is the function we use to insert or update entries in this > table: > > CREATE or REPLACE FUNCTION "stats"."iou_slowpages"( > IN "_site_id" integer, > IN "_url" text, > IN "_duration" integer) > RETURNS void AS > $BODY$ > BEGIN > LOOP > > UPDATE stats.slowpages > SET avgslowexecduration = > ((avgslowexecduration*execcount)+_duration)/(execcount+1) > , execcount = execcount+1 > , lastexectime = now() > , lastexecduration = _duration > , totaltimespent = totaltimespent + _duration > , slowestexecduration = CASE WHEN _duration > > slowestexecduration > THEN _duration ELSE slowestexecduration END > WHERE url = _url AND site_id = _site_id; > IF found THEN > RETURN; > END IF; > > BEGIN > INSERT INTO > stats.slowpages(url,lastexecduration,avgslowexecduration,slowestexecdura > tion,totaltimespent,execcount,lastexectime,site_id) > VALUES (_url, _duration, _duration,_duration,_duration, 1, > now(), _site_id); > RETURN; > EXCEPTION WHEN unique_violation THEN > > END; > END LOOP; > END; > $BODY$ > LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE; > > _site_id is a small integer value, _url is a full URL string to a page > and _duration is a value in milliseconds. We're on PostgreSQL 8.3.7. > > Any idea about what I may be missing here? > > Kind regards > > Markus > If you update rows, it actually creates a new version of it. The old one doesn't get removed until the VACUUM process cleans it up, so maybe you need to run that against the database? Regards Thom -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Massive table bloat
do a vacuum analyze verbose on it, and see if it complains about FSM (free space map) setting. Which it probably will be.
Re: [GENERAL] stopping processes, preventing connections
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Herouth Maoz wrote: > > > First, the easy part - regarding allowing/disallowing queries. Is it > possible to GRANT or REVOKE access to tables based on the originating IP? > I'd suggest separating out access to your tables by roles, and then restricting those roles to certain IP ranges in pg_hba.conf. > Second, and the more complicated one - what do I do about rogue queries > that are running when my process starts? Today we had a query that ran since > yesterday. I called pg_cancel_backend() on it several times and waited for > almost two hours - to no avail. Eventually I had to ask our sysadmin to > shutdown PostgreSQL, which took some five minutes, but eventually worked. Is > there a way to do the same thing to a single process without shutting down > the whole server, and without causing any harm to the database or memory > corruption? Something I can call from within SQL? I run the nightly script > from a linux user which is not "postgres", so I'd prefer a way that doesn't > require using "kill". > > On 8.4, you can use pg_terminate_backend(), which sends a SIGTERM instead of pg_cancel_backend's SIGINT. If you're not on 8.4, you can just do this manually with a "kill -SIGTERM backend_pid". If that doesn't work either, you might have to resort to a "kill -SIGKILL backend_pid". Killing a single backend should be much better for you than restarting Postgres entirely. These operations shouldn't result in database corruption. You have to be database superuser to use pg_cancel_backend() or pg_terminate_backend(), or have a shell login as the database user to use "kill". No way around that for now. Though next time you see a query which doesn't respond to pg_cancel_backend(), try gathering information about the query and what the backend is doing; either you're doing something unusual (e.g. an app is restarting the query automatically after getting canceled) or perhaps you've stumbled on a bug in Postgres. Josh
Re: [GENERAL] stopping processes, preventing connections
On Mar 3, 2010, at 18:01 , Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Herouth Maoz wrote: > > First, the easy part - regarding allowing/disallowing queries. Is it possible > to GRANT or REVOKE access to tables based on the originating IP? > > I'd suggest separating out access to your tables by roles, and then > restricting those roles to certain IP ranges in pg_hba.conf. Thank you. I guess I will go for something simple - I'll give the lady in charge of the reports machine a new user/password to use, and revoke that user's access. I was hoping to avoid her needing to change settings in Windows, but it seems to be the easiest way. > > Second, and the more complicated one - what do I do about rogue queries that > are running when my process starts? Today we had a query that ran since > yesterday. I called pg_cancel_backend() on it several times and waited for > almost two hours - to no avail. Eventually I had to ask our sysadmin to > shutdown PostgreSQL, which took some five minutes, but eventually worked. Is > there a way to do the same thing to a single process without shutting down > the whole server, and without causing any harm to the database or memory > corruption? Something I can call from within SQL? I run the nightly script > from a linux user which is not "postgres", so I'd prefer a way that doesn't > require using "kill". > > > On 8.4, you can use pg_terminate_backend(), which sends a SIGTERM instead of > pg_cancel_backend's SIGINT. If you're not on 8.4, you can just do this > manually with a "kill -SIGTERM backend_pid". If that doesn't work either, you > might have to resort to a "kill -SIGKILL backend_pid". Killing a single > backend should be much better for you than restarting Postgres entirely. > These operations shouldn't result in database corruption. > > You have to be database superuser to use pg_cancel_backend() or > pg_terminate_backend(), or have a shell login as the database user to use > "kill". No way around that for now. Unfortunately, we only have 8.3 - is SIGTERM safe on 8.3? I guess I'll have to sudo or use local ssh. > > Though next time you see a query which doesn't respond to > pg_cancel_backend(), try gathering information about the query and what the > backend is doing; either you're doing something unusual (e.g. an app is > restarting the query automatically after getting canceled) or perhaps you've > stumbled on a bug in Postgres. I'd appreciate it if you tell me what to look for. It was running a join on several tables, but nothing too complicated. It may be that the query is not optimized (one of the tables is not indexed properly) but it still should respond to cancel - shouldn't it? Thank you very much, Herouth
[GENERAL] Raid 10 settings for optimal postgres performance?
