[GENERAL] Seeking insight from heavy lifters

2003-09-29 Thread John Wells
A manager friend of mine sent me the following concern.  He's preparing to
shift to Postgresql from a proprietary DB and 4gl system:

---
To that end, I've also started studying up on Postgresql.  It seems to
have all the necessary features for a transaction heavy DB.  The recent
release is 7.3.  Of course, the proof will be in the pudding.  We
average 2.5 million transactions per day or 800 per second. 
Unfortunately, we would have no way of testing that until we committed to
getting the business logic moved over and had something to test it with. 
This is a bit of a catch 22 situation.  Just wished I knew of someone
locally who was running Postgresql in such a heavy environment.  I'd love
to find out how it performs for them. ---

While I have a lot of experience with PG, it's not really been in a heavy
processing environment.  Could I get some input to send him from anyone
out in the field using Postgres in a similar environment.

If PG isn't the best option here, what is?

Thanks very much for your input!

John




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] Seeking insight from heavy lifters

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian

What are the transfering from, exactly?

---

John Wells wrote:
 A manager friend of mine sent me the following concern.  He's preparing to
 shift to Postgresql from a proprietary DB and 4gl system:
 
 ---
 To that end, I've also started studying up on Postgresql.  It seems to
 have all the necessary features for a transaction heavy DB.  The recent
 release is 7.3.  Of course, the proof will be in the pudding.  We
 average 2.5 million transactions per day or 800 per second. 
 Unfortunately, we would have no way of testing that until we committed to
 getting the business logic moved over and had something to test it with. 
 This is a bit of a catch 22 situation.  Just wished I knew of someone
 locally who was running Postgresql in such a heavy environment.  I'd love
 to find out how it performs for them. ---
 
 While I have a lot of experience with PG, it's not really been in a heavy
 processing environment.  Could I get some input to send him from anyone
 out in the field using Postgres in a similar environment.
 
 If PG isn't the best option here, what is?
 
 Thanks very much for your input!
 
 John
 
 
 
 
 ---(end of broadcast)---
 TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [GENERAL] Seeking insight from heavy lifters

2003-09-29 Thread John Wells
Bruce,

A system called Progress, which is a 4GL/database combo I'm not really
that familiar with.

They're aware that Postgresql doesn't have a 4gl per se, but I think they
view the savings they'll gain by switching to an open solution as well
worth it.

Thanks,

John

Bruce Momjian said:

 What are the transfering from, exactly?

 ---


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


[GENERAL] Seeking insight from heavy lifters

2003-09-29 Thread John Wells
A manager friend of mine sent me the following concern.  He's preparing to
shift to Postgresql from a proprietary DB and 4gl system:

---
To that end, I've also started studying up on Postgresql.  It seems to have
all the necessary features for a transaction heavy DB.  The recent release
is 7.3.  Of course, the proof will be in the pudding.  We average 2.5
million transactions per day or 800 per second.  Unfortunately, we would
have no way of testing that until we committed to getting the business logic
moved over and had something to test it with.  This is a bit of a catch 22
situation.  Just wished I knew of someone locally who was running Postgresql
in such a heavy environment.  I'd love to find out how it performs for them.
---

While I have a lot of experience with PG, it's not really been in a heavy
processing environment.  Could I get some input to send him from anyone
out in the field using Postgres in a similar environment.

If PG isn't the best option here, what is?

Thanks very much for your input!

John


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org