[GENERAL] How to drop sequence?

2004-02-28 Thread Igor Kryltsov
Hi,

I have table:


# \d category;
  category_id   | integer| not null default
nextval('public.category_category_id_seq'::text)
 category_name | character varying(100) | not null
Indexes: category_pkey primary key btree (category_id)

My goal is to remove sequence from category_id column and remove it after
from DB.

First I tried:

DROP SEQUENCE  category_category_id_seq - fails saying that table category
column category_id uses it

Than I tried:

ALTER TABLE category ALTER COLUMN category_id DROP DEFAULT;

Now category_id column is shown as integer not null only but :

DROP SEQUENCE  category_category_id_seq - fails saying that table category
column category_id uses it again


Any suggestions?

Thank you,


Igor



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html


Re: [GENERAL] How to drop sequence?

2004-03-01 Thread Ron St-Pierre
Igor Kryltsov wrote:

Hi,

I have table:

# \d category;
 category_id   | integer| not null default
nextval('public.category_category_id_seq'::text)
category_name | character varying(100) | not null
Indexes: category_pkey primary key btree (category_id)
My goal is to remove sequence from category_id column and remove it after
from DB.
First I tried:

DROP SEQUENCE  category_category_id_seq - fails saying that table category
column category_id uses it
Than I tried:

ALTER TABLE category ALTER COLUMN category_id DROP DEFAULT;

Now category_id column is shown as integer not null only but :

DROP SEQUENCE  category_category_id_seq - fails saying that table category
column category_id uses it again
Any suggestions?

Thank you,

Igor



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
 

Try 

DROP SEQUENCE category_category_id_seq CASCADE;

Ron



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
 joining column's datatypes do not match


Re: [GENERAL] How to drop sequence?

2004-06-09 Thread scott.marlowe
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Ron St-Pierre wrote:

> You're right I am getting the same results. I created the same table with:
>create table category (
>   category_id serial not null primary key,
>   category_name character varying(100) not null
>);
> 
>   alter table category alter column category_id drop default;
>   ALTER TABLE
> 
>drop sequence public.category_category_id_seq;
>ERROR:  cannot drop sequence category_category_id_seq because table 
> category column category_id requires it  
>HINT:  You may drop table category column category_id instead.
> 
> and it won't let me drop the sequence, even if I drop the default for 
> the column first. Does anyone know if this is the way this is supposed 
> to work, and if so, how to remove the dependency on it from the column 
> category_id?

OK, here's a story...

Once upon a time, whenever you created a table with a SERIAL column, it 
was implemented with a sequence that had no dependency tracking.  This 
meant that when you dropped the table, the sequence was still there.  
Given the simplistic method used to assign the name of a sequence created 
by the SERIAL macro, this meant that future attempts to create said table 
again would fail.  Witness, the wonder of postgresql 7.2:

postgres=# create table test (id serial, info text);
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence 'test_id_seq' for SERIAL column 
'test.id'
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / UNIQUE will create implicit index 'test_id_key' for table 
'test'
CREATE
postgres=# drop table test;
DROP
postgres=# create table test (id serial, info text);
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence 'test_id_seq' for SERIAL column 
'test.id'
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / UNIQUE will create implicit index 'test_id_key' for table 
'test'
ERROR:  Relation 'test_id_seq' already exists

But, with 7.3 the dependency tracking system started keeping track of the 
sequences created by the SERIAL macro, thus making it possible to have 
these things disappear when uneeded.  This is with 7.4:

postgres=# create table test (id serial, info text);
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "test_id_seq" for "serial" column 
"test.id"
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# drop table test;
DROP TABLE
postgres=# create table test (id serial, info text);
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "test_id_seq" for "serial" column 
"test.id"
CREATE TABLE
postgres=#

Note there's now no error with an undropped sequence.

But, as with all progress, it came with a price.  In the past, many users 
had used the serial macro and gotten used to the behaviour it exhibited, 
including myself, I must admit.  The agreement was made that from then on, 
if you wanted sequences to be tracked by dependency, use serial, if you 
want to have them be standalone you'd have to create them yourself.

Maybe there's a more complex way of handling dependencies that might fix 
this minor issue, like automatically tracking everytime a sequence is 
assigned to a clause in another table, but that might get caught in 
circular references and go kaboom if I wrote it. :-)

Now, if you want to uncouple them, you're playing in the database 
catalogs, which is as close to an unsupported feature as anything in 
postgresql can be.  Do a \dS in a psql session to see all the public 
catalog.  I'm not even sure where to start myself, and I wouldn't 
recommend doing anything to the catalogs on a production server.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])