I have just configured our disks to raid10 from raid5. The raid 10 is now 6 drives giving us 750G use by OS and postgres. What is the preferred setup for postgres concerning cache settings on the controller and disks and the preferred block size allocated for the disks when postgres uses block size 8192? df -h /dev/sda3 750G 65G 647G 10% / /dev/sda1 496M 17M 454M 4% /boot show all; server_version| 8.4.2 block_size| 8192 Controller settings Read-cache mode - Enabled Write-cache mode - Enabled (write-back) Write-cache setting - Enabled (write-back) when protected by battery Stripe-unit size : 256 KB Disk setting Write Cache: Disabled (write-through) Postgresql.conf fsync = on # turns forced synchronization on or off #synchronous_commit = on# immediate fsync at commit wal_sync_method = fsync # the default is the first option Logical drive number 1 Logical drive name : RAID10 RAID level : 10 Status of logical drive : Okay Size : 858000 MB Read-cache mode : Enabled Write-cache mode : Enabled (write-back) Write-cache setting : Enabled (write-back) when protected by battery Partitioned : Yes Number of segments : 6 Stripe-unit size : 256 KB Stripe order (Channel,Device): 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 Defunct segments : No Defunct stripes : No Device #0 Device is a Hard drive State : Online Supported : Yes Transfer Speed : SAS 3.0 Gb/s Reported Channel,Device: 0,0 Vendor : IBM-ESXS Model : ST3300655SS Firmware : BA26 World-wide name: 5000C5000A42EFAC Size : 286102 MB Write Cache: Disabled (write-through) FRU: None PFA Sincerely, Chris _ Take your contacts everywhere http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9712959
[GENERAL] Work Mem Allocation Questions
1: Is the default work_mem pre-allocated to the Postgres processes - or does it get allocated when needed? Say I have work_mem at 30MB - will Postgres allocate that 30MB on connection, or only when it needed by a query? 2: If work_mem is, say, 30MB, and my query needs 10MB - will Postgres allocate all 30MB, or just the 10MB I need? -- Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106 Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] finding duplicate numbers in a select distinct statement
2010/3/3 Terry : > 2010/3/3 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz : >> select count(*) AS count, error, ev_text FROM clients_event_log GROUP BY >> error, ev_text; >> >> you can add 'HAVING count(*) > X'; , if you want to see only those with >> count above X, etc. >> >> >> -- >> GJ >> > > I was just about to reply to the group. Would this work too? > psql -d foo -c 'SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(error)) AS count,error,ev_text > FROM dsclient_logs WHERE ev_id > 23572151 GROUP BY error,ev_text' > My statement was broke. GJ's was spot on. Thanks! -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Work Mem Allocation Questions
In response to Brad Nicholson : > 1: Is the default work_mem pre-allocated to the Postgres processes - or > does it get allocated when needed? Say I have work_mem at 30MB - will > Postgres allocate that 30MB on connection, or only when it needed by a > query? It's allocated on demand and freed when no longer needed. > 2: If work_mem is, say, 30MB, and my query needs 10MB - will Postgres > allocate all 30MB, or just the 10MB I need? Same answer. Keep in mind that work_mem is not an upper cap, it is a per-sort limit. Thus a query with 5 sorts could allocate 5 * work_mem. The docs have a little more detail on this. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] How to grant a user read-only access to a database?
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 08:19:46 am Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Kempter writes: > > I believe all you have to do is this to create a read only user: > > create user ro_user with password 'passwd'; > > alter user ro_user set default_transaction_read_only = true; > > You do realize the user can just unset that again? > > regards, tom lane I did not. Thanks for the heads up. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] Auto VACUUM
Hi All - I need some help from you. this question is in follow up with my earlier questions. I turned the autovacuum and restarted the db and the settings I have as follows. It seems the autovacuum process has not been turned on. It's almost more than 3 hours I have restarted my DB with following setting. I have ps -ef to see the proces list. Is there some thing I am doing wrong. Can you please help? Regards # - Query/Index Statistics Collector - #track_activities = on track_counts = on #track_functions = none # none, pl, all #track_activity_query_size = 1024 #update_process_title = on #stats_temp_directory = 'pg_stat_tmp' #-- # AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS #-- autovacuum = on # Enable autovacuum subprocess? 'on' # requires track_counts to also be on. #log_autovacuum_min_duration = -1 # -1 disables, 0 logs all actions and # their durations, > 0 logs only # actions running at least this number # of milliseconds. autovacuum_max_workers = 10 # max number of autovacuum subprocesses autovacuum_naptime = 180min # time between autovacuum runs #autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates before # vacuum #autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates before # analyze #autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2 # fraction of table size before vacuum #autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1 # fraction of table size before analyze #autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 2 # maximum XID age before forced vacuum # (change requires restart) #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms# default vacuum cost delay for # autovacuum, in milliseconds; # -1 means use vacuum_cost_delay #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1 # default vacuum cost limit for # autovacuum, -1 means use # vacuum_cost_limit
Re: [GENERAL] Massive table bloat
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Thom Brown [mailto:thombr...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2010 16:56 > An: Markus Wollny > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Massive table bloat > If you update rows, it actually creates a new version of it. > The old one doesn't get removed until the VACUUM process > cleans it up, so maybe you need to run that against the database? I already do on a nightly basis (which is probably not often enough in this case) and have got autovacuum running. I'll check into FSM settings as suggested by Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, there's probably half a solution to the problem there, the other half being probably the autovacuum daemon not visiting this table nearly often enough. Kind regards Markus Computec Media AG Sitz der Gesellschaft und Registergericht: Fürth (HRB 8818) Vorstandsmitglieder: Albrecht Hengstenberg (Vorsitzender) und Rainer Rosenbusch Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Jürg Marquard Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer: DE 812 575 276 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Auto VACUUM
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:46 -0500, akp geek wrote: > Hi All - > > I need some help from you. this question is in follow up > with my earlier questions. I turned the autovacuum and restarted the > db and the settings I have as follows. It seems the autovacuum process > has not been turned on. It's almost more than 3 hours I have restarted > my DB with following setting. I have ps -ef to see the proces list. > Is there some thing I am doing wrong. > > Can you please help? I'dd suggest leaving the "naptime" in the default (60 seconds) Your value is very high... too high... I'dd say Use values around 60 seconds (never minutes)... > > Regards > > # - Query/Index Statistics Collector - > #track_activities = on > track_counts = on > #track_functions = none # none, pl, all > #track_activity_query_size = 1024 > #update_process_title = on > #stats_temp_directory = 'pg_stat_tmp' > > > #-- > # AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS > #-- > > autovacuum = on # Enable autovacuum subprocess? 'on' > # requires track_counts to > also be on. > #log_autovacuum_min_duration = -1 # -1 disables, 0 logs all > actions and > # their durations, > 0 logs > only > # actions running at least > this number > # of milliseconds. > autovacuum_max_workers = 10 # max number of autovacuum > subprocesses > autovacuum_naptime = 180min # time between autovacuum runs > #autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates > before > # vacuum > #autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates > before > # analyze > #autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2 # fraction of table size > before vacuum > #autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1 # fraction of table size > before analyze > #autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 2 # maximum XID age before > forced vacuum > # (change requires restart) > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms# default vacuum cost delay > for > # autovacuum, in milliseconds; > # -1 means use > vacuum_cost_delay > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1 # default vacuum cost limit > for > # autovacuum, -1 means use > # vacuum_cost_limit > > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Auto VACUUM
thank you . I changed the value to 1M and I started seeing the autovacuum being triggered. But I am getting the following message ERROR: canceling autovacuum task, is it because the table are getting updated and the vacuum process in place and vacuum happens at a later point of time Regards On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Joao Ferreira gmail < joao.miguel.c.ferre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:46 -0500, akp geek wrote: > > Hi All - > > > > I need some help from you. this question is in follow up > > with my earlier questions. I turned the autovacuum and restarted the > > db and the settings I have as follows. It seems the autovacuum process > > has not been turned on. It's almost more than 3 hours I have restarted > > my DB with following setting. I have ps -ef to see the proces list. > > Is there some thing I am doing wrong. > > > > Can you please help? > > I'dd suggest leaving the "naptime" in the default (60 seconds) > > Your value is very high... too high... I'dd say > > Use values around 60 seconds (never minutes)... > > > > > Regards > > > > # - Query/Index Statistics Collector - > > #track_activities = on > > track_counts = on > > #track_functions = none # none, pl, all > > #track_activity_query_size = 1024 > > #update_process_title = on > > #stats_temp_directory = 'pg_stat_tmp' > > > > > > > #-- > > # AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS > > > #-- > > > > autovacuum = on # Enable autovacuum subprocess? 'on' > > # requires track_counts to > > also be on. > > #log_autovacuum_min_duration = -1 # -1 disables, 0 logs all > > actions and > > # their durations, > 0 logs > > only > > # actions running at least > > this number > > # of milliseconds. > > autovacuum_max_workers = 10 # max number of autovacuum > > subprocesses > > autovacuum_naptime = 180min # time between autovacuum runs > > #autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates > > before > > # vacuum > > #autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates > > before > > # analyze > > #autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2 # fraction of table size > > before vacuum > > #autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1 # fraction of table size > > before analyze > > #autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 2 # maximum XID age before > > forced vacuum > > # (change requires restart) > > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms# default vacuum cost delay > > for > > # autovacuum, in milliseconds; > > # -1 means use > > vacuum_cost_delay > > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1 # default vacuum cost limit > > for > > # autovacuum, -1 means use > > # vacuum_cost_limit > > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >
[GENERAL] PQntuples returns an int.
