Re: [GENERAL] ERROR: could not read block 4707 of relation 1663/16384/16564: Success

2011-08-01 Thread D M
I am not sure how big your table is one way we implemented here was we selected 
the clean rows and outputted it to a csv file. And the rows affected we had to 
load from the backup, luckily we had the clean backup.

Ex: assume you have 1,2,3,4,5100 rows and the corrupted is between 60-70. I 
outputted clean rows from 1-59 and 71-100 to a csv file and loaded in a new 
table. The corrupted was loaded back from a table. This just One of doing it. 
There might be more the experts here can answer very well. I am interested to 
see others answers as well. 

My way is time consuming and if you have a very large table or tables affected 
it's a nightmare to fix them. 

Good luck with your recovery.
Thanks
Deepak

On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Deniz Atak deniza...@gmail.com wrote:

 Deepak, Tom thanks for answering. 
 
 Tom, we have psql 8.1.18. So you are right, this weird message is because of 
 the old version. I will check with my colleague about the possible reasons. 
 What can I do if there is a messed up table?
 
 Regards,
 Deniz
 
 On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
 Deniz Atak deniza...@gmail.com writes:
  I am using postgresql on Glassfish server and I have EJB 3.0 for ORM. I am
  trying to run a query in PSQL but receiving following error:
 
  Local Exception Stack:
  Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services -
  2.0.0.v20091031-r5713): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException
  Internal Exception: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: could not read
  block 4707 of relation 1663/16384/16564: Success
 
 What Postgres server version is that?
 
 If it's 8.2 or older, this probably indicates a partial block at the end
 of the file.  Newer versions produce a more sensible error message for
 the case, but that's just cosmetic --- the real problem is a messed-up
 table.  Have you had a filesystem corruption or an out-of-disk-space
 condition on this machine?
 
regards, tom lane
 


Re: [GENERAL] ERROR: could not read block 4707 of relation 1663/16384/16564: Success

2011-07-30 Thread D M
My guess is some one moved the data folder or the directory got deleted 
(/var/lib/pgsql/9.0/data/.../...1663/16384/16564). Without server restart. I am 
sure some experts gonna answer this very well.

Thanks
Deepak
On Jul 30, 2011, at 2:01 AM, Deniz Atak deniza...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi, 
 
 I am using postgresql on Glassfish server and I have EJB 3.0 for ORM. I am 
 trying to run a query in PSQL but receiving following error:
 
 Local Exception Stack: 
 Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 
 2.0.0.v20091031-r5713): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException
 Internal Exception: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: could not read 
 block 4707 of relation 1663/16384/16564: Success
 Error Code: 0
 Call: select  src_ip  from table where date  '2011.07.29' AND date  
 '2011.07.30'  AND (  (src_ip = 'anIP' )  OR  ( src_ip = 'anotherIP' )  ) 
 group by src_ip;   
 bind = [2011-07-29 00:00:00.0, 2011-07-30 00:00:00.0, 195.122.20.236, 
 195.122.20.88, 500, 0]
 Query: ResultSetMappingQuery(sql=select  src_ip  from table where date  
 '2011.07.29' AND date  '2011.07.30'  AND (  (src_ip = 'anIP' )  OR  ( src_ip 
 = 'anotherIP' )  ) group by src_ip; )
 
 It is kind of weird to have an error that ends with success :) 
 
 Do you have any opinion about this problem? Thanks in advance. 
 
 Deniz
 
 
 


Re: [GENERAL] SHMMAX and SHMALL question

2011-01-22 Thread D M
Thank you so much for the script. 

~deepak

On Jan 22, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:

 DM wrote:
 RAM = 16GB, what value should i set for shmall?
 
 Given that PostgreSQL rarely sees increasing improvement as shared_buffers 
 goes over 50% of RAM, I just use that figure for the shmall and then compute 
 shmmax based on the page size to match it.  I use the attached script to do 
 all the hard work, haven't found a Linux system yet it didn't do the right 
 thing on.  It sounds like you might have the math on the relation between the 
 two backwards, look at the output and code of this once and that should sort 
 things out for you.
 
 -- 
 Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant USg...@2ndquadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
 PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us
 PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance: http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
 
 #!/bin/bash
 
 # Output lines suitable for sysctl configuration based
 # on total amount of RAM on the system.  The output
 # will allow up to 50% of physical memory to be allocated
 # into shared memory.
 
 # On Linux, you can use it as follows (as root):
 # 
 # ./shmsetup  /etc/sysctl.conf
 # sysctl -p
 
 # Early FreeBSD versions do not support the sysconf interface
 # used here.  The exact version where this works hasn't
 # been confirmed yet.
 
 page_size=`getconf PAGE_SIZE`
 phys_pages=`getconf _PHYS_PAGES`
 
 if [ -z $page_size ]; then
  echo Error:  cannot determine page size
  exit 1
 fi
 
 if [ -z $phys_pages ]; then
  echo Error:  cannot determine number of memory pages
  exit 2
 fi
 
 shmall=`expr $phys_pages / 2`
 shmmax=`expr $shmall \* $page_size` 
 
 echo \# Maximum shared segment size in bytes
 echo kernel.shmmax = $shmmax
 echo \# Maximum number of shared memory segments in pages
 echo kernel.shmall = $shmall

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general