[GENERAL] Postgres 8 and Slony-1
Hi Any news when Postgres 8 will be released? Also, are there any plans to include Slony with it, as part of the same source download, or as part of a group 'matched' source files/rpms/dpkgs etc? Thanks All Simon -- Simon Windsor Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01454 617689 Mob: 07960 321599 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 8 and Slony-1
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Windsor) would write: Any news when Postgres 8 will be released? If things go well, there's a release candidate hoped to be suitable for a Dec 15th date. But releases will _actually_ be ready when they are ready. Also, are there any plans to include Slony with it, as part of the same source download, or as part of a group 'matched' source files/rpms/dpkgs etc? That's not the PG Development Group's responsibility; if makers of Linux distributions choose to do so, that's _their_ problem. It looks as though that will be somewhat hard to do until Slony-I 1.1 gets released, as the 1.0 series isn't readily compilable without having a whole PG source tree around. In 1.1, there are more sophisticated source configuration options that make that particular inconvenience unnecessary. -- let name=cbbrowne and tld=gmail.com in name ^ @ ^ tld;; http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/linux.html They're deleting the word `gullible' from modern dictionaries, presumably because it's too difficult a concept for the modern man or woman to understand. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 8 and Slony-1
If things go well, there's a release candidate hoped to be suitable for a Dec 15th date. But releases will _actually_ be ready when they are ready. Also, are there any plans to include Slony with it, as part of the same source download, or as part of a group 'matched' source files/rpms/dpkgs etc? That's not the PG Development Group's responsibility; if makers of Linux distributions choose to do so, that's _their_ problem. It looks as though that will be somewhat hard to do until Slony-I 1.1 gets released, as the 1.0 series isn't readily compilable without having a whole PG source tree around. In 1.1, there are more sophisticated source configuration options that make that particular inconvenience unnecessary. -- let name=cbbrowne and tld=gmail.com in name ^ @ ^ tld;; http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/linux.html They're deleting the word `gullible' from modern dictionaries, presumably because it's too difficult a concept for the modern man or woman to understand. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