Hello. I've been looking at the PQntuples function, in section 29.3.2. 'Retrieving query result information' of http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/libpq-exec.html The declaration is: int PQntuples(const PGresult *res); I'm wondering: why the 'int'? why not a 'long int', or an 'unsigned int', or whatever? I'm asking this because I'm wondering whether you could have more tuples in the result of a query than could be indexed by the 'int' type. May this happen? All the best, -- Guillaume Yziquel http://yziquel.homelinux.org/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] Larger volumes of chronologically ordered data and the planner
Hello, What is PostgreSQL's likely behaviour when it encounters a large volume of data that is chronologically ordered (there's a btree index on a date column)? Is postgreSQL intelligent enough to discern that since the most frequently accessed data is invariably recent data, that it should store only that in memory, and efficiently store less relevant, older data on disk (the volume of data in production at the moment is still small enough to fit entirely in memory)? The application I maintain is not really a data warehousing app, but this is likely to be where I first encounter performance issues, if I ever do. Where can I learn more about this subject in general? Regards, John Moran -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] stopping processes, preventing connections
> > >> Second, and the more complicated one - what do I do about rogue queries >> that are running when my process starts? Today we had a query that ran since >> yesterday. I called pg_cancel_backend() on it several times and waited for >> almost two hours - to no avail. Eventually I had to ask our sysadmin to >> shutdown PostgreSQL, which took some five minutes, but eventually worked. Is >> there a way to do the same thing to a single process without shutting down >> the whole server, and without causing any harm to the database or memory >> corruption? Something I can call from within SQL? I run the nightly script >> from a linux user which is not "postgres", so I'd prefer a way that doesn't >> require using "kill". >> >> > On 8.4, you can use pg_terminate_backend(), which sends a SIGTERM instead > of pg_cancel_backend's SIGINT. If you're not on 8.4, you can just do this > manually with a "kill -SIGTERM backend_pid". If that doesn't work either, > you might have to resort to a "kill -SIGKILL backend_pid". Killing a single > backend should be much better for you than restarting Postgres entirely. > These operations shouldn't result in database corruption. > > You have to be database superuser to use pg_cancel_backend() or > pg_terminate_backend(), or have a shell login as the database user to use > "kill". No way around that for now. > > > Unfortunately, we only have 8.3 - is SIGTERM safe on 8.3? > > I guess I'll have to sudo or use local ssh. > > Yeah, I think any of the kill modes on the backends should be "safe" in terms of your data. If you're interested in killing without having to SSH in, you could play with something like: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Backend_killer_function and adjust it as needed (permissions, etc) for your needs. > Though next time you see a query which doesn't respond to > pg_cancel_backend(), try gathering information about the query and what the > backend is doing; either you're doing something unusual (e.g. an app is > restarting the query automatically after getting canceled) or perhaps you've > stumbled on a bug in Postgres. > > > I'd appreciate it if you tell me what to look for. It was running a join on > several tables, but nothing too complicated. It may be that the query is not > optimized (one of the tables is not indexed properly) but it still should > respond to cancel - shouldn't it? > > I came across an old thread discussing a problem which sounds similar to yours (process not dying with a pg_cancel_backend()): http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-10/msg01696.php there's some good info throughout that thread, including the recommendation from Tom Lane to try to reproduce, assuming your query isn't stuck inside a plpython or similar function. If you can reproduce your hung query which doesn't respond to a pg_cancel_backend(), try following instructions here (assuming your server is a Linux/BSD machine) to gather more information about what's going on inside the backend: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Linux/BSD strace, top, and/or vmstat information might also be useful. Hope this helps, Josh
Re: [GENERAL] Larger volumes of chronologically ordered data and the planner
John Moran writes: > What is PostgreSQL's likely behaviour when it encounters a large > volume of data that is chronologically ordered (there's a btree index > on a date column)? Is postgreSQL intelligent enough to discern that > since the most frequently accessed data is invariably recent data, > that it should store only that in memory, and efficiently store less > relevant, older data on disk (the volume of data in production at the > moment is still small enough to fit entirely in memory)? There's no dedicated intelligence about such a case, but I don't see why the ordinary cache management algorithms won't handle it perfectly well. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] PQntuples returns an int.
