Re: [GENERAL] Anyone using silent_mode?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote: Is anyone using silent_mode=on ? There's some discussion on pgsql-hackers [1] on whether it should be removed altogether in 9.2, since you can get the same functionality with pg_ctl start, or nohup. If you're using silent_mode, what are you using it for? I run with slient_mode=on since all my logging goes to syslog. I don't need any other output from postgres. I've run this way since 7.1. I run on FreeBSD so I don't have that OOM killer problem. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[GENERAL] Anyone using silent_mode?
Is anyone using silent_mode=on ? There's some discussion on pgsql-hackers [1] on whether it should be removed altogether in 9.2, since you can get the same functionality with pg_ctl start, or nohup. If you're using silent_mode, what are you using it for? [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1308926157-sup-7...@alvh.no-ip.org -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] Anyone using silent_mode?
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:06 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Is anyone using silent_mode=on ? There's some discussion on pgsql-hackers [1] on whether it should be removed altogether in 9.2, since you can get the same functionality with pg_ctl start, or nohup. If you're using silent_mode, what are you using it for? [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1308926157-sup-7...@alvh.no-ip.org Not using it. Never did, and won't. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
