[GENERAL] Help me follow...
I hit bug 5665. I see threads like this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-01/msg00241.php Where / how can I find the diff that went in to fix this? Mostly I'm curious. I can work around the problem but wanted to create a patch file for myself to make deploying to other servers easier. Thank you for your help, Perry -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Help me follow...
On 14 July 2012 16:57, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote: I hit bug 5665. I see threads like this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-01/msg00241.php Where / how can I find the diff that went in to fix this? Mostly I'm curious. I can work around the problem but wanted to create a patch file for myself to make deploying to other servers easier. You can search through commits here: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=summary Sometimes a reference to the bug number may appear within the commit message, but this won't always happen. If you can't find the commit based on that, try the original reporter's name. We ordinarily credit bug reporters in commit messages that fix the bug. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Help me follow...
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 14 July 2012 16:57, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote: I hit bug 5665. I see threads like this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-01/msg00241.php Where / how can I find the diff that went in to fix this? Mostly I'm curious. I can work around the problem but wanted to create a patch file for myself to make deploying to other servers easier. You can search through commits here: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=summary Sometimes a reference to the bug number may appear within the commit message, but this won't always happen. If you can't find the commit based on that, try the original reporter's name. We ordinarily credit bug reporters in commit messages that fix the bug. I'm not sure we ever did fix it; I see no references to that bug in the commit history, nor to the similar bug #6059, nor does it look like we changed anything in the relevant make rules. I can no longer reproduce a failure when building out-of-tree from a tarball on my Fedora 16 box. That's still make 3.82, but Fedora is carrying half a dozen patches to the upstream tarball: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=make.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/f16;hb=f16 It's not immediately obvious which of those might be related, but I think this was a bug in gmake and the fix is in there somewhere. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Help me follow...
On 14 July 2012 18:56, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: I can no longer reproduce a failure when building out-of-tree from a tarball on my Fedora 16 box. That's still make 3.82, but Fedora is carrying half a dozen patches to the upstream tarball: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=make.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/f16;hb=f16 It's not immediately obvious which of those might be related, but I think this was a bug in gmake and the fix is in there somewhere. Agreed. Since Fedora 14 is now EOL, I'm not inclined to worry about it. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Help me follow...
On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: On 14 July 2012 18:56, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: I can no longer reproduce a failure when building out-of-tree from a tarball on my Fedora 16 box. That's still make 3.82, but Fedora is carrying half a dozen patches to the upstream tarball: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=make.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/f16;hb=f16 It's not immediately obvious which of those might be related, but I think this was a bug in gmake and the fix is in there somewhere. Agreed. Since Fedora 14 is now EOL, I'm not inclined to worry about it. I'm on AIX 6.1. Using gmake 3.82. PostgreSQL 9.0.4 Its definitely not a show stopper but from the email traffic, it looked like someone was going to make the Makefiles less cutting edge :-) Thank you for your time, Perry -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Is postgresql 9.1.* supporting plpython with python 2.*
On 07/13/2012 03:23 AM, Leger Bertrand wrote: Hi, I’m trying to setup plpython on my machine but get message : [WARNING ] CREATE EXTENSION plpythonu ERREUR: n'a pas pu accéder au fichier « $libdir/plpython2 » : No such file or directory In libdir I only get plpython3.dll depends22_x86 file:///P:\Mes%20Documents\Downloads\depends22_x86%20(1).ziptells me it relies on python32.dll, which isn’t installed on my machine because I wish to use python 2.6. Is there any chance to get support for plain old python ? I going to assume you are using the One Click Installer from Enterprise DB. If so you may want to bring this up on their forum on installer issue, see link below.: http://forums.enterprisedb.com/forums/show/9.page There is a thread already that discusses the issue: http://forums.enterprisedb.com/posts/list/2878.page#10732 Sincerly Bertrand. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