On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote: > Hello. > > I've been looking at the PQntuples function, in section 29.3.2. 'Retrieving > query result information' of > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/libpq-exec.html > > The declaration is: > >> int PQntuples(const PGresult *res); > > I'm wondering: why the 'int'? why not a 'long int', or an 'unsigned int', or > whatever? > > I'm asking this because I'm wondering whether you could have more tuples in > the result of a query than could be indexed by the 'int' type. May this > happen? That's returning the number of tuples you've already retrieved and have in memory on the client. I'm not sure what the overhead in storage is, but if you have more than two billion tuples in your result set you're probably going to blow out of memory long before you get there (and should be using a cursor instead). Cheers, Steve -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
I have several tables in a SQL Anywhere 10 database that I'm converting to PostgreSQL 8.4.2. In ASA we did not use any GUID columns but we are in Postgres. I have one table that is citystateinfo and the primary key is a UUID and it is automatically generated using the contrib module oosp-uuid. That works fine. We are also using the citext contrib module on most of our text columns so that we can do case insensitive searches. We now have this working properly. Here is a simple select that is used to get the UUID primary key for the citystateinfo table to put into a terminaladdress table. select "citystateinfoid" as KeyName from iss.citystateinfo where "cityname"='JACKSONVILLE' and "statecode"='FL' and "zipcode"='32226'. In PGAdmin this returns the correct uuid in the proper format. In the program that we're using to convert this data (a commerical product called DMC), when it is run on the tech support machine at the authors company, it returns the proper UUID to all columns where there is a matching row in the citystateinfo table. On my machine the UUID that is returned is 16 bytes and I cannot make out any relevant numbers from the UUID key in the citystateinfo table. I've tried this in a Windows XP machine and a Windows 7 64 bit. Now here is the weird thing. I did a complete backup of my database and had the author restore the data on his. It works every time there. He then did a pg_dumpall and I reloaded my db with his script and while his runs all of the queries fine, mine is still not returning the proper length UUID column. I'm using the UTF ODBC driver 8.4 and Postgres 8.4.2. Does anyone have any idea on what could possibly be going on? It's running find on computers located in other locations but doesn't work properly on either one of my machines. It seems to me that it must be enviornmental. The author has both Windows 2008 server and Windows 7 64 bit. Best Regards Michael Gould
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
On 3/3/2010 3:40 PM, Michael Gould wrote: > On my machine the UUID that is returned is 16 bytes and I cannot make > out any relevant numbers from the UUID key in the citystateinfo > table. I've tried this in a Windows XP machine and a Windows 7 64 bit. > > Now here is the weird thing. I did a complete backup of my database > and had the author restore the data on his. It works every time > there. He then did a pg_dumpall and I reloaded my db with his script > and while his runs all of the queries fine, mine is still not > returning the proper length UUID column. > > I'm using the UTF ODBC driver 8.4 and Postgres 8.4.2. > > You state the PgAdmin returns the correct result on your machine connecting to the database that returns the wrong result using Data Conversion App, RIGHT??? If so I'm betting it has to do with ODBC driver doing something odd or the DATA Conversion App is doing something ODD. What is the name of app being used to convert the data? Which ODBC are you using ? http://psqlodbc.projects.postgresql.org/ or http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng/ Note: PgAdmin does not use ODBC interface . All legitimate Magwerks Corporation quotations are sent in a .PDF file attachment with a unique ID number generated by our proprietary quotation system. Quotations received via any other form of communication will not be honored. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including attachments, may contain legally privileged, confidential or other information proprietary to Magwerks Corporation and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it addresses. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any unauthorized viewing, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and destroy all occurrences of this e-mail immediately. Thank you. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] PQntuples returns an int.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > I'm asking this because I'm wondering whether you could have more tuples > in the result of a query than could be indexed by the 'int' type. May > this happen? Yes, but it's a low concern as many other things would break before you got to that point. See: http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.general/browse_thread/thread/462c454345221267/f61926526b539036 or: http://5z8.info/super-nsfw_cyd - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201003031555 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEAREDAAYFAkuOz1cACgkQvJuQZxSWSsge+wCg0Wmo/YyEkymE7Y1FILtRoO3J CDQAn36Gs8Si37YdeheaM6v2JiU+EPOz =e+3U -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Raid 10 settings for optimal postgres performance?
Chris Barnes wrote: What is the preferred setup for postgres concerning cache settings on the controller and disks and the preferred block size allocated for the disks when postgres uses block size 8192? Controller settings Read-cache mode - Enabled Write-cache mode - Enabled (write-back) Write-cache setting - Enabled (write-back) when protected by battery Stripe-unit size : 256 KB Disk setting Write Cache: Disabled (write-through) You already have the right cache settings: write-back when protected by battery, write cache on disks disabled. And there aren't any interesting settings to change for block of stripe size on a RAID10 array that do anything you'll be able to measure. You're done with controller and disk setup. Looks like a standard ext3 filesystem under Linux, right? Next you should run tests with bonnie++ to make sure the array is performing as expecting. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support g...@2ndquadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
Re: [GENERAL] Larger volumes of chronologically ordered data and the planner
John Moran wrote: Is postgreSQL intelligent enough to discern that since the most frequently accessed data is invariably recent data, that it should store only that in memory, and efficiently store less relevant, older data on disk When you ask for a database block from disk, it increments a usage count figure for that block when it's read into memory, and again if it turns out it was already there. Those requests to allocate new blocks are constantly decreasing those usage counts as they "clock sweep" over the cache looking for space that hasn't been used recently. This will automatically keep blocks you've used recently in RAM, while evicting ones that aren't. The database doesn't have any intelligence to determining what data to keep in memory or not beyond that. Its sole notion of "relevant" is whether someone has accessed that block recently or not. The operating system cache will sit as a second layer on top of this, typically with its own LRU scheme typically for determining what gets cached or not. I've written a long paper covering the internals here named "Inside the PostgreSQL Buffer Cache" at http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/ if you want to know exactly how this is all implemented. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support g...@2ndquadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Auto VACUUM
What's the complete error message? Vacuum is using maintenance_work_mem. What is your setting maintenance_work_mem compared to your RAM size. Igor Neyman > -Original Message- > From: akp geek [mailto:akpg...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:10 PM > To: Joao Ferreira gmail > Cc: pgsql-general > Subject: Re: Auto VACUUM > > thank you . I changed the value to 1M and I started seeing > the autovacuum being triggered. But I am getting the > following message > > ERROR: canceling autovacuum task, is it because the table > are getting updated and the vacuum process in place and > vacuum happens at a later point of time > > Regards > > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Joao Ferreira gmail > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:46 -0500, akp geek wrote: > > Hi All - > > > > I need some help from you. this question is > in follow up > > with my earlier questions. I turned the autovacuum > and restarted the > > db and the settings I have as follows. It seems the > autovacuum process > > has not been turned on. It's almost more than 3 hours > I have restarted > > my DB with following setting. I have ps -ef to see > the proces list. > > Is there some thing I am doing wrong. > > > > Can you please help? > > > I'dd suggest leaving the "naptime" in the default (60 seconds) > > Your value is very high... too high... I'dd say > > Use values around 60 seconds (never minutes)... > > > > > > Regards > > > > # - Query/Index Statistics Collector - > > #track_activities = on > > track_counts = on > > #track_functions = none # none, pl, all > > #track_activity_query_size = 1024 > > #update_process_title = on > > #stats_temp_directory = 'pg_stat_tmp' > > > > > > > #- > - > > # AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS > > > #- > - > > > > autovacuum = on # Enable autovacuum > subprocess? 