Re: [GENERAL] Merge replication with Postgresql on Windows?

2010-10-01 Thread novnovice

Thanks Greg. I'd had a quick look at bucardo and while it seems capable of
doing the job (or helping to do that job), I was hoping there was something
simpler. But I will have a closer look.

Have you ever evaluated rubyrep (http://www.rubyrep.org/)? It's also multi
master. 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Merge-replication-with-Postgresql-on-Windows-tp2856176p3072858.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Merge replication with Postgresql on Windows?

2010-09-28 Thread novnovice

Joshua, you're with command prompt...you had/have a product called mammoth
replicator which I looked at. It seemed approx what I was after but the
project didn't seem very alive. Was my use case not what mammoth was about?
Or is it just that mammoth is basically gone?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Merge-replication-with-Postgresql-on-Windows-tp2856176p2857075.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Merge replication with Postgresql on Windows?

2010-09-27 Thread novnovice

That's a surprising response. But it makes sense, at least as one
perspective. I have written light duty sync systems but figured that there
would be some battle tested postgresql solution that was more robust than I
could cobble together. As in, if I invest 40 hours learning replication
system X, I'd be further along than if I'd invested the same 40 hours
writing my own system from scratch. It's not simple stuff. It would still be
good to eval whatever canned solutions are out there. I have googled this
topic of course; among the candidates none seemed to be a great match up
with what I hoped to find.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Merge-replication-with-Postgresql-on-Windows-tp2856176p2856288.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[GENERAL] Merge replication with Postgresql on Windows?

2010-09-27 Thread novnovice

Can anyone recommend a relatively simple merge replication package that would
work well on windows and which relies on one of the current postgresql
versions? 9 would be fine for my needs. I'm a fairly unsophisticated
postgresql user; and not very experienced with replication on other
databases. So the simplest to configure and maintain solution would be best.
I am not sure but it sounds like the new replication features that come
baked in to postgres 9 are not so oriented towards merge replication - is
that right?

My use case would involve a primary postgresql database and several
postgresql databases on disconnected notebook computers. All dbs need to be
able to support updates inserts etc; and then hopefully the replication
software would help with things like conflict resolution.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Merge-replication-with-Postgresql-on-Windows-tp2856176p2856176.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general