Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2010-01-04 Thread Chris Browne
dcor...@connx.com (Dann Corbit) writes:
 (Commercial use of MySQL without paying a license fee requires that
 projects using the database are also GPL, IIRC).

I know I've seen Monty say this sort of thing a lot of times, and his
most recent rant
(http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-keep-internet-free.html)
underlines it with his mistaken belief.  

He indicates, without any documentation of it, that there's some special
GPL exception in Linux licensing, otherwise, presumably, commercial
use of Linux would require, um, paying Linus or RMS or ??? some
licensing fee for the proprietary version.

While Linux is indeed distributed under the GPL, as is MySQL, Linux
has an exception that allows anyone to run any kind of applications
(including closed source applications) on top of Linux.

You're not misreading what Monty said, but I think what he wrote was
self-serving (to his ex-company) nonsense.
-- 
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'acm.org';
http://linuxfinances.info/info/slony.html
Yes, for sparkling white chip prints, use low SUDSing DRAW

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2010-01-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Chris Browne wrote:
 dcor...@connx.com (Dann Corbit) writes:
  (Commercial use of MySQL without paying a license fee requires that
  projects using the database are also GPL, IIRC).
 
 I know I've seen Monty say this sort of thing a lot of times, and his
 most recent rant
 (http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-keep-internet-free.html)
 underlines it with his mistaken belief.  

I've heard that if you write a non-GPL program talking to a MySQL
database in, say, PHP, does not require the program itself being GPL,
only the PHP library that connects to MySQL.  It's the library that
links to MySQL, not your program, so your program is protected from
GPL's viral nature.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org:

 Chris Browne wrote:
  dcor...@connx.com (Dann Corbit) writes:
   (Commercial use of MySQL without paying a license fee requires that
   projects using the database are also GPL, IIRC).
  
  I know I've seen Monty say this sort of thing a lot of times, and his
  most recent rant
  (http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-keep-internet-free.html)
  underlines it with his mistaken belief.  
 
 I've heard that if you write a non-GPL program talking to a MySQL
 database in, say, PHP, does not require the program itself being GPL,
 only the PHP library that connects to MySQL.  It's the library that
 links to MySQL, not your program, so your program is protected from
 GPL's viral nature.

Which makes sense if you read the license, but has never been upheld in
a court of law, thus is still on shaky legal ground.

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2010-01-04 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 12:36 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
 In response to Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org:
 
  Chris Browne wrote:
   dcor...@connx.com (Dann Corbit) writes:
(Commercial use of MySQL without paying a license fee requires that
projects using the database are also GPL, IIRC).
   
   I know I've seen Monty say this sort of thing a lot of times, and his
   most recent rant
   (http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-keep-internet-free.html)
   underlines it with his mistaken belief.  
  
  I've heard that if you write a non-GPL program talking to a MySQL
  database in, say, PHP, does not require the program itself being GPL,
  only the PHP library that connects to MySQL.  It's the library that
  links to MySQL, not your program, so your program is protected from
  GPL's viral nature.
 
 Which makes sense if you read the license, but has never been upheld in
 a court of law, thus is still on shaky legal ground.

Can we move this thread to someplace relevant? This really has no place
on this list.

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or 
Sir.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2010-01-04 Thread Mark Williamson
Maybe move this to the mysql mailing list ;)

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.comwrote:

 On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 12:36 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
  In response to Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org:
 
   Chris Browne wrote:
dcor...@connx.com (Dann Corbit) writes:
 (Commercial use of MySQL without paying a license fee requires that
 projects using the database are also GPL, IIRC).
   
I know I've seen Monty say this sort of thing a lot of times, and his
most recent rant
(
 http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-keep-internet-free.html)
underlines it with his mistaken belief.
  
   I've heard that if you write a non-GPL program talking to a MySQL
   database in, say, PHP, does not require the program itself being GPL,
   only the PHP library that connects to MySQL.  It's the library that
   links to MySQL, not your program, so your program is protected from
   GPL's viral nature.
 
  Which makes sense if you read the license, but has never been upheld in
  a court of law, thus is still on shaky legal ground.

 Can we move this thread to someplace relevant? This really has no place
 on this list.

 Joshua D. Drake



 --
 PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
 Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
 Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr.
 or Sir.