'on' > > # requires > track_counts to > > also be on. > > #log_autovacuum_min_duration = -1 # -1 > disables, 0 logs all > > actions and > > # their > durations, > 0 logs > > only > > # actions > running at least > > this number > > # of milliseconds. > > autovacuum_max_workers = 10 # max number > of autovacuum > > subprocesses > > autovacuum_naptime = 180min # time > between autovacuum runs > > #autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50 # min number > of row updates > > before > > # vacuum > > #autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 50 # min number > of row updates > > before > > # analyze > > #autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2 # fraction of > table size > > before vacuum > > #autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1 # fraction of > table size > > before analyze > > #autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 2 # maximum XID > age before > > forced vacuum > > # (change > requires restart) > > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms# default > vacuum cost delay > > for > > # autovacuum, > in milliseconds; > > # -1 means use > > vacuum_cost_delay > > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1 # default > vacuum cost limit > > for > > # autovacuum, > -1 means use > > # vacuum_cost_limit > > > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list > (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > > > > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Cacti + PostgreSQL Graphing
Greg (or anyone out there) ... have you had any experience with using check_postgres.pl --action=dbstats with Cacti? I'm getting, in my cacti.log, a result of: SPINE: Poller[0] Host[124] DS[2619] SCRIPT: /usr/local/bin/check_postgres.pl --action=dbstats --host=192.0.2.23 --dbuser=monitor --dbpass=monitor --dbname=test, output: U The specific problem bing the 'output: U', which should look something like: output: backends:1 commits:97645 rollbacks:5 read:177034 hit:6872718 idxscan:0 idxtupread:0 idxtupfetch:0 idxblksread:2199 idxblkshit:3 seqscan:3 seqtupread:1000110 ret:24845129 fetch:2956289 ins:2201738 upd:3999 del:312 dbname:test Google seems to have a bunch of stuff talking about 'output: U', but dating back to '06 and older ... the command runs fine (and fast) from the command line, so not a timeout ... So, anyone using dbstats with the newest version of Cacti, and have it working? On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Greg, before I start hacking away at it, do you have any examples of using check_postgres_dbstats with cacti? rather not recreate teh wheel is someone has already done it ... thx ... On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Greg Smith wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: We are mainly a nagios / cacti environment, and I came across... Why start with Cacti then? There's way more Nagios integration available; the little check_pgsql that comes with it (I think it's still there), and the whole list at http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Plugins/Databases/PostgresQL I'd think that starting with http://bucardo.org/wiki/Check_postgres for example would put you way ahead of anything that's available for Cacti. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support g...@2ndquadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
"Justin Graf" wrote: > On 3/3/2010 3:40 PM, Michael Gould wrote: >> On my machine the UUID that is returned is 16 bytes and I cannot make >> out any relevant numbers from the UUID key in the citystateinfo >> table. I've tried this in a Windows XP machine and a Windows 7 64 bit. >> >> Now here is the weird thing. I did a complete backup of my database >> and had the author restore the data on his. It works every time >> there. He then did a pg_dumpall and I reloaded my db with his script >> and while his runs all of the queries fine, mine is still not >> returning the proper length UUID column. >> >> I'm using the UTF ODBC driver 8.4 and Postgres 8.4.2. >> >> > You state the PgAdmin returns the correct result on your machine > connecting to the database that returns the wrong result using Data > Conversion App, RIGHT??? Any SQL client that can accept and process a query will bring it back correctly. Also the author of DMC's can run it on his local PostGres server restored using my backup from this afternoon and he gets the correct results through DMC. On my machine I get a UUID that looks like 8BA92F06-BCD6-49. Also I've noticed that when I bring up the ODBC administrator, I do not see any entry for the Postgres ODBC driver. I've tried to uninstall the driver, reboot and reinstall with the same results. Best Regards Mike Gould -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] The REAL cost of joins
Hello everyone, I have inadvertently set off a furball on an unrelated ng on what is the actual cost of SQL joins. But there's no reliable conclusion. I would like to actually know that, that is, are JOINs truly expensive? As they say, one measurement is worth a thousand opinions, so I've done measurement on my PG app: $ time echo "\c hrs; SELECT hosts.ip, reservation.start_date, architecture.architecture, os_kind.os_kind, os_rel.os_rel, os_version.os_version, project.project, email.email FROM hosts INNER JOIN project ON project.id = hosts.project_id INNER JOIN architecture ON hosts.architecture_id = architecture.id INNER JOIN os_kind ON os_kind.id = hosts.os_kind_id INNER JOIN os_rel ON hosts.os_rel_id = os_rel.id INNER JOIN os_version ON hosts.os_version_id = os_version.id INNER JOIN reservation_hosts ON hosts.id = reservation_hosts.host_id INNER JOIN reservation on reservation.id = reservation_hosts.reservation_id INNER JOIN email ON reservation.email_id = email.id ;" | psql > /dev/null real0m0.099s user0m0.015s sys 0m0.005s $ time echo "\c hrs; > SELECT hosts.ip FROM hosts; > SELECT reservation.start_date FROM reservation; > SELECT architecture.architecture FROM architecture; > SELECT os_rel.os_rel FROM os_rel; > SELECT os_version.os_version FROM os_version; > SELECT project.project FROM project; > SELECT email.email FROM email; > " | psql > /dev/null real0m0.046s user0m0.008s sys 0m0.004s Note: I've created indexes on those tables, both on data columns like hosts.ip and on .id columns. What do you think of this? And in general: when (if?) should one denormalize data? Regards, mk -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
One thing I've noticed is that on my machines, when I install the odbc driver I get no error messages but when I look in the ODBC administrator I do not see any entry for PostGres in the drivers list. I do know that it somehow is working because the DMC conversion tool only uses ODBC and builds it's data structures based on what it gets back from querying the database. Programs like WinSQL also work and I believe it uses ODBC. In the past I believe I remember seeing the Postgres driver listed in the ODBC admin tool under the drivers tab. I'm running on a Windows 7 64 bit machine and I'm logged into our domain as the domain administrator. Is there something else I need to do to install the odbc driver under windows? I've even turned UAC off and it didn't seem to help Best Regards -- Michael Gould, Managing Partner Intermodal Software Solutions, LLC 904.226.0978 904.592.5250 fax -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Cacti + PostgreSQL Graphing
Found it ... spine (the new poller for cacti) doesnt' seem to report errors very well ... switched to cmd.php and it turns out that, low and behold, it can't find psql since /usr/local/bin isn't part of the path ... fixed that in check_postgres.pl and all works well now ... On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Greg (or anyone out there) ... have you had any experience with using check_postgres.pl --action=dbstats with Cacti? I'm getting, in my cacti.log, a result of: SPINE: Poller[0] Host[124] DS[2619] SCRIPT: /usr/local/bin/check_postgres.pl --action=dbstats --host=192.0.2.23 --dbuser=monitor --dbpass=monitor --dbname=test, output: U The specific problem bing the 'output: U', which should look something like: output: backends:1 commits:97645 rollbacks:5 read:177034 hit:6872718 idxscan:0 idxtupread:0 idxtupfetch:0 idxblksread:2199 idxblkshit:3 seqscan:3 seqtupread:1000110 ret:24845129 fetch:2956289 ins:2201738 upd:3999 del:312 dbname:test Google seems to have a bunch of stuff talking about 'output: U', but dating back to '06 and older ... the command runs fine (and fast) from the command line, so not a timeout ... So, anyone using dbstats with the newest version of Cacti, and have it working? On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Greg, before I start hacking away at it, do you have any examples of using check_postgres_dbstats with cacti? rather not recreate teh wheel is someone has already done it ... thx ... On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Greg Smith wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: We are mainly a nagios / cacti environment, and I came across... Why start with Cacti then? There's way more Nagios integration available; the little check_pgsql that comes with it (I think it's still there), and the whole list at http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Plugins/Databases/PostgresQL I'd think that starting with http://bucardo.org/wiki/Check_postgres for example would put you way ahead of anything that's available for Cacti. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support g...@2ndquadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] PQntuples returns an int.
Greg Sabino Mullane a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I'm asking this because I'm wondering whether you could have more tuples in the result of a query than could be indexed by the 'int' type. May this happen? Yes, but it's a low concern as many other things would break before you got to that point. See: http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.general/browse_thread/thread/462c454345221267/f61926526b539036 or: http://5z8.info/super-nsfw_cyd Thank you. Indeed, I perfectly do believe you when you state that many things would break before. It's much more a typing issue in a strongly typed language (OCaml). Thanks again. Guillaume Yziquel. -- Guillaume Yziquel http://yziquel.homelinux.org/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] The REAL cost of joins
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Marcin Krol wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I have inadvertently set off a furball on an unrelated ng on what is the > actual cost of SQL joins. But there's no reliable conclusion. I would like to > actually know that, that is, are JOINs truly expensive? > > As they say, one measurement is worth a thousand opinions, so I've done > measurement on my PG app: > > $ time echo "\c hrs; > SELECT hosts.ip, reservation.start_date, architecture.architecture, > os_kind.os_kind, os_rel.os_rel, os_version.os_version, project.project, > email.email FROM hosts > INNER JOIN project ON project.id = hosts.project_id > INNER JOIN architecture ON hosts.architecture_id = architecture.id > INNER JOIN os_kind ON os_kind.id = hosts.os_kind_id > INNER JOIN os_rel ON hosts.os_rel_id = os_rel.id > INNER JOIN os_version ON hosts.os_version_id = os_version.id > INNER JOIN reservation_hosts ON hosts.id = reservation_hosts.host_id > INNER JOIN reservation on reservation.id = reservation_hosts.reservation_id > INNER JOIN email ON reservation.email_id = email.id > > ;" | psql > /dev/null > > real 0m0.099s > user 0m0.015s > sys 0m0.005s > > > > $ time echo "\c hrs; > > SELECT hosts.ip FROM hosts; > > SELECT reservation.start_date FROM reservation; > > SELECT architecture.architecture FROM architecture; > > SELECT os_rel.os_rel FROM os_rel; > > SELECT os_version.os_version FROM os_version; > > SELECT project.project FROM project; > > SELECT email.email FROM email; > > " | psql > /dev/null > > real 0m0.046s > user 0m0.008s > sys 0m0.004s > > Note: I've created indexes on those tables, both on data columns like > hosts.ip and on .id columns. > > What do you think of this? And in general: when (if?) should one denormalize > data? I don't get what these two examples are supposed to show? They do not, in general, create equivalent output data. If you had to write procedural logic to do the same correlation between the individual result sets as the joins are performing then you'd be back to at least the same performance and probably worse, so what exactly is being compared here? As to your second question; well, outside of not doing premature optimization I'll observe that for operational databases, denormalization rarely gives me enough savings to justify the resultant extra data management required to maintain it. If you're talking about a data warehouse (and given the way you've worded the question I supsect you are not?) then that's a different question, in that case I prefer to generate the data from the operational side of the house so you're no longer paying an operational cost to maintain the denormalized data (you've got a whole different set of costs instead). -- Peter Hunsberger -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
On 3/3/2010 5:16 PM, Michael Gould wrote: > One thing I've noticed is that on my machines, when I install the odbc > driver I get no error messages but when I look in the ODBC administrator I > do not see any entry for PostGres in the drivers list. > > I do know that it somehow is working because the DMC conversion tool only > uses ODBC and builds it's data structures based on what it gets back from > querying the database. > > Programs like WinSQL also work and I believe it uses ODBC. > > In the past I believe I remember seeing the Postgres driver listed in the > ODBC admin tool under the drivers tab. > > I'm running on a Windows 7 64 bit machine and I'm logged into our domain as > the domain administrator. Is there something else I need to do to install > the odbc driver under windows? I've even turned UAC off and it didn't seem > to help > Can't help on the Windows 7 ODBC not appearing in the drivers list If you can manage to configure a Data Source Name turn on the logging then connect using this DSN in your DMC app just do a simple select The log will get big quick so keep the selects small and use limit. This will allow to see what ODBC driver is up to open the C:\mylog_XXX and look at and you will find all the commands sent the Postgresql and the results then you will look for something like this. This will tell us what the Select looks like and what being sent DMC app. *[1444-387.642]Exec_with_parameters_resolved: copying statement params: trans_status=1, len=51, stmt='Select user_password from mediawiki.mwuser limit 10'* [1444-387.645] stmt_with_params = 'Select user_password from mediawiki.mwuser limit 10' [1444-387.646]about to begin SC_execute [1444-387.647] Sending SELECT statement on stmt=02C5D8C0, cursor_name='SQL_CUR02C5D8C0' qflag=0,1 [1444-387.648]CC_send_query: conn=04313E00, query='Select user_password from mediawiki.mwuser limit 10' --snip-- *[1444-387.665]qresult: len=44, buffer=':B:e2e28556:8ff13b68ebc64eccad0921d1571bf08c'* [1444-387.666]qresult: len=0, buffer='' *[1444-387.667]qresult: len=44, buffer=':B:60a118ba:592cb633245cc330d48cc2e52c922f90'* [1444-387.667]qresult: len=0, buffer='' [1444-387.668]qresult: len=0, buffer='' [1444-387.668]qresult: len=0, buffer='' [1444-387.669]qresult: len=0, buffer='' [1444-387.669]qresult: len=0, buffer='' [1444-387.670]qresult: len=0, buffer='' All legitimate Magwerks Corporation quotations are sent in a .PDF file attachment with a unique ID number generated by our proprietary quotation system. Quotations received via any other form of communication will not be honored. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including attachments, may contain legally privileged, confidential or other information proprietary to Magwerks Corporation and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it addresses. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any unauthorized viewing, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and destroy all occurrences of this e-mail immediately. Thank you.