 --
 Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
 To make changes to your subscription:
 http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua D. Drake

 Monty made his be, let him lie in it.


I repeat, this if off-topic. Please drop it.

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2009-12-31 Thread Peter Geoghegan
Andrew,

I don't think it's becoming of the Postgres community to gloat about
this. Your contention that MySQL will get flushed down the drain
sounds almost as misguided as Monty's contention that Oracle will
divest in, and ultimately somehow kill MySQL as a means of cornering
the RDBMS market.

The reason that MySQL can boast having so many installs is because it
is used in shared hosting shops around the world. I really strongly
doubt that Oracle are entertaining the idea of moving those sorts of
MySQL users (i.e. the majority) over to Oracle database - they want to
find a way to extract money from them, if that's possible. They
certainly won't have a monopoly on supporting MySQL that they can use
as leverage. Even if Oracle *could* somehow kill MySQL, I think it's
extremely unlikely that they'd be the beneficiary, and they know it. I
say this as someone who is largely indifferent to what happens to
MySQL, beyond the ramifications for PostgreSQL.

Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2009-12-31 Thread Dann Corbit
 -Original Message-
 From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
 ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Geoghegan
 Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:23 PM
 To: Andrew Lardinois
 Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA
 
 Andrew,
 
 I don't think it's becoming of the Postgres community to gloat about
 this. Your contention that MySQL will get flushed down the drain
 sounds almost as misguided as Monty's contention that Oracle will
 divest in, and ultimately somehow kill MySQL as a means of cornering
 the RDBMS market.
 
 The reason that MySQL can boast having so many installs is because it
 is used in shared hosting shops around the world. I really strongly
 doubt that Oracle are entertaining the idea of moving those sorts of
 MySQL users (i.e. the majority) over to Oracle database - they want to
 find a way to extract money from them, if that's possible. They
 certainly won't have a monopoly on supporting MySQL that they can use
 as leverage. Even if Oracle *could* somehow kill MySQL, I think it's
 extremely unlikely that they'd be the beneficiary, and they know it. I
 say this as someone who is largely indifferent to what happens to
 MySQL, beyond the ramifications for PostgreSQL.

I suspect that Oracle could be interested in collection of revenue from
MySQL users who are using it commercially without a license in violation
of the current license agreement for MySQL. (Commercial use of MySQL
without paying a license fee requires that projects using the database
are also GPL, IIRC).

Just a wild guess, of course.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2009-12-31 Thread John R Pierce

Dann Corbit wrote:

I suspect that Oracle could be interested in collection of revenue from
MySQL users who are using it commercially without a license in violation
of the current license agreement for MySQL. (Commercial use of MySQL
without paying a license fee requires that projects using the database
are also GPL, IIRC)


I'm pretty sure this only applies to commercial software thats 
distributed -with- MySQL






--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2009-12-31 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Lardinois lardin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can't help myself, but I've used mysql in the past, and got on a list of
 some sort once upon a time about that.  Just received an email petition from
 Monty to help save mysql.  Certainly you know the story:  Oracle buys Sun,
 which currently owns mysql, and the little dolphin get's flushed down the
 drain.  Perhaps they should watch The Cove, a documentary about dolphins
 biting the dust.

Be nice!  I really think that Oracle owning MySQL could be the best
thing to happen to it.  If they put even a tiny percentage of their
programming man power behind it they could have one of the fastest
key-value databases in myisam storage, which is very useful for
certain types of apps.  They could also fix a lot of long standing
mental retardation that's been allowed to live on forever (innodb
tables ignoring column level FK constraints, no FTS on innodb etc).

If they got it to the point that all the parts that burn with the
stupid were fixed, it would be useful as a sales tool, step up kinda
thing.

Monty made his be, let him lie in it.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Save MySQL? HA

2009-12-31 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 21:08 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
 Dann Corbit wrote:
  I suspect that Oracle could be interested in collection of revenue from
  MySQL users who are using it commercially without a license in violation
  of the current license agreement for MySQL. (Commercial use of MySQL
  without paying a license fee requires that projects using the database
  are also GPL, IIRC)
 
 I'm pretty sure this only applies to commercial software thats 
 distributed -with- MySQL

Guys, this is wholly off-topic.

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or 
Sir.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general