[GENERAL] ArgoUML SQL code generator for PostgreSQL
Is there an SQL "code" generator for ArgoUML for Postgres? I have not been able to find it, which does not mean it is not there. Thanking you, John
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
Is there anyone out there using Windows 7 64 bit with Postgres 8.4.2 and the psqlodbc driver? I've tried to install using the one that is available with the standard windows installer. I've also tried to install with the one from EDB. It appears that the installer finishes the install but when I look for the drivers there are none in the odbc administrator. I've installed and uninstalled a couple of times. Does anyone have any idea on what is going on here and how to fix the problem? I've logged in as the domain adminstrator and the system administrator for our domain and I've turned UAC off also, but as of yet no luck. I know that they are at least partially installed because I can access our database via two tools that use ODBC as it's access method. It's just that they are not showing up in the administrator and this makes me think that I've got a problem. I'm trying to get a data conversion tool to work (was working when I was using Windows XP) to convert data from SQL Anywhere into PostgreSQL 8.4.2. The problem is with UUID columns that are looked up and used in other tables. The UUID's are created properly in their parent tables, but the value isn't correct when it is used as a lookup column. The author of this product has taken a complete backup of my database and restored it on his machine. When he runs the conversion routine it produces the correct data. The only difference between his machine and mine seems to be how the odbc driver is installed. He's using the one he downloaded from EDB. He sent it to me, I uninstalled the previous one I had, rebooted and installed the one he sent me. Same results, no driver shows up in the odbc admin. Best Regards Michael Gould "Justin Graf" wrote: >On 3/3/2010 5:16 PM, Michael Gould wrote: >> >> >>One thing I've noticed is that on my machines, when I install the odbc >>driver I get no error messages but when I look in the ODBC administrator I >>do not see any entry for PostGres in the drivers list. >> >>I do know that it somehow is working because the DMC conversion tool only >>uses ODBC and builds it's data structures based on what it gets back from >>querying the database. >> >>Programs like WinSQL also work and I believe it uses ODBC. >> >>In the past I believe I remember seeing the Postgres driver listed in the >>ODBC admin tool under the drivers tab. >> >>I'm running on a Windows 7 64 bit machine and I'm logged into our domain as >>the domain administrator. Is there something else I need to do to install >>the odbc driver under windows? I've even turned UAC off and it didn't seem >>to help >> >> > >Can't help on the Windows 7 ODBC not appearing in the drivers list > >If you can manage to configure a Data Source Name turn on the logging > >then connect using this DSN in your DMC app just do a simple select > >The log will get big quick so keep the selects small and use limit. This >will allow to see what ODBC driver is up to > >open the C:\mylog_XXX and look at and you will find all the commands sent >the Postgresql and the results > >then you will look for something like this. This will tell us what the >Select looks like and what being sent DMC app. > >[1444-387.642]Exec_with_parameters_resolved: copying statement params: >trans_status=1, len=51, stmt='Select user_password from mediawiki.mwuser >limit 10' >[1444-387.645] stmt_with_params = 'Select user_password from >mediawiki.mwuser limit 10' >[1444-387.646]about to begin SC_execute >[1444-387.647] Sending SELECT statement on stmt=02C5D8C0, >cursor_name='SQL_CUR02C5D8C0' qflag=0,1 >[1444-387.648]CC_send_query: conn=04313E00, query='Select user_password >from mediawiki.mwuser limit 10' >--snip-- >[1444-387.665]qresult: len=44, >buffer=':B:e2e28556:8ff13b68ebc64eccad0921d1571bf08c' >[1444-387.666]qresult: len=0, buffer='' >[1444-387.667]qresult: len=44, >buffer=':B:60a118ba:592cb633245cc330d48cc2e52c922f90' >[1444-387.667]qresult: len=0, buffer='' >[1444-387.668]qresult: len=0, buffer='' >[1444-387.668]qresult: len=0, buffer='' >[1444-387.669]qresult: len=0, buffer='' >[1444-387.669]qresult: len=0, buffer='' >[1444-387.670]qresult: len=0, buffer='' > > > > > >All legitimate Magwerks Corporation quotations are sent in a .PDF file >attachment with a unique ID number generated by our proprietary quotation >system. Quotations received via any other form of communication will not be >honored. > >CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including attachments, may contain >legally privileged, confidential or other information proprietary to >Magwerks Corporation and is intended solely for the use of the individual >to whom it addresses. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended >recipient or authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any >unauthorized viewing, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail >is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please >notify the sender by replying to this mes
[GENERAL] Failed to run initdb: 128
Hi
I am trying to install Postgres 8.2 on a virtual machine that has
Windown 2003 SP2. The installation fails with the error "Failed to run
initdb: 128". I searched the archives and looks like it is a catch-all
error. But is there anything specific that we can do to resolve this
issue?
I am logged in as an administrator, so no problem with permissions.
Postgres was able to create the windows user account properly and after
that it fails with the above error. It tells us to copy a log file
initdb.log, but that file does not exist.
There is another log file pginstall.log, where I do see some error
messages, I printed them below. Any help is appreciated.
Niranjan
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:242]: Note: 1: 2769 2: GetAvailableLocales 3:
1
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:242]: Note: 1: 2205 2: 3: Error
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:242]: Note: 1: 2228 2: 3: Error 4: SELECT
`Message` FROM `Error` WHERE `Error` = 2769
DEBUG: Error 2769: Custom Action GetAvailableLocales did not close 1
MSIHANDLEs.
The installer has encountered an unexpected error installing this
package. This may indicate a problem with this package. The error code
is 2769. The arguments are: GetAvailableLocales, 1,
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:258]: Closing MSIHANDLE (1) of type 790542 for
thread 2824
Action ended 15:59:30: GetAvailableLocales. Return value 1.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:273]: Doing action: CheckAvailableDLLs
Action 15:59:30: CheckAvailableDLLs.
Action start 15:59:30: CheckAvailableDLLs.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:351]: Creating MSIHANDLE (154) of type 790542
for thread 2824
MSI (c) (C4:68) [15:59:30:351]: Invoking remote custom action. DLL:
C:\DOCUME~1\LOCALI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\1\MSI5.tmp, Entrypoint:
checkavailabled...@4
MSI (c) (C4:68) [15:59:30:570]: Closing MSIHANDLE (154) of type 790542
for thread 2824
Action ended 15:59:30: CheckAvailableDLLs. Return value 1.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:570]: Skipping action: DisableInitdb
(condition is false)
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:570]: Doing action: ValidateProductID
Action 15:59:30: ValidateProductID.
Action start 15:59:30: ValidateProductID.
Action ended 15:59:30: ValidateProductID. Return value 1.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Doing action: CostInitialize
Action 15:59:30: CostInitialize. Computing space requirements
Action start 15:59:30: CostInitialize.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Machine policy value 'MaxPatchCacheSize'
is 10
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline: Sorting baselines for
{1F701DBD-1660-4108-B10A-FB435EA63BF0}.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline: New baseline 8.2.0 from
transaction.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline: Sorted order Native: Order 0.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline Data Table:
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: ProductCode:
{1F701DBD-1660-4108-B10A-FB435EA63BF0} Version: 8.2.0 Attributes: 0
PatchId: Native BaselineId: -
[GENERAL] Failed to run initdb: 128
Hi
I am trying to install Postgres 8.2 on a virtual machine that has
Windown 2003 SP2. The installation fails with the error "Failed to run
initdb: 128". I searched the archives and looks like it is a catch-all
error. But is there anything specific that we can do to resolve this
issue?
I am logged in as an administrator, so no problem with permissions.
Postgres was able to create the windows user account properly and after
that it fails with the above error. It tells us to copy a log file
initdb.log, but that file does not exist.
There is another log file pginstall.log, where I do see some error
messages, I printed them below. Any help is appreciated.
Niranjan
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:242]: Note: 1: 2769 2: GetAvailableLocales 3:
1
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:242]: Note: 1: 2205 2: 3: Error
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:242]: Note: 1: 2228 2: 3: Error 4: SELECT
`Message` FROM `Error` WHERE `Error` = 2769
DEBUG: Error 2769: Custom Action GetAvailableLocales did not close 1
MSIHANDLEs.
The installer has encountered an unexpected error installing this
package. This may indicate a problem with this package. The error code
is 2769. The arguments are: GetAvailableLocales, 1,
MSI (c) (C4:64) [15:59:30:258]: Closing MSIHANDLE (1) of type 790542 for
thread 2824
Action ended 15:59:30: GetAvailableLocales. Return value 1.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:273]: Doing action: CheckAvailableDLLs
Action 15:59:30: CheckAvailableDLLs.
Action start 15:59:30: CheckAvailableDLLs.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:351]: Creating MSIHANDLE (154) of type 790542
for thread 2824
MSI (c) (C4:68) [15:59:30:351]: Invoking remote custom action. DLL:
C:\DOCUME~1\LOCALI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\1\MSI5.tmp, Entrypoint:
checkavailabled...@4
MSI (c) (C4:68) [15:59:30:570]: Closing MSIHANDLE (154) of type 790542
for thread 2824
Action ended 15:59:30: CheckAvailableDLLs. Return value 1.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:570]: Skipping action: DisableInitdb
(condition is false)
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:570]: Doing action: ValidateProductID
Action 15:59:30: ValidateProductID.
Action start 15:59:30: ValidateProductID.
Action ended 15:59:30: ValidateProductID. Return value 1.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Doing action: CostInitialize
Action 15:59:30: CostInitialize. Computing space requirements
Action start 15:59:30: CostInitialize.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Machine policy value 'MaxPatchCacheSize'
is 10
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline: Sorting baselines for
{1F701DBD-1660-4108-B10A-FB435EA63BF0}.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline: New baseline 8.2.0 from
transaction.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline: Sorted order Native: Order 0.
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: Baseline Data Table:
MSI (c) (C4:08) [15:59:30:586]: ProductCode:
{1F701DBD-1660-4108-B10A-FB435EA63BF0} Version: 8.2.0 Attributes: 0
PatchId: Native BaselineId: -
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
Michael Gould wrote: > Does anyone have any idea on what is going on here and how to fix the > problem? I've logged in as the domain adminstrator and the system > administrator for our domain and I've turned UAC off also, but as of yet > no luck. I'm wondering if you should post to the pgsql-odbc list too, since some of the ODBC folks don't follow the main list very closely. > I know that they are at least partially installed because I can access > our database via two tools that use ODBC as it's access method. It's > just that they are not showing up in the administrator and this makes me > think that I've got a problem. If it's anything like it was in the win16 -> win32 transition, you'll need to fire up the 32-bit ODBC administrator, as it could be different. Try running "odbcad32.exe" > The author of this product has taken a complete backup of my database > and restored it on his machine. [where it works] Is his machine running windows 7? Is it 32-bit of 64-bit? -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
Argh - a follow-up re ODBC 32 and 64 bit-ness: http://blog.danovich.com.au/2010/02/02/odbc-settings-on-64-bit-servers/ It's way crazier than you'd ever expect. Both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions are called "odbcad32.exe" but are in different (but not distinctively named) locations. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942976/en-us *bangs head against desk* -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > It's way crazier than you'd ever expect. Both the 32-bit and 64-bit > versions are called "odbcad32.exe" but are in different (but not > distinctively named) locations. > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942976/en-us Wow. If I even had the slightest regret about my move to abandon Windows years ago, this would have pretty much squashed it. Magnus et. al., I don't know how you do it. :) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201003032043 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEAREDAAYFAkuPEHoACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj0XQCg07IhnWKKEK1YRNevteSdGv/z joMAoMJuGLwVsuybmumGgLkYe6yJyyGY =9NGC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Wow. If I even had the slightest regret about my move to abandon Windows years ago, this would have pretty much squashed it. Magnus et. al., I don't know how you do it. :) yeah, (l)unix systems/users/apps never get ./lib and ./lib64 mixed up, oh no. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > >> It's way crazier than you'd ever expect. Both the 32-bit and 64-bit >> versions are called "odbcad32.exe" but are in different (but not >> distinctively named) locations. >> >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942976/en-us > > Wow. If I even had the slightest regret about my move to abandon > Windows years ago, this would have pretty much squashed it. > Magnus et. al., I don't know how you do it. :) That page has to be an abandoned april fools joke, right? The 64 bit version is named odbcad32.exe? That has to be a joke of some kind. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Scratching my head why results are different between machines.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> >> Wow. If I even had the slightest regret about my move to abandon Windows >> years ago, this would have pretty much squashed it. Magnus et. al., I don't >> know how you do it. :) >> > > yeah, (l)unix systems/users/apps never get ./lib and ./lib64 mixed up, oh > no. My experience has been that when they get things like wrong (which is rare) they fix it instead of declaring it the new standard. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] Need to Reload a Dump File - Need to Delete the PGDATA directory Again?
Hi All, I'm in the processing of migrating to Postgres 8.3.8. I did : (1) initdb (2) psql -e template1 -f 21.bak &>/tmp/out21.bak Now, I've decided that I want to reload the same file again, do I just delete the PGDATA directory and then perform the same steps again? (1) initdb (2) psql -e template1 -f 21.bak &>/tmp/out21.bak What I'm asking is that do I always need to delete the PGDATA directory and then initdb to ensure that it will be a clean load? Thanks Mary -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Need to Reload a Dump File - Need to Delete the PGDATA directory Again?
Wang, Mary Y wrote: Hi All, I'm in the processing of migrating to Postgres 8.3.8. I did : (1) initdb (2) psql -e template1 -f 21.bak &>/tmp/out21.bak Now, I've decided that I want to reload the same file again, do I just delete the PGDATA directory and then perform the same steps again? (1) initdb (2) psql -e template1 -f 21.bak &>/tmp/out21.bak What I'm asking is that do I always need to delete the PGDATA directory and then initdb to ensure that it will be a clean load? is that dumpfile from pg_dumpall or pg_dump of a single database or what? if its just a single database, it should suffice to drop database mydb; create database mydb with owner myowner; and then run the script again. if its the full cluster dump, then yeah, deleting the $PGDATA and redoing initdb is the best way to insure clean initial conditions. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
